Lipstick on a Fucking PIG

impressive

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Posts
27,372
(Sorry -- just venting!)

http://edworkforce.house.gov/press/press108/second/12dec/idea120304.htm

President Bush Signs Special Education Reform Bill; House Republicans Hail Bipartisan Achievement

WASHINGTON , D.C. – President George W. Bush today signed into law a bipartisan bill revamping the nation’s special education law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), setting in motion important changes that will help teachers, parents, and schools ensure every student with a disability receives a quality education. The new law is the second major bipartisan overhaul of American education policy to be completed during President Bush’s first term in office, building on the No Child Left Behind Act signed by the President in January 2002.

The new law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (H.R. 1350), is based on legislation authored by House Education Reform Subcommittee Chairman Mike Castle (R-DE) that passed the House in 2003 with bipartisan support. The culmination of more than two years of work in Congress on IDEA reauthorization, it includes reforms recommended in 2002 by President Bush’s special education commission, as well as key elements of the IDEA reauthorization bill passed by the Senate in 2004.

“This new law is a bright light that demonstrates both parties can work together and achieve real change to improve the lives of Americans,” said Castle. “Today we are making sure children with disabilities are given access to an education that maximizes their unique abilities and provides them with the tools to be successful, productive members of our communities. But we cannot stop here; we must continue to work to improve education for all children, so we ensure each child has access to a quality education.”

“Democrats and Republicans were able to work together during President Bush’s first term to deliver not one, but two major revisions to federal education law,” said Rep. John Boehner (R-OH), who chaired the House-Senate negotiations that produced the final bill. “There’s a lot more left to do, particularly in terms of ensuring low-income parents have the same choices other parents have in choosing schools for their children. But this new law is a major bipartisan step forward that will make a positive difference for teachers, parents, and children with special needs.”

The new special education law will:

* Ensure school safety and reasonable discipline;
* Give local schools more flexibility and greater control;
* Move away from compliance with burdensome regulations and costly litigation, and reduce the paperwork burden on teachers; and
* Expand choices and give parents more control over their children’s education.

“[This] law's passage offers a refreshing example of adults pushing across party lines and back at interest group pressures, and working together to change the status quo and improve educational opportunities for our most vulnerable children,” wrote Sara Mead, a policy analyst with the Progressive Policy Institute’s 21st Century Schools Project, in the December 2, 2004 edition of the “Education Gadfly,” the weekly education reform bulletin published by the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. The bulletin can be found online at http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/gadfly/index.cfm.

A full summary of the new special education law and other related information can be found online at the House Education and the Workforce Committee majority website at http://edworkforce.house.gov/issues/108th/education/idea/idea.htm.

# # # # #
 
Pigs wear lipstick?

:confused:

I'm trying to picture their cute little hock thingys trying to hold it ...

:p
 
sorry, just read the article.... was just tryin' to make a funny.... running now......>>>>>>>>>> :(
 
Thanks for the bumps. I really wasn't expecting replies/discussion. I was just venting steam. :rose:
 
Since about 1 in 3 the kids in a class have learning disabilities, programs like this need to be scruitinized to see if they are meant to help those kids, or help school districts slide them through and out.

My own political bias color my expectation here. As does the fact I have an LD son who the public schools basicially said "He learns well with the accomodations we made for him under IDEA, which proves he doesn't need the accomodations so we are withdrawing the them."

That's like saying, "The kid with broken leg walks well on crutches, proofing he does need the crutches."

We withdrew him from public school instead.

Einstein, Leonard Da Vinci, Richard Branson and Edison are some examples of dyslexics (just one kind of LD).

So does this program help or harm one of every three kids you know (perhaps in your own home)?

Any professionals here who have looked at this program?
 
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The new special education law will:

* Ensure school safety and reasonable discipline;
* Give local schools more flexibility and greater control;
* Move away from compliance with burdensome regulations and costly litigation, and reduce the paperwork burden on teachers; and
* Expand choices and give parents more control over their children’s education.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

So ambiguous as to be almost blatently meaningless.
Typical politico speak........

For 'ensure safety...' etc'.....read: we can exclude any child we think will be difficult to cope with, and use the 'safety' get out clause.

For 'give local schools......etc.' read: we can exclude any child we think willbe difficult to cope with;

For 'move away from compliance...etc.'......read: we can exclude any child we think will be difficult to cope with, using the 'non-compliance' clause.

For 'expand choices...etc.', read: we can exclude any child we think willbe difficult to cope with, under the ' you don't like it choose to go somewhere else' clause.

........or is Mat being a tad too cynical here? Hmmmm???
 
Less paperwork...hah!!

As a school psychologist from preschool to grade 6, I can tell you that the first law, No Child Left Behind, just created an avalanche of paperwork. This one will probably create more problems than it solves. Integrating Special Education students into the general population is not necessarily the best thing for them. More likely than not, they will be in a different room most of the day, working with a special education teacher. If they're lucky, they will have science, social studies and gym/music/art with their own class. Many public school teachers are not trained properly on how to deal with the increased paperwork, and as a result do a superficial job with it. At the three schools I work in, morale is at an all time low, due to President Bush and his attempts to "help" Special Education students succeed in the general curriculum. This next law may just be the final nail in the coffin.....


Sack:(
 
matriarch said:
........or is Mat being a tad too cynical here? Hmmmm???

No, Mat is NOT being too cynical. "Administrative convenience" is the driving force behind most of the changes made to the law. There is virtually nothing that will "improve educational outcomes."

It makes it easier for schools to move challenging students (even just for, say, NCLB test time) and more difficult for parents to challenge schools.

*sigh*

Kids lost a lot of ground with this new law. :mad:
 
Back
Top