More Faux News Mathematics

I think it's very likely that the same "scientists" had a hand in compiling the Rassmussen Poll results. I'm 120% sure of it.
 
Can't you have more than 100%? :confused:

Oh, that polling that totals more than 125 percent? What's wrong with that? Amicus, Zeb, JBJ, and 3Squares quote Cluster Fox on a daily basis as gospel truth....the kind of gospel truth spewing in the Saddleback Church by Rick Warren - Rachel Maddow has been following his efforts to get gays convicted and killed in Uganda......
So what is the problem if FAUX NEWS chooses to count 125 per cent as valid?
They regularly count 150 protesters as 500,000....is that a problem?
Mon Ami, 3Sales, and JBJ don't seem to think so.....they're pretty smart, right?
 
Now, don't be picking on the Cons. Things like numbers and truth confuse them so they just make up their own.
 
Oh, that polling that totals more than 125 percent? What's wrong with that? Amicus, Zeb, JBJ, and 3Squares quote Cluster Fox on a daily basis as gospel truth....the kind of gospel truth spewing in the Saddleback Church by Rick Warren - Rachel Maddow has been following his efforts to get gays convicted and killed in Uganda......
So what is the problem if FAUX NEWS chooses to count 125 per cent as valid?
They regularly count 150 protesters as 500,000....is that a problem?
Mon Ami, 3Sales, and JBJ don't seem to think so.....they're pretty smart, right?

Youre a lying son of a bitch! I rarely watch Fox and almost never quote it. I've said it before and repeat it now: You make shit up as you go along.
 
...I rarely watch Fox and almost never quote it.....

OMG! We (liberals) share common ground with you on that point. And many others:
The Bush failure, the evils of corporatism, the interest in the craft of writing... and I forget the other one.

Could you be on the verge of crossing over? Escaping from the Dark Side?

We're here to help, JBJ. Whenever you're ready.:)
 
Youre a lying son of a bitch! I rarely watch Fox and almost never quote it. I've said it before and repeat it now: You make shit up as you go along.

Struck a nerve, have we now? I've been called worse by better....but, considering the source; your instigating self; that's very high praise indeed...I'd be honored if you were one of those I admire on this forum....alas, not the case.....change your panties, sugarlips, they're all bunched up....

I stand by my statement...

You and the rest of the Neocon racist ganstas here have as little use for the truth as FAUX NEWS....and you do parrot their talking points on a regular basis.....
 
OMG! We (liberals) share common ground with you on that point. And many others:
The Bush failure, the evils of corporatism, the interest in the craft of writing... and I forget the other one.

Could you be on the verge of crossing over? Escaping from the Dark Side?

We're here to help, JBJ. Whenever you're ready.:)

Nice offer, but don't get your hopes up.....
 
... Amicus, Zeb, JBJ, and 3Squares quote Cluster Fox on a daily basis as gospel truth....

This is, of course, nothing more than your latest FLAT-OUT FABRICATION

and

BALD-FACED LIE. In case you missed that, I just called you a LIAR.


I defy you to find a single citation of Fox in any post I have ever written. Since I don't listen or view Fox, I already know the outcome of any effort you make to refute this assertion.

 
Last edited:
Obviously this poll, created by the climate scientists, proves global warming. Debate is over now, people. :)
 
Struck a nerve, have we now? I've been called worse by better....but, considering the source; your instigating self; that's very high praise indeed...I'd be honored if you were one of those I admire on this forum....alas, not the case.....change your panties, sugarlips, they're all bunched up....

I stand by my statement...

You and the rest of the Neocon racist ganstas here have as little use for the truth as FAUX NEWS....and you do parrot their talking points on a regular basis.....

Stand on your head for all I care, but you wont find much evidence to support your bullshit claim about me. So, youre a liar.
 
I defy you to find a single citation of Fox in any post I have ever written. Since I don't listen or view Fox, I already know the outcome of any effort you make to refute this assertion.

Which one of Amicus, Zeb, JBJ, and 3Squares are you? :confused:
 
Lordy,this reminds me of the guy that calls up and orders a Pizza.Pizza guy asks"You want us to cut it in 6 slices or 8 slices?" Customer says "Make it 6,there is no way I can eat 8 slices of Pizza".
 
You and the rest of the Neocon racist ganstas here have as little use for the truth as FAUX NEWS....and you do parrot their talking points on a regular basis.....

I think you have hit on the crux of the matter. Fox News talking points are like air - they're everywhere. As soon as they're released, they're parroted by all the right wing media, and much of mainstream media, and suddenly, Fox News talking points are seen as common knowledge (an oxymoron if there ever was one.) The fact that you hear them repeated almost verbatim does not necessarily imply that said conservative heard them directly from Fox News.
 
There are lies, damn lies and statistics.

What proportion of the general public, and what proportion of those who watch Fox News (or in the UK, read The Sun) understands percentages?

And what lesser proportion of those really understand the use and abuse of statistics and the caveats about the use of statistics?

The members of the Authors' Hangout and those who are the users of the Literotica website are better educated than the average of the population (see audience statistics about Literotica Here but note caveat).

Og
 
I wonder if those percentages should have been shown as one of the "circles" diagrams, where one circle can over-lap another ?
Oh forget it. I'm off to my bed.
 
So...

On a show that happens to be on Fox that is not a news show, but a morning gab and grab, a graphic was used that totaled to more than 100%.

Big deal. Shit happens.

Oh wait...this complaint from people who believe Manmade Global Warming is true and they have proof it's true.

Oh wait again...the data that all other conjecture of MGM is based on those figures out of the CRU that have now been exposed as a possible hoax by the climate scientist over there in the UK and here in the US.

And on a statistical note depending on the error rate of each sample the total could add up to more than 100%. Of course if you call 100 people and 59 answer one way and 35 answer another then you should have 6 that answered the third way. Unless they let people choose two answers, then of course you will have a percentage higher than 100%.

But I'm betting the unemployed person who drew up that graphic forgot to carry the two.
 
This is a poll with what should be mutually exclusive answers. You either find something very likely, somewhat likely or not very likely, but never all three (or even two of them) at once. Letting people chose more than one answer would bring down this poll's credibility all by itself.
 


This is, of course, nothing more than your latest FLAT-OUT FABRICATION

and

BALD-FACED LIE. In case you missed that, I just called you a LIAR.


I defy you to find a single citation of Fox in any post I have ever written. Since I don't listen or view Fox, I already know the outcome of any effort you make to refute this assertion.


My oh my! Such venom! With apologies to the Bard:
'Methinks thou doth protest too much. Ifeth thy foot has step'd in shit, then a shitty trail will be left...'
Write it a foot high...it won't change my contention nor will it make you innocent. Only the truth can set you free....and your credibility is zilch. Here's why:
You can flame all ya want but when you consistently - over the course of time - parrot FAUX NEWS 'talking points' and link to the same sources they use for their 'research (not to mention cutting and pasting nonsense and trying to pass it off as some infantile justification for your misguided obsession)'; it only lets the rest of us know where you do your homework....Maybe, just maybe, you're getting there on your own (that's an even scarier thought!) but I suspect you're relying on the same nutjobs and teabaggers (Sister Sarah is one of y'all now!) that Cluster Fox uses.....
Another fabrication that you promote: You don't and never have 'written'....you cut and paste.....useful skill that most of us mastered and left in kindergarten....but don't try to tell me you're 'writing'.....Writing and expression involve neural activity.....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top