Movie director convinces cameraman's wife to be in the movie and "its not porn, its art"

lily_wall_

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 8, 2024
Posts
1,141
A movie director meets his cameraman's wife and plans to turn her into a whore and the cameraman into a cuck. He convinces the cameraman and the wife that the lead actress walked away and the only way to save the movie would be if they cast the wife as the lead actress.

As the filming continues, the scenes get more and more sexual, and the director keeps asking for retakes. The actors, the producers, everyone catches on what's going on and play along. When the cameraman tries to put a stop to it, the director convinces him "its not porn, its art". Hesitatingly, the cameraman accepts, and even ends up suggesting new camera angles.

As days go by, the filming just turns out to "who's gonna have sex with the wife today?" There's love making scenes, threesome, gang bangs scenes, rape scenes, passionate kissing scenes, and a wedding scene

To improve on-screen chemistry, the director suggests the wife spend time kissing off screen with whichever actor is gonna be in the next scene, spend the evenings together, practice sex at night in hotel rooms with the director or with someone as the director watches and gives notes. She basically becomes free use

She has to stay in character off screen to help her acting, so that means no kissing or sex or anything sexual with her husband, the cameraman. The director tells her to stop thinking of the cameraman as her husband. Well, she can't really help because the ring on her finger reminds her of the cameraman. So to help her, the director plans a wedding scene as the movie climax where he and the wife get married on screen

When the movie gets released, all of the explicit scenes are edited out. The movie is a hit. Public loves it. The wife becomes a star, the movie wins all sorts of awards, best movie, best actress, best actor, best director, best supporting role, and of course, best cameraman award.

There's a director's cut of the movie too which is only for private screenings for the director and his friends and of course he invites the cameraman and the movie star
 
Last edited:
Back in the 70's I think, the owner of Penthouse did a film called Caligula. It had a decent budget and cast and featured a lot of nudity. Helen Mirren was in it I think. But then after principal photography was done, actual penetrative pornography was filmed and edited into the movie. It's quite infamous.

I could see a wife getting caught up in such a thing. She's gorgeous, and the money is good, for an apparently legitimate film, so they agree to do it. But when the sex scene becomes actual sex, the cameraman watches his wife get lost in the euphoria and ecstasy of the moment, as she's used over and over. He knows he should stop the camera, call a halt tot the whole fucking thing, but he's utterly captured watching the way she is responding to the way they are touching her.

Maybe he passes off the camera, dons a mask and slips into the scene himself, only revealing himself when he's balls deep inside his wife, and their eyes meet. How does their life change after the experience?
 
There is a story on here that has that premise but it’s a porno from the start (with the scenes going from vanilla to a gangbang), which I think works better as the big sticking point for me on this one is make lead is a cameraman, a position that can have a pretty good gauge of what’s going on and has a union (so if this is a really legitimate production he could just call his rep).

So while I get the idea of a guy having to record his wife fuck, I think it would be better to go with either a different position or increases the desperation of cameraman and his wife: it’s not a studio pic and it’s filmed in another country so union rules are being ignored. They desperately need the money and while director has pulled some stunts in the past at worst it was maybe showing an onscreen blowjob.

I think it would be a lot better though for another position, specifically: executive producer. Why? Because a normal producer needs to know the industry, needs to know how to grease palms and get what the director needs while also making the director do what the investors want. Executive though? Hell, sometimes people will throw that credit out as a bonus on a Patreon. Yeah, sometimes it’s someone who is doing the producer work but sometimes it’s just some rich douche who wanted to get a credit and say they made a movie.

So in this idea, he’s some techbro throws a shit ton of money on some passion project and hires a director. He’s always showing his trophy wife off and she mentions how she always wanted to be a star. Director then does the plot you described: money is already in his account so the movie is getting made either way and executive producer had made a big deal of staying on set (hell maybe parts are being filmed in his house) so he just watches as his wife fucks all of her much more handsome much more endowed costars.

He of course tries to sue but the actual producer has already worked out every deal and made things legally airtight. It’s going to streaming, it’s going to blu-ray, it’s getting an unrated release and there ain’t shit he can do about it

I just think that works better as you have someone who is involved with the movie but doesn’t actually know the business
 
Change the power dynamic. I don't like the little guy being the underdog. Make the cameraman get the upper hand. Maybe he talks his wife into it to get some dirt on the director. Maybe he secretly has a thing with the director's wife they hatch a plan together.
 
Back
Top