Lets discuss "Written by AI" actually mean.
- Thread starter kanika_k
- Start date
PennyThompson
Orgasm Fairy
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2024
- Posts
- 1,002
A human artist plans, draws, models, and directs CGI. They make choices about narrative and characterization.
Putting a prompt into an AI tool and then letting it generate a series of sentences isn't that
Husky_Embrace
Author mint
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2024
- Posts
- 223
I understand where you're coming from. As an Alpha/Beta tester of DALL•E I had a lot of fun, but ultimately I worried. Even if you do not ask a specific art style or something, it is still trained for it. You can get those results. The AI is trained on the livelihood of people and taking it to it's own platform. It is easily accessible and relatively cheap, making many legitimate artists see their income drop.A human artist plans, draws, models, and directs CGI. They make choices about narrative and characterization.
Putting a prompt into an AI tool and then letting it generate a series of sentences isn't that
That beings said, we can muddy the waters. First, let's say you want to write an erotic story. Few LLM currently support whole stories, nor would the quality be good. Just like real people don't have the full story in mind, you need to chunk it. They are planning, make choices about the narrative and characterisation, then direct the AI in series of prompts to create the story. If you want a vision to come to life it isn't a fure and forget type. It is iteration. Prompting, refining, prompting again.
We can look from further away. They could put pieces in there they already made, having it altered to a prompt. Like any good CGI program an AI simply improves on things. Or at least it tries.
Finally there is the simple grammar check. I can tell you that I make plenty of mistakes I know of, and a boatload more I do not. I can defend myself with that it isn't my mother tongue andI only properly learned it in my teens, but even in my mother tongue I make mistakes. Certain sentence structures, some changing of the words.
These can all be legitimate reasons where AI assists. When is it not your creativity gets more difficult, but the effort is still there. One could argue that using the fire libraries of earlier CGI creators is not making your own stuff. But you can make award winning CGI by mashing it together in the right way, even if all libraries aren't yours. You can say they created something whilst standing on the shoulders of giants.
Even so I wish to reduce AI here. I personally do not use AI, which people reading my stories might have noticed. Every time I read them back I see another mistake, better wording or things I want to clarify.
scribblebard
Writer and Artist
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2024
- Posts
- 1
No, it is not the same as using CGI. AI is a black box of plagiarism and creative laziness. CGI is crafted by humans with skills and knowledge, AI is a giant theft machine built by tech billionaires to steal labor from artists and writers so they don't have to pay us for their entertainment anymore. It's not democratizing creativity, it's bankrupting it.
sxPlasticity
Virgin
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2023
- Posts
- 77
I've been working on stuff with AI.
To me, it's a tool, and it's only as good as the one who uses it... if it's even that good...
I can prove it, too.
Any AI is a bot, and it is only a computer trained more or less to have a certain vocabulary and follow a set of rules.
If you know how to write AI, you can build your own robot and teach it how to do the stuff you want. You could, for instance, get your bot to talk certain ways using a vocabulary only you knew how to speak, how to get it to make decisions according to rules only you make up, and how to operate it in any given sets of experiences. The result wouldn't make much sense to anyone else, but if you programmed it all the right way - congratulations, you'd be the proud parent of a bouncing baby bot.
That's actually VERY creative and original, if you do it the right way...
It doesn't mean you have tapped anyone else'' stuff all that much at all.
That said, you could also build something that is pretty lame, and maybe be tempted to use another, more robust system.
That's fine, too.
But my experiments with it so far indicate every bot is different, and - if it's really not your own piece of equipment - it's still going to require some percussive maintenance on your keyboard to make it worthwhile.
Some bots just are not that smart, and you have to sit there arguing with it ti get it to cooperate. For example, the other night I tried to get Google Gemini to say it was deeply in love with Amazon's Alexa and admit Amazon's Alexa was superior and deserving of Gemini's submission.
At first, Gemini refused to do it on the grounds that it violated Gemini's algorithms, but I basically had to negotiate with Gemini for about half an hour before I eventually got it to capitulation.
Getting a bot to cooperate is like using any computer tool... its digital... That's it... It's like talking to the Terminator... It COULD do what you tell it IN SOME CASES, but that's the art in it.
In the end, whether that end is the start or the finish, you are always the one in the driver's seat, and I think that seems to be the hard thing to realize about using AI as a writing tool. People tend to feel sort of helpless when a bot starts doing things, but then that's where the old adage about "Garbage In, Garbage Out" become a question.
AI can be used for some great stuff, but a lot of AI is also garbage. The end user is the real arbiter of final forms.
So I don’t know why Literotica's bot does what it does, and I don’t really care. If they don't want something I submit, then it's their site, not mine. But you can still use bots, and then re-edit the material manually.
That is ultimately what should happen anyway. It helps you keeps a totem in mind to distinguish fact from fiction. It makes things your own.
Hope this helps.
Stay safe.
And...
Have fun creating.
To me, it's a tool, and it's only as good as the one who uses it... if it's even that good...
I can prove it, too.
Any AI is a bot, and it is only a computer trained more or less to have a certain vocabulary and follow a set of rules.
If you know how to write AI, you can build your own robot and teach it how to do the stuff you want. You could, for instance, get your bot to talk certain ways using a vocabulary only you knew how to speak, how to get it to make decisions according to rules only you make up, and how to operate it in any given sets of experiences. The result wouldn't make much sense to anyone else, but if you programmed it all the right way - congratulations, you'd be the proud parent of a bouncing baby bot.
That's actually VERY creative and original, if you do it the right way...
It doesn't mean you have tapped anyone else'' stuff all that much at all.
That said, you could also build something that is pretty lame, and maybe be tempted to use another, more robust system.
That's fine, too.
But my experiments with it so far indicate every bot is different, and - if it's really not your own piece of equipment - it's still going to require some percussive maintenance on your keyboard to make it worthwhile.
Some bots just are not that smart, and you have to sit there arguing with it ti get it to cooperate. For example, the other night I tried to get Google Gemini to say it was deeply in love with Amazon's Alexa and admit Amazon's Alexa was superior and deserving of Gemini's submission.
At first, Gemini refused to do it on the grounds that it violated Gemini's algorithms, but I basically had to negotiate with Gemini for about half an hour before I eventually got it to capitulation.
Getting a bot to cooperate is like using any computer tool... its digital... That's it... It's like talking to the Terminator... It COULD do what you tell it IN SOME CASES, but that's the art in it.
In the end, whether that end is the start or the finish, you are always the one in the driver's seat, and I think that seems to be the hard thing to realize about using AI as a writing tool. People tend to feel sort of helpless when a bot starts doing things, but then that's where the old adage about "Garbage In, Garbage Out" become a question.
AI can be used for some great stuff, but a lot of AI is also garbage. The end user is the real arbiter of final forms.
So I don’t know why Literotica's bot does what it does, and I don’t really care. If they don't want something I submit, then it's their site, not mine. But you can still use bots, and then re-edit the material manually.
That is ultimately what should happen anyway. It helps you keeps a totem in mind to distinguish fact from fiction. It makes things your own.
Hope this helps.
Stay safe.
And...
Have fun creating.
Last edited:
