Lord of the Flies vs. Survivor

HeavyStick

Anti-M 0derator
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Posts
47,301
would you chose politics over food on the table.

hmmm I can keep a girl around who does nothing and bitches all day cause tom hanks had spalding to talk to, or you can keep the girl who just wrestled down a pig and is making dinner.

I vote the pig killer... pig fat is an excellent lubricant and will come in handy later in the evening
 
um...heavy stick...you meant castaway, not lord of the flies when you were talking about tom hanks


Lord of the flies has a bunch of schoolaged boys who end up on an island and regress back to savages. Just thought you might want to know.
 
deliciously_naughty said:
um...heavy stick...you meant castaway, not lord of the flies when you were talking about tom hanks


Lord of the flies has a bunch of schoolaged boys who end up on an island and regress back to savages. Just thought you might want to know.

ok..... I tried to keep it simple.

(no offense towards you)

people on survivor bitch about everything and anything. I was portraying how some people make a difference and some make it worse with complacency.

Lord of the Flies was Survivor in a rather barbaric sense of dominance.
 
HeavyStick said:


ok..... I tried to keep it simple.

(no offense towards you)

people on survivor bitch about everything and anything. I was portraying how some people make a difference and some make it worse with complacency.

Lord of the Flies was Survivor in a rather barbaric sense of dominance.

yeah...but then what the fuck does tom hanks have to do with anything...read your original post.
 
HeavyStick said:


ok..... I tried to keep it simple.

(no offense towards you)

people on survivor bitch about everything and anything. I was portraying how some people make a difference and some make it worse with complacency.

Lord of the Flies was Survivor in a rather barbaric sense of dominance.

This does have me wondering what it would do for ratings if the Survivor losers were to be killed with crude spears and eaten by the others each week...
 
deliciously_naughty said:


yeah...but then what the fuck does tom hanks have to do with anything...read your original post.

sorry sweety it was sarcasm
 
takingchances42 said:
This does have me wondering what it would do for ratings if the Survivor losers were to be killed with crude spears and eaten by the others each week...
Yeah, no kidding. "Survivor" my ass. None of them are in any real danger. Now, if they had no food and had to vote on who they'd eat for sustenance every week . . . that would be entertaining. They can start with Jeff Probst, for all I care.

TB4p
 
Back
Top