Minnesota whackos denied....No Guns allowed at State Fair

[WillJ8787]

Source:
https://kstp.com/entertainment/judg...o-allow-guns-at-minnesota-state-fair/6218187/


One has to wonder why, when it is State Fair time in Minnesota, that the first thing that comes to mind with these ignorant whackos is not...

Enjoying a corn dog
Taking a ride on an amusement
Enjoying an apple pie
Taking in the sites and the "mostly" wonderful folks of Minnesota

Nope...first thought they have is...."why can't I carry my gun into a State Fair?"

Well, this Judge has some common sense...Guns denied!!!

 

[CornusKousa]

Source:
https://kstp.com/entertainment/judg...o-allow-guns-at-minnesota-state-fair/6218187/


One has to wonder why, when it is State Fair time in Minnesota, that the first thing that comes to mind with these ignorant whackos is not...

Enjoying a corn dog
Taking a ride on an amusement
Enjoying an apple pie
Taking in the sites and the "mostly" wonderful folks of Minnesota

Nope...first thought they have is...."why can't I carry my gun into a State Fair?"

Well, this Judge has some common sense...Guns denied!!!

What's common sense about denying people their civil rights??

Just another (D) judge undermining and destroying the liberal values the USA was founded on.

 

[Rightguide]

It's Minnesota, a totalitarian state, probably harboring Islamic terrorists, their operational plans require a free hand and safe passage through the fair grounds.

 

[WillJ8787]

It's Minnesota, a totalitarian state, probably harboring Islamic terrorists, their operational plans require a free hand and safe passage through the fair grounds.

No such civil rights extend into the State Fairgrounds....as the judge has correctly ruled.

In her decision, Nelson ruled that fair organizers have the power to "license and regulate...privileges on the fairgrounds[.]," and are "further empowered" by state statute to make rules consistent with law it considers necessary for the "protection, health, safety and comfort of the public on the Fairgrounds."

The judge also said the late filing of the injunction request factored into her decision to deny, writing: "the Plaintiffs have long been aware of the Society’s position on guns at the State Fair and that their extensive delay undercuts their claim of irreparable harm."

Gun owners argue the ban violates state law and the Second Amendment.

And why do you two traitors use the 2nd Amendment of the USA "Federal" Constitution to justify your want of criminal.gun carry behavior when you both believe...the Federal Govt is defunct? You cannot make a rational argument saying on the one hand it is defunct and on the other hand, it is not, and it grants you the absolute right to carry a gun anywhere you choose.

 

[CornusKousa]

It's Minnesota, a totalitarian state, probably harboring Islamic terrorists, their operational plans require a free hand and safe passage through the fair grounds.

The Twin Cities and the (D) cancer surrounding it are fucking psychotic...LOL

 

[CornusKousa]

No such civil rights extend into the State Fairgrounds....as the judge has correctly ruled.

In her decision, Nelson ruled that fair organizers have the power to "license and regulate...privileges on the fairgrounds[.]," and are "further empowered" by state statute to make rules consistent with law it considers necessary for the "protection, health, safety and comfort of the public on the Fairgrounds."

The judge also said the late filing of the injunction request factored into her decision to deny, writing: "the Plaintiffs have long been aware of the Society’s position on guns at the State Fair and that their extensive delay undercuts their claim of irreparable harm."

Sure it does, the Constitution says so.

The Judge was wrong.

Nobody's civil rights should end where other peoples fee fees begin.

Gun owners argue the ban violates state law and the Second Amendment.

Yea, because duh.

And why do you two traitors

When was I ever convicted of treason??

Oh right you're just a liar.

use the 2nd Amendment of the USA "Federal" Constitution to justify your want of criminal.gun carry behavior

Nothing criminal about carrying a gun.

when you both believe...the Federal Govt is defunct?

Believe? The article PROVES it's defunct.

There are NO federal civil rights anymore and "justice" is entirely at the partisan discursion of whoever the elected officials of a given jurisdiction are.

2A, 1A, 4A and 14A don't exist in blue states for example.

You cannot make a rational argument saying on the one hand it is defunct and on the other hand, it is not, and it grants you the absolute right to carry a gun anywhere you choose.

It's not meant to be rational, it's meant to be a middle finger pointing to your hatred of the union of our states, the USA.

What grants people the absolute right to carry a gun anywhere they chose is the fact that they can and do.

 

[jaF0]

Now how they gonna shoot the little duckies of'n their motorized perches down ta' the midway?????


https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/37/94/99/379499522192e5594015fe395feb97f0.jpg


.

 

[phrodeau]

And Trump was going to show up.

Ah well, you can still get Ivermectin at the Moo Booth.

 

[WillJ8787]

Sure it does, the Constitution says so.

