Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
cloudy said:I want her to work at the pentagon, something fairly high up, but not necessarily in the military. The only requirement is that she has to be "in the know" when things go from bad to worse, etc.
Help?
cloudy said:I want her to work at the pentagon, something fairly high up, but not necessarily in the military. The only requirement is that she has to be "in the know" when things go from bad to worse, etc.
Help?
TE999 said:NSA, DIA, DSA and the CIA all have highly placed civilians in their ranks, to name a few.
Or there could be a fictitious agency if you're not trying for complete authenticity.
I'm sure you're way to young to remember the Iran/Contra hearing's back during the Reagan years or the testimony of USMC Col. Ollie North and especially that of his admin. assistant, Fawn Hall.cloudy said:I want her to work at the pentagon, something fairly high up, but not necessarily in the military. The only requirement is that she has to be "in the know" when things go from bad to worse, etc.
Help?
Rumple Foreskin said:I'm sure you're way to young to remember the Iran/Contra hearing's back during the Reagan years or the testimony of USMC Col. Ollie North and especially that of his admin. assistant, Fawn Hall.
She was a knock-out and everyone assumed she was like the non-typing bimbo's congressmen loved to hide on their payrolls. They were wrong. She was a classified employee with first-rate performance reports and opened her remarks to the comm by saying, "I'm Fawn Hall, and I know how to type." She then went on to run circles around the comm members.
http://students.westport.k12.ct.us/elsalvador/the%20working%20life_files/image003.jpg
Rumple Foreskin![]()
cloudy said:Shows how ignorant I am....the only one of those I recognize is the CIA.
I'm not planning on going into great detail about her job, but she does have to be in place to see the world situation deteriorate, and actually know what's going on. (any more info, and I'll be giving my storyline away)
cloudy said:Shows how ignorant I am....the only one of those I recognize is the CIA.
I'm not planning on going into great detail about her job, but she does have to be in place to see the world situation deteriorate, and actually know what's going on. (any more info, and I'll be giving my storyline away)
Bless you, I needed that.cloudy said:No, I remember the hearings....even watched them some. I must be older than you think, but thank you.![]()
cloudy said:okay....see if this would work, for those of you who know more about this than I do:
If she was some sort of CIA type, maybe the one that several operatives report to, and things started going bad starting in the area where her operatives are, would she know the whole situation, or most of it?
And what would her title be?
slyc_willie said:She could also be employed by one of many civilian companies that have regular military contracts, such as Boeing, McDonnel-Douglas, Microsoft, or nearly any communications company.
cloudy said:okay....see if this would work, for those of you who know more about this than I do:
If she was some sort of CIA type, maybe the one that several operatives report to, and things started going bad starting in the area where her operatives are, would she know the whole situation, or most of it?
And what would her title be?
Rumple Foreskin said:She'd be the control agent, sometimes called, a handler. Jargon will vary from agency-to-agency, country-to-country, and between time periods.
I like TE's suggestion. And add to slyc's list: Halliburton. Under normal circumstances, I'd think she would be in the know. Of course, what she might not know, but should, could be key to a plot.
As for lingo, you might try this link: http://www.themasterofdisguise.com/glossary.html
Rumple Foreskin![]()
only_more_so said:Either the CIA or the NSA would be good for what you're talking about. The thing to remember about "developing" situations is that even the best information is going to be only so-so if it comes from on the ground operatives. They can only see so much of the picture and quickly relate a smaller portion of it.
There are also a lot of people who analyze satellite data, or data from other sensors. This could mean monitoring phone usage (even phone calls), radio broadcasts, even tapping into alarm systems. Basically assume any electronic information can be processed and intercepted. Again the question is how much of it can be understood at any given time.
So assume half the information is wrong at first, maybe even 90%. The magnitude of the situation might be clear, but not how its going to fall out.
Ted-E-Bare said:Just don't let Karl Rove find out her name, or your story will end too soon.![]()