Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea what you're trying to say.
No surprise. So I'll say it with TEX-Speak.
Stephen King say writers s stuff ten pounds of shit in a 9 pound bag. They over-write their capacity to keep the story in-mind. Writers juggle to many balls.
Well if that's the case King is clearly spouting out stuff he thinks sounds good because he sure as hell doesn't write like that. He goes on and on.
The original Stand is 800+ pages. Once he blew up he released an uncut version 1100+ words and know what? Whoever cut out those 300 words was a good edior because it was all garbage and filler.
Not to mention in pretty much every book he goes off on some type of memory, dream, tangent, rant to make some type of weird point in the middle of a scene that's so long you forget what was happening in real time.
Can't argue with his success and some of his first books are in my top 20 of all time, but he does not practice what he preaches.
SK's early efforts are good, in the 80s things went to hell. SK says drugs made him famous, and he cant write sober. Its all in interviews.
Carrie, Salem's Lot, The Stand were all excellent. Pet Sematary may be my favorite. The last real good one I felt was The Dark Half. It was close to a thousand pages....case in point.
Agree about King. He's written many enjoyable books but he does not edit himself. Salem's Lot was great because he stuck with fairly brisk pacing, didn't go off on too many tangents, and moved things along to an appropriate end. In later books, like Under the Dome or 11/22/63, he just went on and on. I don't think he knew how to end them, so he just kept going. Each of those books could have been half as long and twice as good.
His short stories are great because they don't have this problem.
No surprise. So I'll say it with TEX-Speak.
Stephen King say writers s stuff ten pounds of shit in a 9 pound bag. They over-write their capacity to keep the story in-mind. Writers juggle to many balls.
Well if that's the case King is clearly spouting out stuff he thinks sounds good because he sure as hell doesn't write like that. He goes on and on.
The original Stand is 800+ pages. Once he blew up he released an uncut version 1100+ words and know what? Whoever cut out those 300 words was a good edior because it was all garbage and filler.
Not to mention in pretty much every book he goes off on some type of memory, dream, tangent, rant to make some type of weird point in the middle of a scene that's so long you forget what was happening in real time.
Can't argue with his success and some of his first books are in my top 20 of all time, but he does not practice what he preaches.