Liberals do not believe in Darwinism...

pornstarwannabe

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Posts
5,084
If they did, they would realize that they do not have to stop home/business construction in areas populated by a certain species of insect. They would realize that the insect will move to a different location.

That's just one example. For a group that loves to trounce the religious and embrace science, they sure don't embrace Darwin.

There are any more examples. Post 'em if you got 'em.
 
PSW is making less sense than normal this morning. That's quite an accomplishment for him.
 
Is raping logic a hobby of yours, PSW?
 
Is raping logic a hobby of yours, PSW?

No raping logic here. But I find it odd that Liberals that want to protect insects do not realize simple evidence that we humans have gathered over the years.
 
I think we all can agree that liberalism and socialism are caused by a genetic defect
 
No raping logic here. But I find it odd that Liberals that want to protect insects do not realize simple evidence that we humans have gathered over the years.
Ok, my apologies. You're not raping logic. You're raping premises.
 
Ok, my apologies. You're not raping logic. You're raping premises.

Apology accepted. I will wait for an additional apology for that last remark.

Interesting how no one is defending the liberals that are anti-Darwin.
 
If they did, they would realize that they do not have to stop home/business construction in areas populated by a certain species of insect. They would realize that the insect will move to a different location.

That is not darwinism/evolution

Just saying.
 
Liberals advocated criminal's rights and were against parents and school authorities disciplining their children years ago. Now they're advocating gun control to strip law abiding citizens of self-defense, thinking it will curtail the very criminals they helped create.
 
Nice try.

Wait, what am I saying?

Lame try.
 
You are right. American Liberals don't believe in Darwinism as the way conservative creationists depict it.

The problem is that the people who cannot grasp the concept of evolution (which has gone beyond Darwinism) don't realize that they have dropped on the evolutionary scale. Doesn't mean they won't continue to exist just as monkeys exist, it just means their brains are incapable of higher level thinking.
 
If they did, they would realize that they do not have to stop home/business construction in areas populated by a certain species of insect. They would realize that the insect will move to a different location.

That's just one example. For a group that loves to trounce the religious and embrace science, they sure don't embrace Darwin.

There are any more examples. Post 'em if you got 'em.

one...you dont know what you're talking about... if you disrupt an insects food supply in a region by developing it, they won't go anywhere..they'll die... that's what happens... they dont get a u-haul and move...so please, shut up


secondly, are you saying a group that opposes evolution being taught in a classroom actually embraces Darwin


three, you're an idiot
 
If they did, they would realize that they do not have to stop home/business construction in areas populated by a certain species of insect. They would realize that the insect will move to a different location.

That's just one example. For a group that loves to trounce the religious and embrace science, they sure don't embrace Darwin.

There are any more examples. Post 'em if you got 'em.

You really need to stop and think before making these threads.
 
one...you dont know what you're talking about... if you disrupt an insects food supply in a region by developing it, they won't go anywhere..they'll die... that's what happens... they dont get a u-haul and move...so please, shut up


secondly, are you saying a group that opposes evolution being taught in a classroom actually embraces Darwin


three, you're an idiot

First: See, there you go again. You "assumed" that the food supply was disrupted. Have facts to support that? Thought so.

Second: I am saying that a group that believes in natural selection does not want to see natural selection in progress. Google "Caribou Alaska Pipeline" for an example of what can happen when humans build in the area of other species.

Third: When all else fails, sling insults.

You really need to stop and think before making these threads.

Not at all. I could be like you and tell LITsters they are "confused" if they disagree with me. But instead, I prefer to take a different approach: shining a light on Liberal Lunacy.
 
First: See, there you go again. You "assumed" that the food supply was disrupted. Have facts to support that? Thought so.

Second: I am saying that a group that believes in natural selection does not want to see natural selection in progress. Google "Caribou Alaska Pipeline" for an example of what can happen when humans build in the area of other species.

Third: When all else fails, sling insults.


.

one.. you're saying destroying an insects habitat won't destroy their food supply?...on what exact planet does that happen... because I ensure it's not on Earth..do you have any facts to support your INITIAL claim? no...what a fucking shocker

secondly.. you didnt make that point at all in your post.. I could post it again... but I know moving goal posts is your favourite hobby


YOU claimed that liberals dont embrace Darwin.. thusly implying Conservatives do, despite this flying in the face of pretty much every conservative group that tries ignoring Darwin and evolution being taught


Third, when all else fails...like all your memes.. pout
 
Evolution doesn't work like this and even if it did it's not wise to fuck with it all willy nilly.
 
one.. you're saying destroying an insects habitat won't destroy their food supply?...on what exact planet does that happen... because I ensure it's not on Earth..

There you go assuming again. You are assuming that the insects in questions will have their entire habitat demolished and that the entire food supply will be demolished.

So, partial habitat demolition is not possible?
 
Back
Top