Lowering standards

[Forrest Elf]

To lower the standards one should first have a standard of some sort.


If that's the case over here I'll do my best to lower it

ps rhino, don't wear a kilt when in the chalk-lands or you'll be able to write your own name on a blackbord with your you know what

 

[DirtyJJ]

Hi Forrest -
I thought I would reply to your first post by saying Hello and Welcome.


As far as standards here - what's that? Never heard of them.

 

[MathGirl]

Nicely done

To lower the standards one should first have a standard of some sort.

Dear FE,
I admire the fact that you introduced yourself to this site by pointing out a deficiency therein. Not many have the nerve to do that.
MG

 

[Jenny _S]

Re: Nicely done

Dear FE,
I admire the fact that you introduced yourself to this site by pointing out a deficiency therein. Not many have the nerve to do that.
MG

True, MG,
Most newbies know better.

Welcome elf

 

[Guest]

 

[Icingsugar]

Time to join the chorus: Mr Elf, I bid you and whatever standards you may or may not have, a warm welcome.

 

[gauchecritic]

I don't understand the question.

Eyup forest.

Gauche

 

[oggbashan]

My standard is only lowered when I'm dead.

But I've been dead a few thousand years so perhaps I should raise my standard again. I suppose I'll have to use ISO 9000.

Og

 

[Guest]

A virgin forest elf - unique in these parts; cum attitude, even better.

Welcome from Perdita

 

[ffreak]

Welcome a-board Forest Elf.

Now we can get each other's re-plys confused, FE.

-FF (already good at confusing replies)

ps. ISO 9000 - in search of 9000 contradictory standards.

 

[Rumple Foreskin]

To lower the standards one should first have a standard of some sort.


If that's the case over here I'll do my best to lower it

Oh.

Rumple Foreskin

 

[MathGirl]

Re: Re: Lowering standards

Oh.

Dear Rumple,
I'm impressed. In contrast to some others on here, you manage to convey absolutely zero using only one word.
MG

 

[Guest]

Re: Re: Re: Lowering standards

Dear Rumple, I'm impressed. In contrast to some others on here, you manage to convey absolutely zero using only one word.

Yeah, but he could have left off the 'h'.

P.

 

[Icingsugar]

Re: Re: Re: Lowering standards

Dear Rumple,
I'm impressed. In contrast to some others on here, you manage to convey absolutely zero using only one word.
MG

Yes. We are all in utter awe.

 

[oggbashan]

Re: Re: Re: Lowering standards

Dear Rumple,
I'm impressed. In contrast to some others on here, you manage to convey absolutely zero using only one word.
MG

But MathGirl often makes her point just with a

.


Og

 

[Rumple Foreskin]

Re: Re: Re: Lowering standards

Dear Rumple,
I'm impressed. In contrast to some others on here, you manage to convey absolutely zero using only one word.
MG

MathGirl, et al,

I strive to give satisfaction.

Rumple Foreskin

 

[champagne1982]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Lowering standards

[...]I strive to give satisfaction.

Rumple Foreskin

Perhaps this should be the new standard?

 

[raphy]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lowering standards

Perhaps this should be the new standard?

Can't see anyone adhereing to it, to be honest.

 

[Guest]

Personal Standard

I strive to give satisfaction.

"Standard" !?! That's the minimum I require from any man.

perplexed, Perdita

 

[ffreak]

And here I thought that women wanted respect.

Do you know how hard it is for man to keep two concepts in his mind at one time? Especially if he has his hands and mouth busy? (the list of abilities diminishes with anything else involved)

-FF (with a little list to start)

ps. size and satisfaction are not related - length can also refer to time, like in how long it takes to savor the luscious response that a woman's body can produce.

pps. lowering one's standard can lead to new discoveries - what do we have here, let's see, oh, how pretty, nice to meet you.