Looks like someone has been eating pussy

You and your pathetic obsession with Heathyr Hoffman is definitely growing on me, Mike. Like a fungus.
 
I don't know why I thought this thread would be anything other than what it is.
 
So, I'm curious. Let's call this a n00b question.

Is there any overlap on this board between the people who think Mike Yates is "probably harmless" and also think we should all be having a collective coming-to-Jesus moment about whether Recidiva might have had sexual contact with a sixteen-year-old a couple of decades ago? Because I'll be honest, "Mike" (who can only be the individual previously infamous as "RandyBirch" on dA) seems to me like a very clearly psychotic and active stalker that I'm kind of amazed is allowed to even post here.
 
Last edited:
So, I'm curious. Let's call this a n00b question.

Is there any overlap on this board between the people who think Mike Yates is "probably harmless" and also think we should all be having a collective coming-to-Jesus moment about whether Recidiva might have had sexual contact with a sixteen-year-old a couple of decades ago? Because I'll be honest, "Mike" (who can only be the individual previously infamous as "RandyBirch" on dA) seems to me like a very clearly psychotic and active stalker that I'm kind of amazed is allowed to even post here.

I used to think he was just jerkin rec, but now I really think he would tie her up in his basement given the chance. It's really sad. I really don't understand how someone can be like this. He really need to tighten up.
 
Having seen him elsewhere before coming here... yeah, he's a quite serious psycho and I don't think he's harmless in the least. (At minimum I sure as hell wouldn't be willing to wager on it.) This is part of what makes him the exception to my otherwise blanket personal ban on getting involved in GB drama.
 
Last edited:

Have you ever been close enough to a vagina so that you would be able to recognize the scent of a woman?
 
So, I'm curious. Let's call this a n00b question.

Is there any overlap on this board between the people who think Mike Yates is "probably harmless" and also think we should all be having a collective coming-to-Jesus moment about whether Recidiva might have had sexual contact with a sixteen-year-old a couple of decades ago? Because I'll be honest, "Mike" (who can only be the individual previously infamous as "RandyBirch" on dA) seems to me like a very clearly psychotic and active stalker that I'm kind of amazed is allowed to even post here.


I don't know if there's overlap..

As for Recidiva, I'm annoyed with anyone who posts underage crap here, making trouble for Laurel and jeopardizing the site to which I'm attached, as well as the income stream which saves kittens.

As for Mike, I figure he has done no harm so far, and I'd very much like to keep it that way. I don't think antagonizing, isolating, or ridiculing him really helps matters. When he starts threads I try to engage him constructively and ask him questions and make suggestions. I think those of us with more age and experience should try to help him see things more clearly, and help him with socialization challenges.

I figure as long as he's here conversing, he's socializing, and potentially better off than he might be isolated and introverted and acting out.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.
 
I don't know if there's overlap..

As for Recidiva, I'm annoyed with anyone who posts underage crap here, making trouble for Laurel and jeopardizing the site to which I'm attached, as well as the income stream which saves kittens.

As for Mike, I figure he has done no harm so far, and I'd very much like to keep it that way. I don't think antagonizing, isolating, or ridiculing him really helps matters. When he starts threads I try to engage him constructively and ask him questions and make suggestions. I think those of us with more age and experience should try to help him see things more clearly, and help him with socialization challenges.

I figure as long as he's here conversing, he's socializing, and potentially better off than he might be isolated and introverted and acting out.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.
He's a grown ass man. Nobody should have to hold his hand and baby him. He is socially challenge for a reason.
 
I recognize her, she's former special ops. If she shows up at your place, run for your life.
 
So, I'm curious...

...about whether Recidiva might have had sexual contact with a sixteen-year-old a couple of decades ago?

