More Democrat symbols over substance

[bellisarius]

War Powers Vote.

A vote which will have as much meaning as resolving "to support the soap box derby."

They're getting sillier by the day.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Meanwhile, in reality, a measure to prohibit funds for an unconstitutional war with Iran passed by a bipartisan 251-member vote in the House of Representatives last year. It was later stripped from the National Defense Authorization Act enacted in December to get it through the GOP lead Senate.

And we have Sanders who has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of funds for military force against Iran.

Read it here

If you are arguing that the Congress asserting its constitutional power is silly, then I suppose it is in keeping with all of you unpatriotic, America-hating right wingers.

 

[icanhelp1]

Meanwhile, in reality, a measure to prohibit funds for an unconstitutional war with Iran passed by a bipartisan 251-member vote in the House of Representatives last year. It was later stripped from the National Defense Authorization Act enacted in December to get it through the GOP lead Senate.

And we have Sanders who has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of funds for military force against Iran.

Read it here

If you are arguing that the Congress asserting its constitutional power is silly, then I suppose it is in keeping with all of you unpatriotic, America-hating right wingers.

Then we should pull out the marines at our embassy and replace them with house democrats.

 

[Rightguide]

War Powers Vote.

A vote which will have as much meaning as resolving "to support the soap box derby."

They're getting sillier by the day.

It won't mean shit, just like the last one they tried.

 

[Rightguide]

Meanwhile, in reality, a measure to prohibit funds for an unconstitutional war with Iran passed by a bipartisan 251-member vote in the House of Representatives last year. It was later stripped from the National Defense Authorization Act enacted in December to get it through the GOP lead Senate.

And we have Sanders who has introduced a bill to prohibit the use of funds for military force against Iran.

Read it here

If you are arguing that the Congress asserting its constitutional power is silly, then I suppose it is in keeping with all of you unpatriotic, America-hating right wingers.

It will get stripped out again. How come Democrats didn't give a shit about it when Clinton went to war in Kosovo, or when Obama went into Syria and Libya?

 

[Comshaw]

War Powers Vote.

A vote which will have as much meaning as resolving "to support the soap box derby."

They're getting sillier by the day.

Of course it will, when the Republican majority in the Senate still have their noses firmly up Trumps ass. But it seems that's starting to change:

GOP Sen. Mike Lee furious after an 'insulting' Senate briefing on Trump's Iran strike: 'The worst briefing ... on a military issue I've seen in 9 years'

Personally I've never agreed with the War Powers act. I don't care if it's a Democratic or Republican president, I think it gives the POTUS way to much power to get us into a war. That power should be the exclusive area of congress.

But then I've never been one to use a double standard to justiy that which I want to believe.



Comoshaw

 

[BotanyBoy]

Soooo Democrats jump to protect Iran and it's Islamo-fascist regime....that's not really shocking, at all.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Of course it will, when the Republican majority in the Senate still have their noses firmly up Trumps ass. But it seems that's starting to change:

GOP Sen. Mike Lee furious after an 'insulting' Senate briefing on Trump's Iran strike: 'The worst briefing ... on a military issue I've seen in 9 years'

Personally I've never agreed with the War Powers act. I don't care if it's a Democratic or Republican president, I think it gives the POTUS way to much power to get us into a war. That power should be the exclusive area of congress.

But then I've never been one to use a double standard to justiy that which I want to believe.



Comoshaw

Libertarians like Lee and Paul being against war at all cost isn't a new thing.....they've were equally as critical of Obama's military activities. So no they aren't "starting" to come around, they've been that way for quite a while.

Most (D)'s called them Loonytarians and Glibertarians while they were defending Obamas decision to summarily execute a US citizen via air strike.

 

[bellisarius]

I'm getting a kick out of their "new" talking point. "IMMINENT THREAT" What a bag of burned out dildos.

Was bin Laden an "imminent threat" hiding in Pakistan? Was Bahdadi an "imminent threat?" I guess this deceased terrorist was "special." A democrat party donor maybe?

These are the same pieces of shit that would gleefully pass a "Red Flag" law if they could.

"Imminent Threat" my ass.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'm getting a kick out of their "new" talking point. "IMMINENT THREAT" What a bag of burned out dildos.

Was bin Laden an "imminent threat" hiding in Pakistan? Was Bahdadi an "imminent threat?" I guess this deceased terrorist was "special." A democrat party donor maybe?

These are the same pieces of shit that would gleefully pass a "Red Flag" law if they could.