The Judge was wrong.

Nobody's civil rights should end where other peoples fee fees begin.




Yea, because duh.



When was I ever convicted of treason??

Oh right you're just a liar.



Nothing criminal about carrying a gun.



Believe? The article PROVES it's defunct.

There are NO federal civil rights anymore and "justice" is entirely at the partisan discursion of whoever the elected officials of a given jurisdiction are.

2A, 1A, 4A and 14A don't exist in blue states for example.



It's not meant to be rational, it's meant to be a middle finger pointing to your hatred of the union of our states, the USA.

What grants people the absolute right to carry a gun anywhere they chose is the fact that they can and do.

and this is why nobody, And I mean nobody, listens to you....blah, blah, blah, blah.

 

[Rightguide]

And why do you two traitors use the 2nd Amendment of the USA "Federal" Constitution to justify your want of criminal.gun carry behavior when you both believe...the Federal Govt is defunct? You cannot make a rational argument saying on the one hand it is defunct and on the other hand, it is not, and it grants you the absolute right to carry a gun anywhere you choose.

The constitution is not a product of the federal government, it existed before the government and is apart from, and beyond, the government, it stands alone. It belongs to us, it is our testament and consent to be governed and under what conditions and restraints we will allow ourselves to be governed. The black letter of the Constitution declares we have the right to keep and bear arms and that the right shall not be infringed.

 

[pecksniff]

The constitution is not a product of the federal government, it existed before the government and is apart from, and beyond, the government, it stands alone. It belongs to us, it is our testament and consent to be governed and under what conditions and restraints we will allow ourselves to be governed. The black letter of the Constitution declares we have the right to keep and bear arms and that the right shall not be infringed.

Yeah, well, that doesn't mean anywhere and everywhere. It's the same with the First Amendment -- the courts allow for time, place and manner restrictions.

 

[adrina]

Yeah, well, that doesn't mean anywhere and everywhere. It's the same with the First Amendment -- the courts allow for time, place and manner restrictions.

You're indulging his tripe. The constitution is not separate and doesn't stand alone. It is the foundation of our government.

Hysteria by way of platitudes - the conservative way.

 

[WillJ8787]

Yeah, well, that doesn't mean anywhere and everywhere. It's the same with the First Amendment -- the courts allow for time, place and manner restrictions.

It's absolutist thinking except when they feel an exception needs to be made.

Also, The Constitution is meaningless unless you have a "governing body" to make sure it is applied and enforced.

Otherwise, you have exactly what these ignoramuses want... individual sovereign interpretations....which negates a collective understanding and application...in other words Anarchy.

 

[pecksniff]

Why would anyone want to bring a gun to a fair anyway?

 

[WillJ8787]

You're indulging his tripe. The constitution is not separate and doesn't stand alone. It is the foundation of our government.

Hysteria by way of platitudes - the conservative way.

Yes...what Adrina said...

 

[WillJ8787]

Why would anyone want to bring a gun to a fair anyway?

Fear....of blacks, the other

Also, criminals project criminal thinking....

 

[Rightguide]

Yes...what Adrina said...

Read the preamble you dummies.

 

[CornusKousa]

and this is why nobody, And I mean nobody, listens to you....blah, blah, blah, blah.

You couldn't even attempt to reute anything. Noted

 

[pecksniff]

Read the preamble you dummies.

The single most important passage of which is "promote the general welfare," followed by "insure domestic tranquility."

 

[pecksniff]

Why would anyone want to bring a gun to a fair anyway?

Though I suppose a fair might include a gun show. Depends on the state.

 

[WillJ8787]

The single most important passage of which is "promote the general welfare," followed by "insure domestic tranquility."

Yes...it does not say promote individual welfare and the individual good!

The folks who wrote this document chose and debated their words very careful over a period of time...the were not an bunch of bumblers like we have here.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Some serious triggering in this thread. Well done, William. Take a bow.

 

[CornusKousa]

The single most important passage of which is "promote the general welfare," followed by "insure domestic tranquility."

Both things the left is openly and actively seeking the destruction of.

By undermining and destroying the parts where rights of individuals are confirmed.

Yes...it does not say promote individual welfare and the individual good!

Doesn't matter.

BoR does say the individual.

The folks who wrote this document chose and debated their words very careful over a period of time...the were not an bunch of bumblers like we have here.

Funny you do a 180 when it comes to individual rights.

You like Peck and Rob are just another authoritarian leftist control freak, promoting the undermining of individual liberty of the citizens and national sovereignty of the USA.

Anti-Americans gotta try and destroy the USA.

 

[WillJ8787]

Some serious triggering in this thread. Well done, William. Take a bow.

Thank you, thank you very much

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Bumpers cars without ma gun? No thank you.