Justice Thomas Proves Again Why He Is The All Time Greatest

[Rightguide]

READ IT: Justice Clarence Thomas Proves Yet Again Why He’s The ‘All Time Greatest’​

By Tim Meads
•
Jun 29, 2023 DailyWire.com

“The great failure of this country was slavery and its progeny,” Thomas wrote. “And, the tragic failure of this Court was its misinterpretation of the Reconstruction Amendments, as Justice Harlan predicted in Plessy. We should not repeat this mistake merely because we think, as our predecessors thought, that the present arrangements are superior to the Constitution.”

“While I am painfully aware of the social and economic ravages which have befallen my race and all who suffer discrimination, I hold out enduring hope that this country will live up to its principles so clearly enunciated in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States: that all men are created equal, are equal citizens, and must be treated equally before the law,”

And in criticism of Justice Jackson's dissent:

Thomas wrote that Jackson’s “race-infused world view falls flat at each step. Individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges, and accomplishments. What matters is not the barriers they face, but how they choose to confront them. And their race is not to blame for everything—good or bad—that happens in their lives. A contrary, myopic world view based on individuals’ skin color to the total exclusion of their personal choices is nothing short of racial determinism.”

“Jackson then builds from her faulty premise to call for action, arguing that courts should defer to ‘experts’ and allow institutions to discriminate on the basis of race. Make no mistake: Her dissent is not a vanguard of the innocent and helpless. It is instead a call to empower privileged elites, who will ‘tell us [what] is required to level the playing field’ among castes and classifications that they alone can divine…Then, after siloing us all into racial castes and pitting those castes against each other, the dis-sent somehow believes that we will be able—at some undefined point—to ‘march forward together’ into some utopian vision…Social movements that invoke these sorts of rallying cries, historically, have ended disastrously.”

More here: https://www.dailywire.com/news/read...ust-read-opinion-in-affirmative-action-ruling

Such clarity of thought is impossible in the leftist mind.

 

[Bray123]

Just to be clear, Clarence would never have been considered for SCOTUS except for his wife being an insurrectionist.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Just to be clear, Clarence would never have been considered for SCOTUS except for his wife being an insurrectionist.

What?

 

[Rightguide]

What?

Yes, Bray is correctly named.

 

[HisArpy]

I liked his reference to Brown, which had already determined that affirmative action for education was unconstitutional.

 

[Rightguide]

I liked his reference to Brown, which had already determined that affirmative action for education was unconstitutional.

Apparently, he felt that certain people needed a helping of remedial instruction.

 

[Lazaran]

•
“Justice” Clarence Thomas: “Right”guide’s “one black friend”…… for “some reason”

“Right”guide

 

[schism666]

He has been open about the fact that he made it to Yale because of affirmative action

Clarence Thomas Benefited From Race-Based Preferences Throughout His Career​

 

[schism666]

•
“Justice” Clarence Thomas: “Right”guide’s “one black friend”…… for “some reason”

“Right”guide

 

[LincolnDuncan]

READ IT: Justice Clarence Thomas Proves Yet Again Why He’s The ‘All Time Greatest’​

By Tim Meads
•
Jun 29, 2023 DailyWire.com

“The great failure of this country was slavery and its progeny,” Thomas wrote. “And, the tragic failure of this Court was its misinterpretation of the Reconstruction Amendments, as Justice Harlan predicted in Plessy. We should not repeat this mistake merely because we think, as our predecessors thought, that the present arrangements are superior to the Constitution.”

“While I am painfully aware of the social and economic ravages which have befallen my race and all who suffer discrimination, I hold out enduring hope that this country will live up to its principles so clearly enunciated in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States: that all men are created equal, are equal citizens, and must be treated equally before the law,”

And in criticism of Justice Jackson's dissent:

Thomas wrote that Jackson’s “race-infused world view falls flat at each step. Individuals are the sum of their unique experiences, challenges, and accomplishments. What matters is not the barriers they face, but how they choose to confront them. And their race is not to blame for everything—good or bad—that happens in their lives. A contrary, myopic world view based on individuals’ skin color to the total exclusion of their personal choices is nothing short of racial determinism.”

“Jackson then builds from her faulty premise to call for action, arguing that courts should defer to ‘experts’ and allow institutions to discriminate on the basis of race. Make no mistake: Her dissent is not a vanguard of the innocent and helpless. It is instead a call to empower privileged elites, who will ‘tell us [what] is required to level the playing field’ among castes and classifications that they alone can divine…Then, after siloing us all into racial castes and pitting those castes against each other, the dis-sent somehow believes that we will be able—at some undefined point—to ‘march forward together’ into some utopian vision…Social movements that invoke these sorts of rallying cries, historically, have ended disastrously.”

