NASCAR's credibility gap shows in debate over Earnhardt's win

WriterDom

Good to the last drop
Joined
Jun 25, 2000
Posts
20,077
By EDDIE PELLS
.c The Associated Press


DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. (AP) - Conspiracy theorists, start your engines.

Actually, they've been ready since the celebration ended Saturday night at Daytona and Dale Earnhardt Jr. left with his victory in the Pepsi 400.

Earnhardt won the first race at the track since his father was killed Feb. 18 in a last-lap wreck in the Daytona 500.

Junior was pushed across the finish line by Michael Waltrip, the teammate who won the 500 with his help. In a late charge from seventh to first, Earnhardt's car seemed to defy the laws of physics on a track where carburetor restrictor plates limit horsepower and almost always keep drivers close.

In virtually every aspect, the storybook triumph seemed too good to be true. Many skeptics think maybe it really was.

No fewer than a half-dozen newspaper columnists wrote Monday about the ``wink-wink-nod-nod aspects of the result,'' in the words of the Tampa Tribune's Martin Fennelly. All day, the talk show hosts said it and the Internet users posted it.

A ridiculous notion? Of course it is, for any big-time sport.

But NASCAR has taken a very slow, increasingly awkward path into the spotlight. It hasn't quite gained the level of respect it yearns for, as all this second-guessing proves.

Once a sleepy Southern pastime filled with good ol' boys who couldn't tell a ratings point from a restrictor plate, it has become a riveting soap opera doubling as sport in the 4 1/2 months since The Intimidator's death.

Safety issues have cast a cloud. Fans and media - all paying more attention than ever before - have put NASCAR on the spot, wondering if it is leveling with the public and doing everything in its power to protect the drivers.

Crucial doubts on that front have left NASCAR open to questions about everything else, too - including the sanctity of a result so dramatic it almost seems corny.

``You don't go by yourself on the outside and make that kind of time up,'' Johnny Benson said of Earnhardt's late-race push to the front. ``But it's OK. It was good that Junior won.''

It's not the first time NASCAR has been accused of fashioning a perfect ending.

Nobody can forget Richard Petty's final victory in 1984. The King of racing earned his 200th win on July 4th, with President Reagan in the crowd. Fairy tale stuff, indeed.

But there's really no need to turn the clock back so far to find examples of NASCAR's credibility gap.

NASCAR has brandished a reputation as being one of the very few governing bodies in sports that tinkers with the rules on a consistent basis, sometimes from month to month, or moment to moment.

Tony Stewart lost 20 places in the final standings of Saturday's race when he received the black flag for crossing the yellow line at the bottom of the track.

NASCAR has always played it loose with that rule, but before the race, drivers were warned that enforcement would be stringent. Of course, the announcement came with the caveat that all rulings were subject to ``NASCAR's judgment'' - no black and white there.

You say Fords are running too well on restrictor-plate tracks? No problem. NASCAR will tweak a spoiler or adjust a metal strip on the car to let the Chevys catch up.

For one night, NASCAR could have done that just for Junior, the biggest cynics might say. Naturally, NASCAR officials deny the fix was in Saturday night, and there are facts to back them up.

A quick reality check:

Earnhardt had the most dominant car all weekend long. He led 116 of 160 laps. Sure, he only qualified 13th, but qualifying doesn't mean much in NASCAR, because the conditions are so drastically different from the races.

Earnhardt and Waltrip also had the two best cars at the Daytona 500 - proof that the teams at Dale Earnhardt Inc. clearly have found some edge in restrictor-plate racing.

On his final pit stop, Earnhardt changed four tires, something none of the six drivers he overcame during his charge to the front had done. It's much easier to pass the way Earnhardt did on four fresh, well-handling tires than the worn ones the vanquished drivers were using.

``I don't think it was fixed by any means,'' driver Jeremy Mayfield said, being questioned on the Tony Kornheiser radio show. ``They were prepared and ready to win.''

Still, this is a day for Doubting Thomases, and they have plenty of ammunition.

Remember what NBC did last week? Network producers admitted giving drivers a little pep talk about post-race celebrations. Don't forget to smile, they said.