In her own words
:

image.php

Recidiva the Sex Offender

Here's the thread where it all went down:

Crimes of Passion

Here's Recidiva the Sex Offender's post, #9, which Laurel deleted because she deemed it in violation of literotica.com rules because it contained sexuality involving a minor:

Recidiva the Sex Offender's post #9 deleted

Here is Recidiva the Sex Offender's deleted post #9 imaged for posterity; only the separate, last line of another's commentary hold any other words than Recidiva the Sex Offender's own:

Recidiva the Sex Offender's post #9 revived

Here is Recidiva the Sex Offender's post #20 where she tells the Board how old she was when she knowingly and intentionally conducted an online BDSM relationship with a 14-year-old:

"Mid to late 20s if I recall correctly."

Here is Recidiva the Sex Offender's post #25 in the Crimes of Passion thread:

"Well, he was one of the guys I was messing around with at the same time"

And finally, here is Recidiva the Sex Offender's # post summation of her intentional online BDSM relationship with a 14-year-old and then meeting up with him later and fooling around with him in the front seat of a car...

...note especially:

1. "I had a roleplay relationship with him" - one she earlier states was BDSM in nature

2. "...was it still outside of what is considered lawful? Yes."

3. "If my daughter or son had a relationship with a person that much older, would I freak out? Hell yes."

"Do I think I could have been charged with a crime? Yep."

A "Mid to late 20s" woman intentionally conducting an online BDSM "roleplay" relationship with a 14-year-old kid, and then the same late 20s to 30-year-old woman agreeing to meet up with that same minor when he was 16 to fool around with him in the front seat of a car...

image.php

Recidiva the Sex Offender:
She BDSM "roleplayed"
with a 14-year-old boy

Recidiva the Sex Offender Thread
 
He's a grown ass man. Nobody should have to hold his hand and baby him. He is socially challenge for a reason.

Yeah. He is socially challenged for a reason- he was born different. He went to special education classes at school.

He still has challenges the rest of us don't have, such as John Bohner looking in his bedroom window with a flashlight, loud disembodied hissing emanating from dark rooms within his home, and a prankster chimp in a diaper ringing his doorbell.
 
I don't know if there's overlap..

As for Recidiva, I'm annoyed with anyone who posts underage crap here, making trouble for Laurel and jeopardizing the site to which I'm attached, as well as the income stream which saves kittens.

As for Mike, I figure he has done no harm so far, and I'd very much like to keep it that way. I don't think antagonizing, isolating, or ridiculing him really helps matters. When he starts threads I try to engage him constructively and ask him questions and make suggestions. I think those of us with more age and experience should try to help him see things more clearly, and help him with socialization challenges.

I figure as long as he's here conversing, he's socializing, and potentially better off than he might be isolated and introverted and acting out.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

To be fair, Mike does very little socializing here. Very little.
 
So, I'm curious. Let's call this a n00b question.

Is there any overlap on this board between the people who think Mike Yates is "probably harmless" and also think we should all be having a collective coming-to-Jesus moment about whether Recidiva might have had sexual contact with a sixteen-year-old a couple of decades ago? Because I'll be honest, "Mike" (who can only be the individual previously infamous as "RandyBirch" on dA) seems to me like a very clearly psychotic and active stalker that I'm kind of amazed is allowed to even post here.

You sound to me like someone who is personally associated with Heathyr.

Does your name happen to be Shayne Bohner?

I came across three people who personally know Heathyr (and one who may actually have been Heathyr herself) on another forum called www.phun.org

http://thumbnails106.imagebam.com/40923/1f0dfb409222190.jpg http://thumbnails107.imagebam.com/40923/7038c1409222191.jpg
 
Last edited:
^ EDIT: Lulz. No, "Mike," I don't have to know Heathyr personally to spot a creep.

As for Mike, I figure he has done no harm so far, and I'd very much like to keep it that way.

Fair point. Maybe I'll just link this any time one of these threads manages to sneak past the ig filter.
 
Last edited:
^ EDIT: Lulz. No, "Mike," I don't have to know Heathyr personally to spot a creep.



Fair point. Maybe I'll just link this any time one of these threads manages to sneak past the ig filter.

How do you know and remember me from deviantart?
 
Back
Top