Media doesn't think Cali so-called "travel ban" absurd, praises it

[renard_ruse]

Wow, just wow.

One media report even claimed California's bizarre, divisive, and arguably unconstitutional boycott of states over a few petty side issues in the gay agenda question is the "moral high ground."

Putting aside the abject stupidity of claiming homosexuality is the "moral high ground," I thought it was the worst thing in the world to "impose your morals on others." Isn't that what by its own admission California is trying to do?

 

[about_average]

What is this "gay agenda" you refer too?

Who claimed that "homosexuality is the moral high ground"?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

What is this "gay agenda" you refer too?

Who claimed that "homosexuality is the moral high ground"?

Here's Renny's weekly checklist of high anxieties:

1) the blacks
2) the gays/lesbians/bisexuals/transgenders/alternative sexuality lifestyles
3) the "femanists"
4) the War On White People/Genocide Of White Culture
4.5) the War On Men/Genocide Of (Heterosexual) Men's Rights
5) the other assorted brown-skinned peoples on Earth with funny-sounding names, scary home countries with large insects and weird foods invading 'Merica
6) the liberals and/or Democrats
7) pineapple on pizza
8) Leave It To Beaver parody pornography
9) Sofia Coppola movies
10) the dearth of PokéStops in his neighborhood

Just keep the first three or four in constant rotation and you pretty much got what keeps his daily diapers full.

 

[nowisthetime]

What is this "gay agenda" you refer too?

Who claimed that "homosexuality is the moral high ground"?

He's always ranting about some gay agenda. Like I said, people who rant so much about gays either have secret closet feelings or were molested by someone of the same sex.

He wants to go back to a time in place where people who didn't look like him were seen but not heard.

 

[Hypoxia]

What travel ban? Nobody is prevented from going anywhere. They just can't spend *public* money is the proscribed places. The state has a right (and duty) to determine how its public money is spent, right? If a California pol wants a dope-n-whore junket in NeverNeverLand, they can pay for it themself, not with their gov't expense account.

 

[HisArpy]

What travel ban? Nobody is prevented from going anywhere. They just can't spend *public* money is the proscribed places. The state has a right (and duty) to determine how its public money is spent, right? If a California pol wants a dope-n-whore junket in NeverNeverLand, they can pay for it themself, not with their gov't expense account.

Let's say that there's a company in one of those "banned" states who wants to bid on a State contract. (Like the contract to repair the spillway damage at Oroville dam.) They can't be given the contract under this law even if the company is the low bidder. So the State, and the residents via higher taxes, pay more for those contracts.

And yet you think it's a good idea to cost the citizens money because of some asinine political squabble about out-of-state bathroom preferences?