Leave to Washington State

Jenny_Jackson

Psycho Bitch
Joined
Jul 8, 2006
Posts
10,872
Every Bozo on the west coast has now moved to Seattle, I'm sure :rolleyes:

Children Required For Married Couples?

OLYMPIA, Wash. - An initiative filed by proponents of same-sex marriage would require heterosexual couples to have kids within three years or else have their marriage annulled.

Initiative 957 was filed last month by Washington Defense of Marriage Alliance. That group was formed last summer after the state supreme court upheld Washington's ban on same-sex marriage.

Under the measure, marriage would be limited to men and women who are able to have children. Couples would be required to prove they can have children in order to get a marriage license, and if they did not have children within three years, their marriage would be subject to annulment.

All other marriages would be defined as "unrecognized" and people in those marriages would be ineligible to receive any marriage benefits.

Supporters must gather more than 224,000 valid signatures by July 6 to put the initiative on the November ballot.

According to the group's Web site, organizers hope that the supreme court will strike down the initiatives as unconstitutional, weakening the basis for the same-sex marriage ban.

"And at the very least, it should be good fun to see the social conservatives who have long screamed that marriage exists for the sole purpose of procreation be forced to choke on their own rhetoric," it says.

2/5/2007
 
I should say I don't live in Seattle, but "ish" of Seattle.
 
Hey, I think it's far fucking out.

Points out just how fucking stupid bans on same sex marriages are.
 
Misty_Morning said:
Hey, I think it's far fucking out.

Points out just how fucking stupid bans on same sex marriages are.


Agreed.

:D
 
LOLOLOL

I mentioned this to my wife.

Her comment?

"Glad we don't live there."

We've been married for 14 years now and no kids by choice. Then again there's a medical reason.

Cat
 
SeaCat said:
We've been married for 14 years now and no kids by choice. Then again there's a medical reason.
Well, there's a medical reason that the same-sex folk can't have kids, too ;)
 
3113 said:
Well, there's a medical reason that the same-sex folk can't have kids, too ;)

Too true,

So how would this affect the mandate? The new law?

Cat
 
SeaCat said:
LOLOLOL

I mentioned this to my wife.

Her comment?

"Glad we don't live there."

We've been married for 14 years now and no kids by choice. Then again there's a medical reason.

Cat


You make a good point. I feel like I should clarify my earlier comment now. :eek: I'm not for the anullment of anyone's marriage, I'd just like the same rights. But I live in Michigan so that'll *never* happen, sad to say.
 
Glad someone is pointing out this screamingly obvious flaw in the "marriage is for procreation" argument.

By the same logic, menopause and erectile dysfunction (if unrelieved by all those handy drugs) should be grounds for annulment as well. And then shouldn't you have to prove that you're *not* married to purchase contraceptives?
 
Back
Top