"Imminent Threat" my ass.

Don't forget the American kid Obama summarily executed with drone strike, that didn't need eminent threat.

AMUF is only for Democrat presidents don't ya know.

 

[Rightguide]

Of course it will, when the Republican majority in the Senate still have their noses firmly up Trumps ass. But it seems that's starting to change:

GOP Sen. Mike Lee furious after an 'insulting' Senate briefing on Trump's Iran strike: 'The worst briefing ... on a military issue I've seen in 9 years'

Personally I've never agreed with the War Powers act. I don't care if it's a Democratic or Republican president, I think it gives the POTUS way to much power to get us into a war. That power should be the exclusive area of congress.

But then I've never been one to use a double standard to justiy that which I want to believe.



Comoshaw

Listen and get educated. The Speaker Of the House is proposing a concurrrent resolution to limit the President's war making authority. Take the time to read Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha 462 U.S. 919 (1983), In which the SCOTUS ruled on Congressional resolutions as being:

"constitutionally invalid, unenforceable, and not binding. Congress may not promulgate a statute granting to itself a legislative veto over actions of the executive branch inconsistent with the bicameralism principle and Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution."

In other words Pelosi's resolution to limit the authority of the Executive is on its face unconstitutional.

 

[HisArpy]

Listen and get educated. The Speaker Of the House is proposing a concurrrent resolution to limit the President's war making authority. Take the time to read Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha 462 U.S. 919 (1983), In which the SCOTUS ruled on Congressional resolutions as being:

"constitutionally invalid, unenforceable, and not binding. Congress may not promulgate a statute granting to itself a legislative veto over actions of the executive branch inconsistent with the bicameralism principle and Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution."

In other words Pelosi's resolution to limit the authority of the Executive is on its face unconstitutional.

The problem is that the Democrats A) Don't care; B) Won't acknowledge the law; C) Keep their followers too stupid to realize that the Democrats are acting illegally and unconstitutionally.

When you support lawlessness, don't be surprised when it shows up at your door demanding that you hand over all your stuff. Because you won't need it where you're going.

 

[icanhelp1]

I'm getting a kick out of their "new" talking point. "IMMINENT THREAT" What a bag of burned out dildos.

Was bin Laden an "imminent threat" hiding in Pakistan? Was Bahdadi an "imminent threat?" I guess this deceased terrorist was "special." A democrat party donor maybe?

These are the same pieces of shit that would gleefully pass a "Red Flag" law if they could.

"Imminent Threat" my ass.

BAG OF BURNED OUT DILDOS

 

[Rightguide]

I'm getting a kick out of their "new" talking point. "IMMINENT THREAT" What a bag of burned out dildos.

Was bin Laden an "imminent threat" hiding in Pakistan? Was Bahdadi an "imminent threat?" I guess this deceased terrorist was "special." A democrat party donor maybe?

These are the same pieces of shit that would gleefully pass a "Red Flag" law if they could.

"Imminent Threat" my ass.

The only "imminent threats" I see are resident on the left side of the aisle in the US Congress.

 

[bellisarius]

The only "imminent threats" I see are resident on the left side of the aisle in the US Congress.

Threats to Freedom, Liberty, and Opportunity.

 

[Conager]

When NiggerHO! and CuntClinton attacked Libya

PussyPelosi said there was NO NEED for Congressional authorization

https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1215386455654137856

 

[Rightguide]

https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1215386455654137856

Only a Democrat is allowed to wield true Presidential power.

 

[Saint Peter]

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/war-powers-4.jpg

 

[Conager]

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/war-powers-4.jpg

More Democrats acknowledged that this is a stupid idea than Republicans and independents thought it was a good idea

 

[bellisarius]

Voting on a non-binding resolution is the congressional equivalent of "liking" or "not liking" a tweet. In that respect one might say congress was way ahead of the curve.

 

[BotanyBoy]

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/war-powers-4.jpg

Ohhh (D)'s make sure everyone knows, they'll do what they can to protect their constituency in Iran over their own citizenry.

Voting on a non-binding resolution is the congressional equivalent of "liking" or "not liking" a tweet. In that respect one might say congress was way ahead of the curve.

They're feeding Trump ammo for the campaign, they just can't help themselves.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Then we should pull out the marines at our embassy and replace them with house democrats.

lol...

 

[SpeareChucker]

Voting on a non-binding resolution is the congressional equivalent of "liking" or "not liking" a tweet. In that respect one might say congress was way ahead of the curve.

*chuckle*