Mother burns her son's genitals. Score another one for feminism!

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://foxync.com/2583402/oklahoma-teen-mom-burns-babys-genitals-with-a-hair-straightening-iron/

Oklahoma Teen Mom Burns Baby’s Genitals With A Hair Straightening Iron
May 23, 2012 By Sha'Linda Jeanine

Rock was reportedly straightening her hair when she then decided to clamp her child’s testicles with the straightening iron she was using. The infant had three burn marks which started on the inside of his right thigh and reach his testicles. But this incident was not the first instance in which the child was abused.
 
http://foxync.com/2583402/oklahoma-teen-mom-burns-babys-genitals-with-a-hair-straightening-iron/

Oklahoma Teen Mom Burns Baby’s Genitals With A Hair Straightening Iron
May 23, 2012 By Sha'Linda Jeanine

Rock was reportedly straightening her hair when she then decided to clamp her child’s testicles with the straightening iron she was using. The infant had three burn marks which started on the inside of his right thigh and reach his testicles. But this incident was not the first instance in which the child was abused.

Awww yea... tough guy LJ posting again about how crazy = feminism :rolleyes:

Gonna whop some ass LJ? Why don't you go find some women to beat the shit out of and get it over with? why are you being such a pussy about it?
 
Did the girls at school beat you up a lot LJ?

I bet they flipped your dress up so the other boys would see your panties
 
its cute how all the beta males and feminists try to label him as abusive and a woman hater for pointing out something that they dont like.
 
I fail to see the connection between a perpetrator of child abuse and the philosophical underpinnings of feminism.

However, I am a woman, and therefore by gender default, an unintelligent creature (lol). If I apply the perpetration of child abuse = feminism logic; then said logic also dictates, Saddam Hussein, convicted of heinous war crimes against humanity = all men are violent, mysoginistic abusers of human rights.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, in this instance.
 
Last edited:
its cute how all the beta males and feminists try to label him as abusive and a woman hater for pointing out something that they dont like.

I don't like it either...the bitch in the story is crazy.

I'm busting his balls for trying to equate it to feminism.
 
I fail to see the connection between a perpetrator of child abuse and the philosophical underpinnings of feminism.

However, I am a woman, and therefore by gender default, an unintelligent creature (lol). If I apply the perpetration of child abuse = feminism logic; then said logic also dictates, Saddam Hussein, convicted of heinous war crimes against humanity = all men are violent, mysoginistic abusers of human rights.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, in this instance.

Don't use logic, you'll confuse LT.

He has a hard-on for bashing women... but supposedly, he's happily married, go figure!
 
Awww yea... tough guy LJ posting again about how crazy = feminism :rolleyes:

Gonna whop some ass LJ? Why don't you go find some women to beat the shit out of and get it over with? why are you being such a pussy about it?

Because he is a pussy.

He is afraid of his own shadow.

DC went to meet him once and LT never showed, all he did was make excuses.

He's a bitch, nothing more.
 
However, I am a woman, and therefore by gender default, an unintelligent creature (lol). If I apply the perpetration of child abuse = feminism logic; then said logic also dictates, Saddam Hussein, convicted of heinous war crimes against humanity = all men are violent, mysoginistic abusers of human rights.
Well, he's not saying all women perpetuate child abuse, only feminists.

A better logical equivalency would be: Dick Cheney shot Harry Whittington in the face so carelessness with guns = Republicans
Or to take something in the news, paedophilia = college coaching
 
I fail to see the connection between a perpetrator of child abuse and the philosophical underpinnings of feminism.

However, I am a woman, and therefore by gender default, an unintelligent creature (lol). If I apply the perpetration of child abuse = feminism logic; then said logic also dictates, Saddam Hussein, convicted of heinous war crimes against humanity = all men are violent, mysoginistic abusers of human rights.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, in this instance.

You're new here. If you don't put the Lj(the poster formerly known as Lovingtongue), you'll see much more of this kind of stuff.

Lt has suffered a lot of abuse at the hands of women. This has reduced him to the bitter little misogynistic spider you see today.

Arguing with him is pointless, but it can be fun at times, if you think it's funny to call a blind puppy who doesn't know he's at the top of the stairs.
 
Awww yea... tough guy LJ posting again about how crazy = feminism :rolleyes:

Gonna whop some ass LJ? Why don't you go find some women to beat the shit out of and get it over with? why are you being such a pussy about it?
LOL get a spine you wimp.
 
Did the girls at school beat you up a lot LJ?

I bet they flipped your dress up so the other boys would see your panties
^^^^
Further proof that feminists despise hearing about their crimes more than the crime itself.

You're just mad that you never had a son to abuse and take out your feminist rage upon.
 
Last edited:
I fail to see the connection between a perpetrator of child abuse and the philosophical underpinnings of feminism.

However, I am a woman, and therefore by gender default, an unintelligent creature (lol). If I apply the perpetration of child abuse = feminism logic; then said logic also dictates, Saddam Hussein, convicted of heinous war crimes against humanity = all men are violent, mysoginistic abusers of human rights.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, in this instance.
But most feminists already believe all men are violent, misogynistic abusers of human rights.
 
Last edited:
its cute how all the beta males and feminists try to label him as abusive and a woman hater for pointing out something that they dont like.
Notice how everyone here hates the fact that I posted what this woman did? And not a SINGLE person has condemned the woman! Their responses are not about her abuse of a kid, it's all rage and piss and vinegar about me reporting it. LOL!
 
Last edited:
Or what Mr.Interwebz bad ass?? Gonna kick my ass?....lmfao...I wouldn't want to mess with the wrong hippie now would I? BAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....you so funny LJ


"I fear nothing on four legs, and damned sure nothing on two."

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRLK1pVQ1oHUdkXRA0-P-rzsCEjEwMCdN0NPaxTMi6rKRg33hHswUk_rW583A

The fact that you put that up as your sig.....says volumes LJ....volumes....
A strong wind will kick your ass, you puny little spineless wimp.
 
Notice how everyone here hates the fact that I posted what this woman did? And not a SINGLE person has condemned the woman! Their responses are not about her abuse of a kid, it's all rage and piss and vinegar about me reporting it. LOL!
Are you really that stupid? That you think the replies are about the fact you made a post about child abuse?
 
You're new here. If you don't put the Lj(the poster formerly known as Lovingtongue), you'll see much more of this kind of stuff.

Lt has suffered a lot of abuse at the hands of women. This has reduced him to the bitter little misogynistic spider you see today.

Arguing with him is pointless, but it can be fun at times, if you think it's funny to call a blind puppy who doesn't know he's at the top of the stairs.

Well put and needs repeating. I'm a newb but I have read the board for a while.
 
Back
Top