Latest UK Health Data Shows Vaccinated Deaths Higher than Unvaccinated Deaths in Last

[BidudeinWi]

How could this be? Maybe the so called “vaccines,” when given more than ONE jab, are causing those who accept more than one, to be more susceptible to covid?

On a positive note, according to the data/graphs in the article, those who have been “vaccinated” ONLY once, do better than those with multiple “vaccines” and better than the un-“vaccinated!” So there’s that!


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...higher-unvaccinated-deaths-last-three-months/

 

[oggbashan]

From that source? No. I prefer to believe UK government figures.

 

[ll74]

How many times can you misinterpret data so egregiously and still keep a straight face as a "journalistic" entity?

 

[ll74]

From the source data that is being used in analysis:

The rate of death within 28 days or within 60 days of a positive COVID-19 test increases with age, and again is substantially greater in unvaccinated individuals compared to fully vaccinated individuals.

This data should be considered in the context of the vaccination status of the population groups shown in the rest of this report. In the context of very high vaccine coverage in the population, even with a highly effective vaccine, it is expected that a large proportion of cases, hospitalisations and deaths would occur in vaccinated individuals, simply because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated and no vaccine is 100% effective.
This is especially true because vaccination has been prioritised in individuals who are more susceptible or more at risk of severe disease. Individuals in risk groups may also be more at risk of hospitalisation or death due to non-COVID-19 causes, and thus may be hospitalised or die with COVID-19 rather than from COVID-19.

The vaccination status of cases, inpatients and deaths should not be used to assess vaccine effectiveness because of differences in risk, behaviour and testing in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. The case rates in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are crude rates that do not take into account underlying statistical biases in the data.

 

[ll74]

The accompanying blog for the report - https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2021/11/02/transparency-and-data-ukhsas-vaccines-report/

 

[BidudeinWi]

From that source? No. I prefer to believe UK government figures.

The source IS linked in n the article.

 

[BidudeinWi]

From the source data that is being used in analysis:

That’s a nice CYA “recommendation” but the data is the data. It’s clear from the data that single vaxed folks do better than the unvaccinated but 2-3 vaxed folks have much worse results. Take from that what you want.

 

[oggbashan]

The source IS linked in n the article.

And has very long explanations that debunk your headline. You still can't read your own links BoBo.

 

[ll74]

That’s a nice CYA “recommendation” but the data is the data. It’s clear from the data that single vaxed folks do better than the unvaccinated but 2-3 vaxed folks have much worse results. Take from that what you want.

Interesting....so you're saying that the people who collected the data are wrong about their own data.

But the analysis based on that source is correct.

Genius.

 

[BidudeinWi]

Interesting....so you're saying that the people who collected the data are wrong about their own data.

But the analysis based on that source is correct.

Genius.

Nope. The data is real. The blog is CYA!

 

[HisArpy]

Nope. The data is real. The blog is CYA!

Some people (certain names omitted) will believe what they're told, no matter how outlandish or incredulous, over what's true and fully supported by the underlying data.

For instance, the FBI says that the Texas Synagogue terrorist wasn't a terrorist and his actions weren't against the Jewish community. This was said and believed by (certain names omitted) despite evidence that he took Jewish hostages and demanded that his sister, a known terrorist and rabid anti-semite, be released from prison "or else the Jews are going to get it."


In the end, you cannot argue with closed minds. Instead you can only point them out and leave them behind when you and the rest of the world move on.

 

[WillJ8787]

From that source? No. I prefer to believe UK government figures.

Yes and a prime example of disinformation that should have a legal consequence since it promotes not getting vaccinated and that is a source of death for many folks who don't get vaccinated.

 

[WillJ8787]

Some people (certain names omitted) will believe what they're told, no matter how outlandish or incredulous, over what's true and fully supported by the underlying data.

For instance, the FBI says that the Texas Synagogue terrorist wasn't a terrorist and his actions weren't against the Jewish community. This was said and believed by (certain names omitted) despite evidence that he took Jewish hostages and demanded that his sister, a known terrorist and rabid anti-semite, be released from prison "or else the Jews are going to get it."


In the end, you cannot argue with closed minds. Instead you can only point them out and leave them behind when you and the rest of the world move on.

Where is your source for what the FBI said?

All of us know this maniac was a terrorist....it's being reported.as such in just about all sources. What am I missing?

It's also a conflation...the events and people you are referring to are different in each case.

 

[Rightguide]

Where is your source for what the FBI said?

All of us know this maniac was a terrorist....it's being reported.as such in just about all sources. What am I missing?

It's also a conflation...the events and people you are referring to are different in each case.

Google is your friend:

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/nat...-apparently-taken-at-texas-synagogue/3497811/

 

[Rightguide]

From that source? No. I prefer to believe UK government figures.

Looks like you might have been responsible for thousands of British deaths with your sermons on getting vaxxed.

 

[oggbashan]

Looks like you might have been responsible for thousands of British deaths with your sermons on getting vaxxed.

Wrong. The data doesn't show that. 91% of Brits are double vaxxed. 63% have had the booster. The number who have died possibly from vaccine complications is less than 0.001% of all those vaccinated.

The British have not been forced into vaccination. The majority have gladly been vaccinated because unlike you, they know it is sensible and statistically, they will be better off vaccinated than not.

Why only 63% have had the booster? Two main reasons.

1. The 12 -18-year-olds haven't had long enough from the first and second jabs to get the booster yet, and

2. Anyone who has tested positive for Covid has to wait a month before being vaccinated again and 23 million brits have been tested positive.

 

[ll74]

Some people (certain names omitted) will believe what they're told, no matter how outlandish or incredulous, over what's true and fully supported by the underlying data.

For instance, the FBI says that the Texas Synagogue terrorist wasn't a terrorist and his actions weren't against the Jewish community. This was said and believed by (certain names omitted) despite evidence that he took Jewish hostages and demanded that his sister, a known terrorist and rabid anti-semite, be released from prison "or else the Jews are going to get it."


In the end, you cannot argue with closed minds. Instead you can only point them out and leave them behind when you and the rest of the world move on.

The data they're referring to refutes what GP is asserting about it.

And the OP.ignores that....the definition of believing what you're told

 

[HisArpy]

The data they're referring to refutes what GP is asserting about it.

And the OP.ignores that....the definition of believing what you're told

THE DATA supports the OP.

The NARRATIVE, which is what you're adhering to and advancing, isn't supported by the DATA.

Try doing your own homework for a change and stop relying on people with political ideologies telling you what to think.

 

[HisArpy]

Google is your friend:

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/nat...-apparently-taken-at-texas-synagogue/3497811/

It's like they come here and loudly opine about current events while not having a single clue of what's really going on out there. Or something.

 

[ll74]

THE DATA supports the OP.

The NARRATIVE, which is what you're adhering to and advancing, isn't supported by the DATA.

Try doing your own homework for a change and stop relying on people with political ideologies telling you what to think.

That's absolutely false. Ive looked at the data and the summary of the data. GP is misrepresenting the report for dipshits like you who apparently can't read

They've consistently presented an incorrect interpretation that doesn't properly represent the percentages and numbers in the report.