No, the network executives bristled, they weren't trying to stage celebrations in Victory Lane. But yes, a little post-race excitement wouldn't hurt. It is, after all, a $2.8 billion TV contract.

Spinning doughnuts in the infield after his victory, making a mosh-pit dive into the arms of his crew, Earnhardt gave the fans and TV cameras everything they could have hoped for Saturday night.

There was no way that kind of scene could have been staged. Or so we'd like to believe.
 
It is to wonder. How ever it was done,maybe now we can put Dale to rest. And a little peace for his family.
 
Oh what the hell, I'll jump in here...

I think it was Automobile magazine a few years back that referred to it as "The Call". Every so often, to boost ratings or to endear itself to certain fans, some driver who has no business winning, does. This they surmised is called getting "The Call".

Example: Dale Sr. finally won Daytona and then never won another race that year. Perhaps a slightly larger restrictor plate was slipped in, perhaps, oh who knows. But it would be easy to give a driver a car a bit faster than the rest.

When Mikey won Daytona a few months back, pushed along by Dale Jr, no one thought anything about it. Then at the Pepsi 400, the first return to the scene of Dale Sr's death, the finish order is reversed. Dale Jr wins, pushed along by Mikey. In the interview, Dale Jr. said "It was all car". Indeed, maybe it was. He hasn't won all year and in fact has kind of languished mid-pack up until that race. Did it look good to have the son win the race at the scene of his father's death? You bet. Did it also look suspicioius? Absolutely. Could it have been rigged? Yes, and it would have been quite easy to do.

Who knows. Doesn't matter. But it does kind of make NASCAR look a bit like pro wrestling now doesn't it?
 
I was wondering how long it would take to hear this....................

Bored now...................................zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
WriterDom said:
By EDDIE PELLS
.c The Associated Press


DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. (AP) - Conspiracy theorists, start your engines.

Actually, they've been ready since the celebration ended Saturday night at Daytona and Dale Earnhardt Jr. left with his victory in the Pepsi 400.

Earnhardt won the first race at the track since his father was killed Feb. 18 in a last-lap wreck in the Daytona 500.

Junior was pushed across the finish line by Michael Waltrip, the teammate who won the 500 with his help. In a late charge from seventh to first, Earnhardt's car seemed to defy the laws of physics on a track where carburetor restrictor plates limit horsepower and almost always keep drivers close.

In virtually every aspect, the storybook triumph seemed too good to be true. Many skeptics think maybe it really was.

No fewer than a half-dozen newspaper columnists wrote Monday about the ``wink-wink-nod-nod aspects of the result,'' in the words of the Tampa Tribune's Martin Fennelly. All day, the talk show hosts said it and the Internet users posted it.


The same conspiracy theorists who cover Nascar only when there's a tragedy. These aren't the regular Winston Cup reporters who know the series and the implausability of a fix.

For the true story check these out

http://www.accessatlanta.com/partners/ajc/epaper/editions/tuesday/sports_b3a4ca6f137d61280007.html

http://www.timesnews.net/index.cgi?CONTEXT=story&BISKIT=93674869410349&id=47945&category=61

http://nascar.miningco.com/library/weekly/aa070901a.htm

And from David Poole, one of the most respected motorsports journalists http://www.thatsracin.com/01/0707/0710poole.htm

WriterDom said:

Once a sleepy Southern pastime filled with good ol' boys who couldn't tell a ratings point from a restrictor plate, it has become a riveting soap opera doubling as sport in the 4 1/2 months since The Intimidator's death.

Safety issues have cast a cloud. Fans and media - all paying more attention than ever before - have put NASCAR on the spot, wondering if it is leveling with the public and doing everything in its power to protect the drivers.

Crucial doubts on that front have left NASCAR open to questions about everything else, too - including the sanctity of a result so dramatic it almost seems corny.

If the Earnhardt family is satisfied with the investigations and the report of the independent expert who viewed the autopsy photos as part of a settlement with the Orlando Sentinel, then who the hell are we to question. They lost more than anyone and they're the ones who have said let it be.


