Livestock Disease Called Under Control

DarkAngel

Soul Stealer
Joined
Nov 9, 2000
Posts
8,012
The study, conducted by a team of scientists from the University of Edinburgh's Center
for Tropical Veterinary Medicine and published in the journal Nature, said the
government's battle against foot-and-mouth disease was being won.

It is the first independent confirmation that Britain had turned the corner in battling the
highly contagious disease.

But scientists from the Center for Tropical Veterinary Medicine also warned that
though the livestock disease had been contained, there was still need for continued
aggressive action to prevent a resurgence.

"Any intensification or relaxation of control efforts could greatly affect the final scale
and duration of the epidemic," the study said.

Spreading the Infection

The scientists based their study on the "case-reproduction ratio," a calculation that
measures how many new cases was being generated by each farm already afflicted
by the disease.

For an outbreak to be considered "under control," the "case-reproduction ratio" should
be less than one, a figure that was reached on March 30, according to the study.

At the start of the epidemic, the scientists found that each afflicted farm was
generating three new cases.

The containment was a result of the government's culling program as well as early
detection measures, the study found.

Silence of the Lambs

The news came more than a week after David King, the government's chief scientific
adviser, announced the epidemic was "fully under control."

Since foot-and-mouth was officially confirmed on Feb 20, animals on more than 1,500
farms were afflicted by the disease, sparking off a mass culling that fueled anger in
the British farming community, which has lost nearly four percent of its livestock.

Although foot-and-mouth is virtually harmless to humans, fears of exposure to the
virus has taken a toll on the British tourism industry over the past two months as
foreign and domestic tourists have stayed away from rural areas. The British tourism
industry is expected to have lost nearly $3.6 billion in cancellations.

The worst affected were British farmers, who had to stand by while thousands of their
healthy animals were slaughtered in order to meet international trade standards.

Under European Union regulations, culling animals is the only way to earn a "disease
free" status on world markets.
 
'30% of confirmed foot-and-mouth cases proved unfounded'

Nearly 30% of the confirmed cases of foot-and-mouth disease in Britain have proved negative in laboratory tests.

The Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (Maff) said around 450 of the 1,573 so far confirmed did not prove positive when blood tests were carried out at the world's leading foot-and-mouth laboratory, in Surrey.

In addition, of the 250 cases where animals were slaughtered on suspicion of having the disease, only 46 cases (18.4%) were later confirmed positive by laboratory tests.

That raised the possibility that hundreds of farms were wrongly diagnosed leading to the unnecessary slaughter of many thousands of animals on those farms.

A Maff spokesman said negative results did not necessarily mean foot-and-mouth was not present on the farms.

It could have been that the animals were not in the stage of the disease where the virus would show up in tests, he said.

Maff also said speed of slaughter had been crucial in the fight against foot-and-mouth and vets diagnosing animals in the field could not wait for laboratory results before moving to slaughter.

But the figures, revealed to Channel Four News by senior vets, will fuel anger among farmers who feel their healthy animals were slaughtered for no reason.

If the farms were misdiagnosed, the mistakes will also have cost the taxpayer millions of pounds in compensation.
Taken from http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_289006.html
-----------------------------------
The policy was to slaughter all stock on the farm within 24 hours, if a visual inspection showed symptoms of foot and mouth in any animal. Also the slaughter of all stock on neighbouring farms, (The contiguous cull). The blood tests take five days to process. It is no consolation to find out your stock was clear and healthy, when they and your neighbours stock are being burnt in the fields. Not much point in appealing then. The evidence has been disposed of..
Apalling mistakes have been made.
The whole veterinary profession has come out of this badly.
 
Back
Top