Maybe Clinton shouldn't use her NY jobs plan as an eample

about_average

Literotica Guru
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Posts
11,430
SAY YOU LOVE HER AND THAT SHE'S PERFECT OR YOU'RE SEXIST!!! :mad::mad:
 

The Clintons are arch neoliberals. A cornerstone of neoliberal economics is to maintain a high rate of unemployment and to keep those (deliberately) unemployed at incomes well below the poverty line.

They pretend that it's all about 'fighting inflation' but the reality is that it's all about class war, driving real wages down, the wage share of national income down and thus increasing the profits of the very very wealthy.

The Clintons are well to the right of Reagan. They don't care about jobs.
 
The Clintons are arch neoliberals. A cornerstone of neoliberal economics is to maintain a high rate of unemployment and to keep those (deliberately) unemployed at incomes well below the poverty line.

They pretend that it's all about 'fighting inflation' but the reality is that it's all about class war, driving real wages down, the wage share of national income down and thus increasing the profits of the very very wealthy.

The Clintons are well to the right of Reagan. They don't care about jobs.
Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
 
Just too bad you don't even know what neoliberalism is, if you're ascribing it to Clinton. Trump is closer to the mark.

Trump is a showman, a conman and a mediocre bidnizz man. He's supported neoliberal and neoCons in the past because they help his bottom line. But I don't see him personally as a neo anything...the guy has practically no policy or policy opinions other than Hillary bad.

As much as I despise UnderDouche1 he's spot on about Clinton, she is the quintessential neoliberal scumbag.

She talks shit and dresses everything up as helping the working class. Just like Obama none of it is true and she will whore the public good out to private corporate interest at some insane price the middle/lower class will end up paying for. She will let big pharma dictate drug policy, she will protect Monsantos right to poison people among many other fucked up things with total impunity, she will wage wars both foreign and domestic intentionally for the reason of profiteering.

And (D)'s will love her like she is the 2nd coming of Christ no matter how much shit she shovels on them.

Now say you love Hillary and that you're with her or you're a SEXIST!!! :mad::mad:


:D
 
Last edited:
Clinton is in the pocket of wall street, but she's not a neoliberal at all. She's not for no regulation, completely free markets, etc. All characteristics of a neoliberal, like Reagan.
 
Clinton is in the pocket of wall street, but she's not a neoliberal at all. She's not for no regulation, completely free markets, etc. All characteristics of a neoliberal, like Reagan.

Neoliberals aren't for across the board no regulation/completely free markets. That's your libertarian/anarchist capitalism.

The NeoLib/Con crowd are for SELECTIVELY deregulated/free markets.

Free for me but not for thee...:D

This is how they manage to extract sooooooooo much fucking wealth from the lower 95% and bloat the upper crust into what it is today.

From Halliburton and Monsanto to Wall St. the examples of them flat out being above the law and treating the rest of the country like their personal piggy bank are near endless. From subsidies and exemptions to flat out going to Congress and getting a cool trillion after they crash the fucker.

And Hillary has a LONG history of supporting this. She says differently now on the campaign trail after she had to cheat to beat a half fossilized socialist. But I'd bet the farm that's just like Obama's hope and change. Nothing but talk and she goes right to letting her billionaire buddies rat fuck the US economy/citizens as soon as she's in office.

With Hillary in office I think the probability of the rich getting richer while the upper middle class stagnates and the middle class/poor get poorer is almost a certainty. She is the status quo, 4 more years of the same ol' shit.
 
Last edited:
Just too bad you don't even know what neoliberalism is, if you're ascribing it to Clinton. Trump is closer to the mark.

I've written papers on neoliberalism, champ. Clinton is an archetypical neoliberal.

Too bad for you.
 
Is there anything that anyone could say that wouldn't make you reach for the strawman tactic?

Yea plenty of people have civil conversations with me every day. They usually talk to me like a human being instead just talking shit and making radical assumptions about me.

It's called a civil discussion, you should try it sometime.
 
Yea plenty of people have civil conversations with me every day. They usually talk to me like a human being instead just talking shit and making radical assumptions about me.

It's called a civil discussion, you should try it sometime.

Right, so now the projection starts and you whine that the person you've abused is being 'uncivil' to you.

You're an archetypical wingnut.
 
Right, so now the projection starts and you whine that the person you've abused is being 'uncivil' to you.

You're an archetypical wingnut.

I've abused you?

OHHHHHHH EVER THE VICTIM!!! LOL

Except I'm not even a wingnut.

Look man you can quit being a prick and talk to me like an adult or not, makes no difference to me.

I'll return the favor either way, the choice is yours any time you want to change.
 
I've abused you?

OHHHHHHH EVER THE VICTIM!!! LOL

Look man you can quit being a prick and talk to me like an adult or not, makes no difference to me.

I'll return the favor either way, the choice is yours any time you want to change.

I've tried quite a few times now and you've failed to respond in kind.

You're a strawman builder. In my view that usually means that involves having no real intellectual understanding of the issues.

With all due respect, I think I'm probably just a lot older, far more experienced and a lost smarter than you.

And you could never admit any sort of 'defeat' at all.

I've never, ever, in my entire life, met anyone who likes guns like you do, that I could muster any intellectual respect for.

Not because they liked guns but because of the person they were.

So there you go.
 
I've tried quite a few times now and you've failed to respond in kind.

I've not seen you try once. It's been condescending presumptions since moment 1.

You're a strawman builder. In my view that usually means that involves having no real intellectual understanding of the issues.

You confuse hyperbole with strawman building. Probably due to your huge intellect:rolleyes:

You're a LOST smarter than me after all.:D

With all due respect, I think I'm probably just a lot older, far more experienced and a lost smarter than you.

LMFAO yea...right on buddy.

IAnd you could never admit any sort of 'defeat' at all.

I've stood corrected numerous times on this board and had no problem ever admitting it. But it takes more than some arrogance for me to admit I'm wrong, you have to back up your arguments.

II've never, ever, in my entire life, met anyone who likes guns like you do, that I could muster any intellectual respect for.

Really? You must not have spent any time in the USA then. Either that or you're just a bigot against gun owners.

INot because they liked guns but because of the person they were.

So there you go.

Oh it's because they like guns. That's why you've assumed I was a simple teahaddist and looked down your nose at me from the get go. You probably think I'm a staunch Christian right winger too don't ya? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I've not seen you try once. It's been condescending presumptions since moment 1.



You confuse hyperbole with strawman building. Probably due to your huge intellect:rolleyes:

You're a LOST smarter than me after all.:D



LMFAO yea...right on buddy.



I've stood corrected numerous times on this board and had no problem ever admitting it. But it takes more than some arrogance for me to admit I'm wrong, you have to back up your arguments.



Really? You must not have spent any time in the USA then. Either that or you're just a bigot against gun owners.



Oh it's because they like guns. That's why you've assumed I was a simple teahaddist and looked down your nose at me from the get go. You probably think I'm a staunch Christian right winger too don't ya? :rolleyes:

You really don't get this argument thing at all do you?

You never conceded that oligarchs are capitalists. You're still trying to peddle this inane idea that capitalists are small businessmen.

You're a fucking idiot.
 
You really don't get this argument thing at all do you?

Condescending assholery :rolleyes:

You never conceded that oligarchs are capitalists.

Because they aren't, they are oligarchs.

Force of government changes their asshole classifier.

Words mean things.

You're still trying to peddle this inane idea that capitalists are small businessmen.

I've never so much as implied that.

You're a fucking idiot.

And there is the childish name calling again. You're a SPECIAL one aren't you? :D
 
Back
Top