Rainbow Skin
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2002
- Posts
- 514
(No-longer-quite-a-virgin no doubt rehashing old boring thread, sorry.)
Bad pron cliche: Brad and Chad; Brandi and Candi and Cyndi.
Real life: Room full of Andys, Daves, Petes, and Robs. Females have more variety but any one group contains multiple Sarahs and Kates.
Bad non-porn cliche: John or Mary, or little Timmy.
So how do you balance between realism and distinctiveness? I think as a matter of principle one ought to write the occasional story with two characters having the same name, but I wouldn't want to say the Petes and Kates should predominate in the same numbers they do in real life.
I tend to avoid the names that are just the Hebrew for 'physical object', and go for second-rank ones, common but not absurdly common: Martin and Graham and Helen and... oh wait, actually on collating my stories I find I use more variety: Vanessa and Fleur and Nora. But as I go on there will be more Grahams and Martins to give it realism.
Bad pron cliche: Brad and Chad; Brandi and Candi and Cyndi.
Real life: Room full of Andys, Daves, Petes, and Robs. Females have more variety but any one group contains multiple Sarahs and Kates.
Bad non-porn cliche: John or Mary, or little Timmy.
So how do you balance between realism and distinctiveness? I think as a matter of principle one ought to write the occasional story with two characters having the same name, but I wouldn't want to say the Petes and Kates should predominate in the same numbers they do in real life.
I tend to avoid the names that are just the Hebrew for 'physical object', and go for second-rank ones, common but not absurdly common: Martin and Graham and Helen and... oh wait, actually on collating my stories I find I use more variety: Vanessa and Fleur and Nora. But as I go on there will be more Grahams and Martins to give it realism.