WriterDom said:

``You don't go by yourself on the outside and make that kind of time up,'' Johnny Benson said of Earnhardt's late-race push to the front. ``But it's OK. It was good that Junior won.''

Oh how quickly they forget. October 2000 at Talladega Dale Earnhardt (don't call him Sr) went from 18th to the win in 10 laps. Junior's moves were impressive, but not unprecedented.

WriterDom said:

But there's really no need to turn the clock back so far to find examples of NASCAR's credibility gap.

NASCAR has brandished a reputation as being one of the very few governing bodies in sports that tinkers with the rules on a consistent basis, sometimes from month to month, or moment to moment.

Nascar is not a democracy, a republic, or governed by a board of directors. It is now, and always has been a dictatorship with the France Family in control. Don't like it, well go race ASA or open wheels.

WriterDom said:

Tony Stewart lost 20 places in the final standings of Saturday's race when he received the black flag for crossing the yellow line at the bottom of the track.

NASCAR has always played it loose with that rule, but before the race, drivers were warned that enforcement would be stringent. Of course, the announcement came with the caveat that all rulings were subject to ``NASCAR's judgment'' - no black and white there.

Tony was black flagged because he crossed the yellow line AND advanced his position. Granted, he was forced below the yellow line by Benson, but once there, he should have held his position on the track, instead of passing Benson. The only penalty that was assessed was being black flagged (report to your pit stop in the pit and proceed). Tony ignored the black flag for three consecutive laps, and as per the Nascar rule book, his score card was pulled and any laps he completed afterwards did not count. Because the infraction occurred with 4 laps to go, the only lap that Tony completed that did not count was the last lap (Lap 160) so he completed 159 laps, enough for 26th place in the race.


WriterDom said:

A quick reality check:

Earnhardt had the most dominant car all weekend long. He led 116 of 160 laps. Sure, he only qualified 13th, but qualifying doesn't mean much in NASCAR, because the conditions are so drastically different from the races.

Earnhardt and Waltrip also had the two best cars at the Daytona 500 - proof that the teams at Dale Earnhardt Inc. clearly have found some edge in restrictor-plate racing.

On his final pit stop, Earnhardt changed four tires, something none of the six drivers he overcame during his charge to the front had done. It's much easier to pass the way Earnhardt did on four fresh, well-handling tires than the worn ones the vanquished drivers were using.

And the best car from the Daytona 500, the DEI owned Napa Chevrolet driven by Michael Waltrip is sitting in the Daytona USA museum until next February. Junior has run very well at restrictor plate tracks
WriterDom said:

Remember what NBC did last week? Network producers admitted giving drivers a little pep talk about post-race celebrations. Don't forget to smile, they said.

No, the network executives bristled, they weren't trying to stage celebrations in Victory Lane. But yes, a little post-race excitement wouldn't hurt. It is, after all, a $2.8 billion TV contract.

NBC is trying to save it's ass because they have technical difficulties and pit reporters with the sensitivity of brass billygoats. They hired some of the best in the business and now aren't letting them do their jobs. They're doing marginally better than Fox but not much.

http://www.freep.com/sports/othersports/crowe9_20010709.htm

WriterDom said:

Spinning doughnuts in the infield after his victory, making a mosh-pit dive into the arms of his crew, Earnhardt gave the fans and TV cameras everything they could have hoped for Saturday night.

There was no way that kind of scene could have been staged. Or so we'd like to believe.

Junior's doughnuts in the grass (the infield is the part inside the pit area where the garage, transporters, and fans in motorhomes are located) was simply another way of honoring his father. Dale Earnhardt did a similar spin there in 1998 when he won the Daytona 500. The mosh pit dive is normal victory lane behavior for Junior. He's done it before and I'm sure he'll do it again.


WD, you knew I couldn't leave this one alone. Dammit, let me enjoy the good ones. Go back to G*&^*% or dig something else up on Stewart. I'm sure there's some good articles out there about Mark Martin's sponsor (Viagra) or the flap about Jeanne Slazko. Or what about Hendrick's son becoming the youngest winner ever in the truck series???
 
Back
Top