Mass Murder/Hate Crime

[Boxlicker101]

I wonder if we'll hear and read as much about these murders as we did about the shooting in Charleston. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/18/fresno-shooting-spree-3-people-killed-suspect-in-custody.html

 

[sr71plt]

I wonder if we'll hear and read as much about these murders as we did about the shooting in Charleston. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/18/fresno-shooting-spree-3-people-killed-suspect-in-custody.html

Yes, it's being fully covered by the media. It's a bit different from Charleston, in that he refrained from killing two women and a toddler and Charleston killer mowed them all down who were there, killing more than this guy did.

However, the real question is what prejudice has caused you to ask the question?

 

[Chris_Michael]

Yes, it's being fully covered by the media. It's a bit different from Charleston, in that he refrained from killing two women and a toddler and Charleston killer mowed them all down who were there, killing more than this guy did.

However, the real question is what prejudice has caused you to ask the question?

Is it prejudice to question a prejudice crime? What prejudice has caused you to think his question was prejudice?

 

[sr71plt]

Try to use your brain. He questioned the media coverage of the crime--assuming that the media wouldn't cover a black-on-white crime like it would cover a white-on-black crime. Other then involving race, the two crimes aren't that similar or on the same scale. The media HAS fully covered this crime.

You're just being your usual disgusting hate monger.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Is it prejudice to question a prejudice crime?

Yes....but only when the prejudice crime was committed by a (D) protected class.

Kinda like all the worst places for women, gays and other minorities are all run by those protected class's who can NEVER under any circumstances be wrong or do bad things, no matter how blatant.

 

[Chris_Michael]

But questioning the media's coverage of a race related hate crime doesn't necessarily mean that he has a prejudice view, does it? If you think the media has covered the crime in an unbiased mannor, why not just state that, explaining why, and let the answer stand on its own merit?

Why does there have to be a prejudice motive to ask if the media will cover a hate crime unbiasedly? With the state our media is in, we always have to question the media's portrayal of the story, don't we?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Yes, it's being fully covered by the media. It's a bit different from Charleston, in that he refrained from killing two women and a toddler and Charleston killer mowed them all down who were there, killing more than this guy did.

However, the real question is what prejudice has caused you to ask the question?

I don't know if you would call it a prejudice or not, but I do believe the MSM, for the most part, has a strong leftist bias. Both cases should be called hate crimes but, since this was a black person, who is calling himself a Muslim, murdering four white males, there will be less said about it.

The two cases should be considered to be very similar - murder motivated by racial hatred - but this was four separate crimes and the Charleston spree was really only one crime. In both cases, the killers deserve hanging, and Roof has been so sentenced, but I believe the Fresno killer will get off easier. If Moonbeam is still the gov. when the case goes to trial, he is liable to get away with his heinous crimes.