LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
The problem is nature itself has put 100% of the mating competition burden upon men. Which in turn causes unhealthy aggression.
Feminists need to stop raging at men and instead help us fight nature, which humans have been quite successful at doing (it's called civilization).
Women desire men with superior physical prowess, and that is fueling all the competition and the violence that inherently comes from that. This is beyond dispute. Men one-up each other in order to be more attractive. Eliminate that incentive and you cut down on the violence.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100513123835.htm
Patriarchy didn't create this. Patriarchy was the RESULT of this. Feminists, as usual, have a ass-backwards understanding of EVERYTHING.
Instead feminists should be listening to egalitarians when we tell them that competition for women, not hegemonic masculinity, is what's driving the world into the dirt.
Feminists need to stop raging at men and instead help us fight nature, which humans have been quite successful at doing (it's called civilization).
Women desire men with superior physical prowess, and that is fueling all the competition and the violence that inherently comes from that. This is beyond dispute. Men one-up each other in order to be more attractive. Eliminate that incentive and you cut down on the violence.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100513123835.htm
The reality is, to stop the male violence, we have to stop the mate competition. Stopping that means most women will no longer find men attractive, because it's a hard-wired biological thing. This is why MMA champions never have the same problems finding a woman who wants to be with him, as the average male chump. No man on Literotica is as desirable to large numbers of women as a famous and successful athlete. Not one.The main sticking point with human male competition compared to other species is that male humans do not possess inherent weapons.
"Other animals have antlers or long canines and claws," said Puts. "Why don't we have them?"
According to Puts, men do have weapons. They make them. Bows and arrows, spears, knives -- men have always manufactured weapons.
Other male traits also seem to imply competition. Males have thicker jawbones, which may have come from men hitting each other and the thickest-boned men surviving. Competition may explain why males have more robust skulls and brow ridges than women.
Patriarchy didn't create this. Patriarchy was the RESULT of this. Feminists, as usual, have a ass-backwards understanding of EVERYTHING.
Instead feminists should be listening to egalitarians when we tell them that competition for women, not hegemonic masculinity, is what's driving the world into the dirt.