Man gets 315 years prison for child porn crimes

JackLuis

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Posts
21,881
I realize this isn't erotic but thought it would serve as a warning to real perverts, not AH'er of course.

WASHINGTON — A man in the midwestern US state of Indiana was sentenced to 315 years behind bars for producing and distributing child pornography, the Justice Department said Tuesday.

David Bostic, 25, “committed heinous acts of sexual abuse against the most vulnerable in our society,” said Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer with the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.

Maybe it would be more effective on the GB?
 
Last edited:
That would make him eligible for parole in 2070 ... unless the sentences run concurrently. :D

He's not going to have an easy time of it in the slammer either. In the prisoner pecking order he's just about at the bottom. There's a lot of giant murderers in there with kids of their own. ;)
 
I live in Indiana - for every 1 day you serve you are actually serving 2. So he'll be out in 157 1/2 years.
 
did he actually do something to a child

Or was this a crime of just having images on his computer? To me that makes a big difference.
 
Or was this a crime of just having images on his computer? To me that makes a big difference.
He took the pictures. You can read some very horrific details in the link that JL has so kindly provided.

You know, the problem with "just having the photos on his computer" is that somewhere there is a real child who was really molested to provide those pictures.*

It's a little bit like "just having" pieces of ivory, or cheetah fur, or slave-produced diamonds. However far away you are from the slaughter of the animals, or the misery of the slaves, the actions are still part of why you have what you have.

*Shota comics excepted
 
He took the pictures. You can read some very horrific details in the link that JL has so kindly provided.

You know, the problem with "just having the photos on his computer" is that somewhere there is a real child who was really molested to provide those pictures.*

It's a little bit like "just having" pieces of ivory, or cheetah fur, or slave-produced diamonds. However far away you are from the slaughter of the animals, or the misery of the slaves, the actions are still part of why you have what you have.

*Shota comics excepted

I got to agree if you have child porn you are just as guilty as the person who subjecting the child to it. if you had not bought or provided the need for the image then that child would not live a life knowing that their molestation and rape is out there for any pervert to use for there sexual satisfaction!

It would be like being raped every day of your life because you cant control where the pictures or videos go or who sees them! your friend coworkers neighbors total strangers and guaranteed the lowest scum of the earth. I am all for consenting adults doing whatever they want to do as long as the children are kept out of it.

maybe Im a prude but I garendamnT that I would kill any sorry pervert who tried to hurt any child I know or not for that matter. there are plenty of adults more then willing to do a wide range of sexual acts in any number of twisted and bazaar ways... (just read a few sites like this one) there is no reason to involve children in the debauchery!

find a willing adult and have fun!
 
Good on Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer for cleaning up Indiana's living piece of shit and help throwing away the key.



Or was this a crime of just having images on his computer? To me that makes a big difference.

Not to the kid that was raped for pictures so some other monster can relive the disgusting atrocity and get off on a child's misery. It's the same fucking thing, just as heinous.
 
I dunno . . . I've seen plenty of porn in which I'm fairly certain that the adults involved only consented in the most technical sense of the word, forced into the position (and the positions) by poverty and a lack of available work in their home countries, pretending with mixed success to be enjoying it. I've never told the people on this site who link that stuff that they're sick for enjoying it, though I have been tempted to. (Yes, children are more vulnerable, but as far as I'm concerned, sexual exploitation is sexual exploitation, regardless of the age of those involved. I can't condemn everyone who watches it, so I'll just condemn everyone who personally facilitates it.)

Then again, if this guy was actually photographing it, I'm still willing to call him scum.
 
I think I'd be tempted to appeal his sentence and persuade Indiana to let him serve one for two, so it could be a bit longer before his exit from Jail. I think the guards should turn the Nelsonian eye to any chance of his being 'corrected' by other prisoners; some of those kids were too young for school.

A death sentence is too good for blokes like him, but it is a nice thought
[ straight to Hell; do not pas GO, do not collect two hundred dollars ].
 
Last edited:
Yes good for the Attorney General. The Indiana tax payers will be thrilled to keep this animal in food clothing and cable the rest of his life

This is proof positive of why we need the death penalty.
 
Yes good for the Attorney General. The Indiana tax payers will be thrilled to keep this animal in food clothing and cable the rest of his life

This is proof positive of why we need the death penalty.