More here: https://www.dailywire.com/news/read...ust-read-opinion-in-affirmative-action-ruling

Such clarity of thought is impossible in the leftist mind.

Says the guy who played the race card at his nomination hearing. "This is nothing more than a high-tech lynching of an uppity black man who aspires to be better" or some shit like that. No Clarence, it's about a highly credible witness who has testified to you sexually harassing her.

 

[Lazaran]

He has been open about the fact that he made it to Yale because of affirmative action

Clarence Thomas Benefited From Race-Based Preferences Throughout His Career​

That ^ is “different” because “reasons” something something “reasons”.

JFC

SAD!!!

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1674422062209994755

https://twitter.com/x/status/1674422681045995525

 

[Lazaran]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1674422062209994755

https://twitter.com/x/status/1674422681045995525

•
Clarence Thomas has got to be one of those body snatched brothers from the movie “Get Out”.

Was that movie influenced by Clarence Thomas???

JFC

SAD!!!

 

[PaxNurgle]

He has been open about the fact that he made it to Yale because of affirmative action

Clarence Thomas Benefited From Race-Based Preferences Throughout His Career​

Basically, this says it all.

I mean, I get his logic behind all of this; Uncle Thomas does not want to be seen as a project of affirmative action, but rather wants to be seen has having been successful purely on his own merits. Understandable.

Also understandable that not everyone with his qualifications will get the same chance to be successful on their own merits the way he did, after he ruled the way he did.

As for his being the "greatest justice ever" if you do not support the Bill of Rights, limited executive government power, personal freedom, checks and balances, or the very concept of a free society, then I suppose that yes, you would think he was the greatest justice ever. Rightguide clearly opposes these things. So does the governments of Russia, North Korea and Iran; who have a governmental system that Thomas's rulings would be far more suitable for. But clearly, he has demonstrated time and time again that he is unsuited to be a justice for the American democratic system, the American Constitution, and it's Bill of Rights.

Regardless of his past crude playboy/jock actions, regardless of your opinion on affirmative action- and I get both the arguments for it and against it- it is clear that an extreme anti-liberty/anti-Democracy activist such as Thomas has no buisness serving on that court, and he never did.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

•
Clarence Thomas has got to be one of those body snatched brothers from the movie “Get Out”.

Was that movie influenced by Clarence Thomas???

JFC

SAD!!!

Your wild imagination is hysterical and we all enjoy it. But sorry, no body snatchers. He’s just a kid who grew up in the south and serves us as a Supreme Court justice.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Serves us or his “life long” billionaire buddy and his insurrectionist wife??

 

[Lazaran]

Serves us or his “life long” billionaire buddy and his insurrectionist wife??

•
So weird how Tim Scott also has a white Billionaire BFF.

Probably just a coincidence.

 

[HisArpy]

Apparently, he felt that certain people needed a helping of remedial instruction.

Winsome Sears did a wonderful smackdown of KBJ being a "diversity hire." It was awesome to read.

 

[Rightguide]

Serves us or his “life long” billionaire buddy and his insurrectionist wife??

Stop with the nonsense.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Stop with the nonsense.

^^^
more bed-wetting.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Stop with the nonsense.

It is not nonsense. It is a clear conflict of interest and for many, many reasons, there should have been an official bi-partisan inquiry to remove him from the bench, long ago, both for his wife's actions and for his blatant bias, judicial activism, and disregard for the Constitution.

 

[HisArpy]

It is not nonsense. It is a clear conflict of interest and for many, many reasons, there should have been an official bi-partisan inquiry to remove him from the bench, long ago, both for his wife's actions and for his blatant bias, judicial activism, and disregard for the Constitution.

It's funny that you seem to believe that having a conflict of interest requires removal from the court.

I'm fairly certain that this belief stems from a few misunderstandings on your part rather than it being reality.

It's not a conflict of interest to have an interaction with a person who is wealthy. It's not a conflict of interest to have friends in well connected places. It's not a conflict of interest to be a general consumer or investor either.

A conflict of interest would be where you have a personal stake in the outcome either because you're personally involved, or you have a controlling interest.

This does not apply to Thomas in the current circlejerk narrative.

Further, Ginny has the same rights under the Constitution as you or I. That means she can write her representatives and even the White House and NOTHING can be said against her doing so. Nor can it be used against her or imputed against her Supreme Court justice husband.

The bias/activism/blah blah blah is nothing more than you parroting the media pundits who have successfully brainwashed you because they have incubated a culture of hate as manifested by your malicious postings and attitude.