Damoiselle
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2017
- Posts
- 299
I mean, I've seen critical comments before but this one comes with a focus I have no seen before in my feedback.
"Something fishy
The writing is good, but it's nothing special. I don't know what build-up the previous commenter is referring to. There is absolutely no sex and 2 anemic pages to this chapter.... And this shot to number 1 rank of Non-Con Top List. With only 18k views. That's highly improbable. Lit readers are not stupid. Ok. I'm gonna say it. I very much doubt the star rating of this story. Someone's been messing with the voting, herself. Sadly, there is little originality to this work, as it is very similar to The Rebellious Slave: futuristic war, slaver invaders, male antagonist is high in chain of command, heroine is a medic and gets captured as slave, a male relative of the heroine is a weapon/bomb builder, truth serum/technology used... I could keep going but it is VERY obviously inspired by that tremendous work, except the characters in that story are complex and not one-dimensional. The most original part of Imperius is the allegory to the Roman Empire but the plot is derivative and missed more interesting directions. I rue this loss. Because it could have been glorious! If the writer spent less time faking the voting results and instead listened to the readers (instead of being defensive) she would have realized a much more successful story. That's the whole benefit of Literotica. But everyone learns from experience. I hope you will continue to improve, because you do have great potential."
I think it's a work of art, actually. I'm fascinated by the technique of referring to me in the third person through most of it, and then amicably complimenting my potential right at the end. Really interesting juxtaposition.
I just...how could I possibly be meddling with the rating? What kind of power does this person think I have?
"Something fishy
The writing is good, but it's nothing special. I don't know what build-up the previous commenter is referring to. There is absolutely no sex and 2 anemic pages to this chapter.... And this shot to number 1 rank of Non-Con Top List. With only 18k views. That's highly improbable. Lit readers are not stupid. Ok. I'm gonna say it. I very much doubt the star rating of this story. Someone's been messing with the voting, herself. Sadly, there is little originality to this work, as it is very similar to The Rebellious Slave: futuristic war, slaver invaders, male antagonist is high in chain of command, heroine is a medic and gets captured as slave, a male relative of the heroine is a weapon/bomb builder, truth serum/technology used... I could keep going but it is VERY obviously inspired by that tremendous work, except the characters in that story are complex and not one-dimensional. The most original part of Imperius is the allegory to the Roman Empire but the plot is derivative and missed more interesting directions. I rue this loss. Because it could have been glorious! If the writer spent less time faking the voting results and instead listened to the readers (instead of being defensive) she would have realized a much more successful story. That's the whole benefit of Literotica. But everyone learns from experience. I hope you will continue to improve, because you do have great potential."
I think it's a work of art, actually. I'm fascinated by the technique of referring to me in the third person through most of it, and then amicably complimenting my potential right at the end. Really interesting juxtaposition.
I just...how could I possibly be meddling with the rating? What kind of power does this person think I have?