Plumb centre. The only problem is HOW ?
Gas can be as dangerous for everyone else as for the criminal (and I gather it can get real messy).
Electricity can be a trifle tricky.
Injection requires someone to put the neede in right
[it also requires the right chemicals]
Hanging takes skill and judgement to do it right
Beheading is real messy.

Got any thoughts ?
 
Plumb centre. The only problem is HOW ?
Gas can be as dangerous for everyone else as for the criminal (and I gather it can get real messy).
Electricity can be a trifle tricky.
Injection requires someone to put the neede in right
[it also requires the right chemicals]
Hanging takes skill and judgement to do it right
Beheading is real messy.

Got any thoughts ?

How about being left in a room for ten minutes with some fathers whose children have been molested. It would be cheap, effective and great therapy for the men involved.
 
How about being left in a room for ten minutes with some fathers whose children have been molested. It would be cheap, effective and great therapy for the men involved.


Well, some fathers might manage it, I suppose. I'd leave them with a loaded pistol as well, just in case.
 
Well, some fathers might manage it, I suppose. I'd leave them with a loaded pistol as well, just in case.

Trust me when I tell you that any father whose child has been hurt can manage that. And a pistol is too quick.

My other option is to have him stripped naked, tied bent over a chair and be fucked in the ass repeatedly. Then beaten by the fathers.
 
I was on a jury panel for a molestation case. As soon as the judge found out I taught the age group the victim was in she immediately released me from the panel!
 
I was on a jury panel for a molestation case. As soon as the judge found out I taught the age group the victim was in she immediately released me from the panel!

You know, I would find it hard to find an "impartial" jury for something like that. The crime is one of the most heinous there is, and there are so many professions where one deals with children. Never mind trying to find someone with out children.

Even in that case, people have nieces and nephews. Most of these guys are done before the trial even starts and I am grateful for it. Rape cases inevitably have the victim on trial, but that is never really the case with children.
 
I'm curious why in the case of child pornography the overriding opinion is that owning it is just as bad as producing it, but in the case of drugs it's the suppliers that are the nasty evil-doers and the users are seen as innocent victims.

I'm sure someone will step in with some kind of arbitrary rationalisation at this point, but I still find it interesting.
 
I'm curious why in the case of child pornography the overriding opinion is that owning it is just as bad as producing it, but in the case of drugs it's the suppliers that are the nasty evil-doers and the users are seen as innocent victims.

I'm sure someone will step in with some kind of arbitrary rationalisation at this point, but I still find it interesting.

I think it shows that there is a demand for this kind of cr@p, so where there is a demand, some evil b@stard will endeavour to fill it.

The snag is that some "artistic" pictures can be regarded as child porn; a thing which has happened over here a time or two I understand. There exists a fine line between the two. . . .

PS. This gives a clue or two.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2A1NLoZ1vMc
[ the "guillotine footage" is from various films; it includes the "execution" of Anne Bolyne.
SingSing, 1928:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBa8jnzX-m4&feature=related
 
Last edited:
I'm curious why in the case of child pornography the overriding opinion is that owning it is just as bad as producing it, but in the case of drugs it's the suppliers that are the nasty evil-doers and the users are seen as innocent victims.

I'm sure someone will step in with some kind of arbitrary rationalisation at this point, but I still find it interesting.

Because generally many pedophiles start with "just looking". eventually the pictures become more and more of an obsession and will lead to trying it.

If one has that much porn they will commit the act. It is a disease. It is the equivalent of a recovering alcoholic surrounding himself with open containers of alcohol, he will succumb.

As for dealers? They are taking advantage of another person's weakness. However, I do not take the blame away from the victim entirely. WE all have freedom of choice.

Having grown up in a family riddled with addiction, I have a little more pity than some for the addicts. I have seen what they go through, and it is not pretty. People have the TV Hollywood versions in their mind, unless you have someone close to you who suffers you really have no clue.
 
The crime is one of the most heinous there is...

Good riddance to the piece of shit. The death penalty is too easy, I hope the convicts have fun with him, and I hope that was the judge's motivation for the ruling. People like that guy give the rest of us normal perverts a bad name.

/end discussion
 
Having grown up in a family riddled with addiction, I have a little more pity than some for the addicts. I have seen what they go through, and it is not pretty. People have the TV Hollywood versions in their mind, unless you have someone close to you who suffers you really have no clue.

To a lot of us, it's an "easy to switch off" thing, as opposed to a "living with the problem" thing.
Tres Sad.
 
Back
Top