Left wing pussy UKIP Britain!! £10K for tit comment!!

£10K isnt sarcasm.

sleeping with the boss to secure promotion does women with diginity and morals no favours at all. it simply promotes the sterotype.

sleeping with the boss to secure promotion is the same thing as prostitution.

feel free to discuss / have in put.
 
£10K isnt sarcasm.

sleeping with the boss to secure promotion does women with diginity and morals no favours at all. it simply promotes the sterotype.

sleeping with the boss to secure promotion is the same thing as prostitution.

feel free to discuss / have in put.

You're going to have to point me to the part where she slept with her boss.

However beyond that, what I find offensive is your one sided approach. It is apparently mighty fine and a-okay for the man to sleep with his employees and to make lewd and inappropriate remarks. And further that it does not reflect upon his professionalism. And that in fact he should not be at all penalized for his unprofessionalism. That if such things happen, well the woman should not have slept with him. Obviously it is all her fault.

Really?

The boss sleeping with employees in exchange for a promotion does men with diginity and morals no favours at all. it simply promotes the stereotype.

The boss offering a promotion in exchange for sex with an employee is the same thing as being a john participating in prostitution.

See how that works?

But it's easier to put it all on one side isn't it. :rolleyes:
 
RIP bawdy brit humour.
It was like the one thing y'all were really good at doing. :(
 
RIP bawdy brit humour.
It was like the one thing y'all were really good at doing. :(

ffs

did you read the article? this was just one more straw in a mountain of sustained unprofessional, unwanted, and entirely inappropriate behaviour of a supervisor towards a member of staff, and when he also included his allusions to include her teenaged daughter it became more than she was prepared to allow to pass unreported.

no co-worker, male or female, has the right to routinely allude sexually to another worker's body in ways that make them feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, and affects their working environment.
 
You're going to have to point me to the part where she slept with her boss.

However beyond that, what I find offensive is your one sided approach. It is apparently mighty fine and a-okay for the man to sleep with his employees and to make lewd and inappropriate remarksNo it isnt, and could you point out where i said it was?. And further that it does not reflect upon his professionalism yes it does, and not in any kind of good way. And that in fact he should not be at all penalized for his unprofessionalism anyone doing this should be sacked. but that goes both ways.. That if such things happen, well the woman should not have slept with him. Obviously it is all her fault of course not,
women are all innocent and some of them wouldnt dream of getting fucked bandy by a boss who would promote them and give them a pay rise. any who do that are doing it for the good of all women at work and not for self centred greed,
also they dont see it as setting the bar very low.
.

Really?

The boss sleeping with employees in exchange for a promotion does men with diginity and morals no favours at all. it simply promotes the stereotype.

The boss offering a promotion in exchange for sex with an employee is the same thing as being a john participating in prostitution.

See how that works?

But it's easier to put it all on one side isn't it. :rolleyes:
yes you do seem to be saying that women who betray womankind should be idolised and held up as good examples of how modern woman should conduct herself at work.
 
yes you do seem to be saying that women who betray womankind should be idolised and held up as good examples of how modern woman should conduct herself at work.

The problem isn't with what you said, it is what you didn't say. Your post only mentioned women but completely left out of the equation the man's role in this. If you are going to tar and feather one don't you think you should tar and feather both?

That is my point. By neglecting to cast aspersions on the boss, but instead only castigating the women, you gave a pass to the bad behavior of the employer.

Now when I mentioned only the man you took it as me giving the woman a pass. Get my point?

By your post one could assume what is good for the gander is not good for the goose.
 
And you're either taking the piss on this or being a butthead.

Or both. :p

Frankly I can't imagine you not advocating for this asshat to be fired.
 
The problem isn't with what you said, it is what you didn't say. Your post only mentioned women but completely left out of the equation the man's role in this. If you are going to tar and feather one don't you think you should tar and feather both?

That is my point. By neglecting to cast aspersions on the boss, but instead only castigating the women, you gave a pass to the bad behavior of the employer.

Now when I mentioned only the man you took it as me giving the woman a pass. Get my point?

By your post one could assume what is good for the gander is not good for the goose.

And you're either taking the piss on this or being a butthead.

Or both. :p

Frankly I can't imagine you not advocating for this asshat to be fired.

I'd more than fire him, I would also, as you suggest tar and feather the bastard (and any others contemplating similar things)
 
Back
Top