Lucky Days

Guy_Nise

Experienced
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Posts
90
Lucky Days: A voyeur's perspective.

I am standing in narrow hall just outside a large closet disguised as an interview room. I arrived exactly on the hour to meet with the recruiter. If this was a business interview I would already be late, but this is for the public sector. I peek my head around the corner and see a pair of crossed legs in sheer black nylons. I look past her knee to an empty chair. I am still choking on a piece of bagel that I inhaled while rushing to the appointment. I swallow hard, and breath freely.

I enter the room and we exchange pleasantries and I sit in a chair opposite hers. There is supposed to be a third member joining our party. I can’t imagine where when I notice out of the corner of my eye a third chair buried under the small round table we are sitting at. She is professional and makes good eye contact. She has big eyes and a Midwest tan. She is wearing a modest black and white pattern dress that ends somewhere above the knee. Her dress is currently riding up her thigh which is pleasantly displayed. She uncrosses her legs; her nylons protect her modesty. She crosses her legs again and her dress rides up to the bottom of her ass.

I look directly into her eyes which are focused on me even as she fidgets with her dress. I am waiting for her to drop her gaze. I offer her my resume. She takes the bait. Her eyes drop to scan the document and my eyes scan her body. She stumbles through my resume; she is nervous. She has a pretty face, small tits with a curvy frame. Her crossed legs reveal nothing; my eyes cover the smooth curve of her thigh and bottom.

We talk. We each take turns asking questions. In my mind I imagine closing the door that is still ajar. I imagine sitting her up on the table. My hands brush over her calves and thighs. I imagine spreading her legs open and watching that proper dress retreat. I imagine the moistness I would feel as I rub her mound with the pads of my fingers.

She uncrosses her legs. My eyes dart down, peering into the darkness of her black nylons to snap a quick mental photograph before my eyes come back up to meet her’s. She caught me. She probably caught me before. Is that why she stumbled through my resume? I ask a few more questions to indicate that I am interested in the position and to extend this little encounter. This must be my lucky day.

That night I send her an email, “It was a pleasure meeting you. I enjoyed our conversation.” I wonder if she will pick up on the subtle point that I found pleasure in physically meeting her. I know it. That is all that matters.

The next morning (while I write this.) she responded back, “I really enjoyed our conversation. Thanks for coming.”
 
Last edited:
Spring is just around the corner.

The other day I was sitting in class and a young coed on the front row caught my attention. She had a deep v-neck tee-shirt which exposed the deep cleavage of her large breasts. A few seconds later she put on her cardigan. Now, I make it a point to look for her in class to see what she has on. She is usually wearing a sweater.

I look forward to late spring, when all the girls shed their coats and "take the twins for a walk (Robin Williams*)." Especially, Ms. Cardigan.






*Robin Williams, Live on Broadway, "But the most beautiful thing about a day like today in NY is that the ladies take the twins for a walk! Oh, yeah, the titties are out today!"
 
Men don't listen to sexy women, but women do!

Sexual Cues Emanating From the Anchorette Chair: Implications for Perceived Professionalism, Fitness for Beat, and Memory for News

Abstract

The experimental study reported here employed one of the most compelling visual cues of female sexual attractiveness (low waist-to-hip ratio) to test the influence of news anchor sexualization on audience evaluations of her as a professional and their memory for the news that she presents. Male participants saw the sexualized version of the anchor as less suited for war and political reporting. They also encoded less news information presented by the sexualized than her unsexualized version. Conclusions were drawn in line with evolutionary psychology expectations of men’s cognitive susceptibility to visual sex cues. Women participants, on the other hand, did not vary across conditions in their assessments of the anchor’s competence to report on war and political news. Moreover, they encoded more news information presented by the sexualized than unsexualized anchor condition.
 
I have been keeping an eye on Ms. Cardigan these last few weeks. I've wondered if she wears a padded bra? I was walking in the hall yesterday and realized she was in front of me. She really works it when she walks. She has been blessed. She had on a light white tee with a sports bra underneath.
 
