Looking at the US

mishkin

Really Experienced
Joined
Feb 2, 2002
Posts
259
I have to agree with Unregistered's main point, though not by any means with everything he says along the way.

Factual backfround: Israel has not withdrawn and continues to expand settlements. The fact that it continued to expand in contradiction to what it had agreed in the Oslo Peace Accords undermined any prospect for being trusted by the Palstinians during the Barak/Clinton Camp David negotiations.

The way I see it is that a sensible policy for Israel itself and for the US is different.

Israel has a dilemma. Do they expand as they are doing at the cost of making the Palestinians and the Islamic world even more hostile, or do they contract within the boundaries set by the UN resloutions at the cost of being less easily defended and less easily able to absorb more immigrants?
Their policy has been to continue to expand while trying, or claiming to try, to make peace with the Palestinians. The trouble is that this won't work because the first makes the second inherently unattainable.

The US and the rest of us, as I see it, have no such dilemma. Support for Israeli expansion is simply not worth incurring the intense hostility of the Islamic world - much bigger, and holding the oil. It has long been clear that the Isamic world would hit back at the US for its support for Israel as soon as it could, and though no state dare take on the US militarily, this simply means they finance undercover terrorists to do so. These will now have far more recruits in reaction to the US war on Afghanistan.

This would mean the US changing from a policy of claiming to be the honest broker but in fact always backing Israel, to a policy of using the US's financial and military supplies muscle to rein the Israeli's back, while offering them treaty guarentees to re-assure them against any weakening of their military position.

What I find entirely baffling is why this is not as obvious to the US govt. as it is to most informed outside observers, eg the EU, and for that matter many Jews.

Sorry to go on about it but then it really is important.

Back to sex and friendship!
 
This was meant to go as a reply in the thread Taking a look at ...the US., but I must have pressed the New Thread button.

I've re-posted it there.

Slaps wrist.
 
It is a stupid war over there for land lets tell them they got three weeks to get everyone out of the area a 100 mile diamiter and then nuke the land to nothing then they would have nothing t fight over.

thats what shold happen but it won't.
 
I did notice...

You're right in what you say.

Israel does have a dilema which is one of their own making.

To begin mending fences they could, as a start, revoke the laws that forbid the sale of land to Palestinians. Land that was taken from them in the first place by Jewish National Land Fund.

Another small but important point is to define National and Citizen correctly.

"Citizenship (ezrahut) may be held by Arabs as well as Jews while nationality (le'um), which bestows significantly greater rights than citizenship, may be claimed by Jews alone.

To refer to "Arab nationals," as this law does, is a deceptive translation of ezrahut, because Arabs or others who are not Jews cannot be "nationals" of Israel. Only Jews can be "nationals." "

source Washington Report on Middle East Affairs - January 1990.

:)
 
Back
Top