Justice Anthony Kennedy: "Gays ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law."

[Busybody]

Justice Anthony Kennedy: "Gays ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law."

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIgI26FVEAA3pql.jpg

 

[Busybody]

DIGNITY!


#LoveWins Crowd Not So Lovable: Verbally Abuse Iraq Vet For Being Amputee, ‘Killing Children, Raping Women’



J.R. Salzman is a champion log roller and disabled Iraq war veteran who lost his right arm below the elbow, and had his left hand crushed.

He was commenting on the gay marriage case on Twitter when he came under twitter attack by despicable people who attacked him for losing an arm and being a veteran therefore ‘killing children and raping women’.



In addition to the despicable attack on him for being an amputee, one of the attackers also pulled out one of the left’s favorite canards about the military, going back to the Vietnam war, that they ‘kill children’ and ‘rape women’.

 

[Busybody]

DIGNITY!


NYC priest excuses gay marriage supporters who spat on him: ‘I deserve worse’ http://******/1CEP1x7 @JessicaChasmar

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Kennedy reminds me of General John Pope at the Battle of 2nd Manassas moments before he found Lee and Stonewall Jackson many miles closer than he thought they were. After Lincoln pulled Jacksons boot from Popes ass he put the poor dear on a slow bus to the West.

 

[Busybody]

 

[BoyNextDoor]

The way some people are reacting you would think that the SJC ruling has anything to do with heterosexual people. But it has none. If you are hetero this ruling has nothing to do with you and does not affect you in any way. Zero impact. Zilch. Na da.

 

[hashtag45]

So true.
Take me, for instance : I tend to get bitchy only when someone is mean towards me first. Or mean tw. someone that I like.
But some people enjoy picking on everyone. And a particular segment of right-wingers - the same

 

[hashtag45]

wasn't talking about U, BB, , no need fo taht

cause you might be mean when you're generalising
but on a 1:1 ---you're a sweetheart to everybody

 

[Busybody]

The way some people are reacting you would think that the SJC ruling has anything to do with heterosexual people. But it has none. If you are hetero this ruling has nothing to do with you and does not affect you in any way. Zero impact. Zilch. Na da.

except bakeries, florists Church's etc....companies etc will now be sued for billins for past discrimination etc

it starts

why not incest marriages

pologamist marriages etc

 

[contrifan32]

The way some people are reacting you would think that the SJC ruling has anything to do with heterosexual people. But it has none. If you are hetero this ruling has nothing to do with you and does not affect you in any way. Zero impact. Zilch. Na da.

WRONG! We are all effected when some or all of the Supremes base there decisions on feelings and not the law. When the court legislates when they are suppose to judicate they are not doing the job they were appointed to do.