Parched

I sip at the bright sunny day; its warmth fills me and I realize how parched I am. The first day of spring arrived early this year. I wish I hadn’t brought my coat and wonder if Ms. Cardigan feels the same way.
As it turns out Ms. Cardigan has turned in her soft wool sweater for an army green button up shirt and a brown tank-top. She has a casual army theme that reminds me of Old Navy. Her breasts push out against the faded cotton and her cleavage barely peeks out over the collar of her shirt before deciding to stay inside today. So, I turned my attention else ware.
Every other class I can expect my neighbor to look inside her bag, presenting her breasts in the process. There is a difference between presented breasts and the classic down-blouse experience. Presentation creates cleavage by lifting and pressing the breasts in towards each other. This is a classic in lingerie; Victoria’s Secret is the industry leader in breast presentation with the WonderBra. Every other class period Victoria’s secret is out. She leans forward her breasts meet and rise up and create a dark cleavage line.
Today, Victoria’s secret reveals a classic down-blouse experience. We both arrive before class. She turns in her chair, her shoulders square with my line of sight. She leans forward, looking into her bag. The collar of her tee-shirt hangs low, opening my line of sight. There is a pronounced gap between her breasts. I like to see deep cleavage. In the gap I can see the under-wire of her bra; there is a dark shadow along the inside edge of her cups. Her breasts fill both cups with a nice round curve that fills in the gap slightly. And then it is over.
 
120 reads and no responses when I browsed the page...this is a Gay and Lesbian site, by proxy, heterosexual descriptions are found repugnant here.

Secondly, 'stroke only' fiction is welcomed here, any indication of subtlty or nuance is simply ignored, they don't know what it is.

Post your stories and hope for the best...you won't find it here.

Amicus
 
120 reads and no responses when I browsed the page...this is a Gay and Lesbian site, by proxy, heterosexual descriptions are found repugnant here.

Secondly, 'stroke only' fiction is welcomed here, any indication of subtlty or nuance is simply ignored, they don't know what it is.

Post your stories and hope for the best...you won't find it here.

Amicus

Not so sure on the Gay/lesbian only part, but as for "stroke fiction" over substance yeah you pretty much nailed it there.
 
feedback

Amicus,

Thanks for your feedback. I agree with lovecraft, there is a significant heterosexual presence on the site.

I am hoping to create a scratch page of ideas that i can eventually develop into a story to submit to literotica proper. Part of that process is allowing those ideas to be exposed (appropriate for a voyeur, huh).

I am writing for myself in the voyeur/exhibitionist niche. Is there a forum you think would be better suited? Obviously, my writing would be interesting to those with similar tastes.

Also, would you please elaborate on your comment, ". . . 'stroke only' fiction is welcomed here, any indication of subtlty or nuance is simply ignored, they don't know what it is." Would you identify my "indication(s) of subtlty or nuance". I am still pretty new here and appreciate the feedback.

You do raise an interesting assumption that there is a difference between the experience a man and woman have when looking at a girl they are attracted to. That is plausible, some could argue looking is looking. I believe each would have a different experience.

Thanks again.

Guy


120 reads and no responses when I browsed the page...this is a Gay and Lesbian site, by proxy, heterosexual descriptions are found repugnant here.

Secondly, 'stroke only' fiction is welcomed here, any indication of subtlty or nuance is simply ignored, they don't know what it is.

Post your stories and hope for the best...you won't find it here.

Amicus
 
Last edited:
I recall the days, so long ago, when see thru blouses were in fashion. Now those were the days for titty ogling!:D
 
How does amicus know what erotica is on this site (which is a predominantly hetero site--just look at the categories)? He doesn't come here for the erotica.

The small number of hits on this thread are because this is a discussion board, not the story file. This was a sex scene just dropped on a discussion forum without any question/comment.

Nice break from the routine of amicus's irrelvant posts, though.
 
I recall the days, so long ago, when see thru blouses were in fashion. Now those were the days for titty ogling!:D
I remember coming out of church with my whole family one Sunday afternoon. As we walked down Broadway how could we not notice the woman walking in front of us had on a sheer blouse, and a sheer ruffled skirt. We could clearly see she wasn't wearing a bra or panties.

Thanks for the memories.
 
Back
Top