Just Luck I suppose.

[FEELINGLUCKYPUNK]

I looked at a couple LIT stories.

The first was teen sex where two girls fuck all the jocks then each other.

The 2nd story is an anti Trump tirade.

 

[KeithD]

I looked at a couple LIT stories.

The first was teen sex where two girls fuck all the jocks then each other.

The 2nd story is an anti Trump tirade.

Report them to Laurel, if you like. There's a convenient button on the story to report them for Laurel's review and there's nothing anyone posting here can do about it other than yammer about it yet again with you--that is if you actually have found such stories. You provide no evidence you have.

 

[LupusDei]

What's wrong with the first one? I may want to read such. As long as they're all seniors it is deemed to be in compliance with age rules.

The second is harder to justify here (not that I wouldn't agree perhaps, feel no love for the con artist), but really depends how it's written. Actually, I just read a great and fun story that did used Trump administration as a plot device for its own goals, without sinking into any political discourse at all.

 

[KeithD]

You're falling into what the OP, JBJ, wants from this thread--taboo discussion on the AH. Laurel doesn't accept political partisan stories, which is the definitive answer what would be wrong with the second listed story (and doesn't want partisan politics on the AH). There probably isn't such a story that James has actually identified, though; James plays games with the edge of what the Web site wants discussed where. The first is inviting yet another discussion of underage stories. He probably doesn't have real ones identified in the file for that topic either. You'll notice none are cited.

And now he's going to post a personal attack on me. This is what he does when he's bored and not getting attention.

 

[LupusDei]

You're falling into what the OP, JBJ, wants from this thread--taboo discussion on the AH.

OK, thanks, I suspected that might be the case, and does explain your somewhat harsh reaction.

Sorry for participating, then.

 

[Handpop]

Report them to Laurel, if you like. There's a convenient button on the story to report them for Laurel's review and there's nothing anyone posting here can do about it other than yammer about it yet again with you--that is if you actually have found such stories. You provide no evidence you have.

I'm not sure if that button is still working properly. Almost two weeks ago I reported a story and nothing happened afterwards.

I should mention it is an older, Dutch story. I copy-pasted the text-lines where two girls were introduced as being 13 and 15 years old, and the text-lines where their naked bodies are being described, evaluated and compared with their mother. It was the first part of a story that never continued afterwards; perhaps the following parts were rejected because of underage sex, but I think even that first chapter went too far.

Even though it is in Dutch, it shouldn't be too hard to translate the few sentences that I provided into English (I suggested Google Translate) and check for their content.

 

[FEELINGLUCKYPUNK]

You're falling into what the OP, JBJ, wants from this thread--taboo discussion on the AH. Laurel doesn't accept political partisan stories, which is the definitive answer what would be wrong with the second listed story (and doesn't want partisan politics on the AH). There probably isn't such a story that James has actually identified, though; James plays games with the edge of what the Web site wants discussed where. The first is inviting yet another discussion of underage stories. He probably doesn't have real ones identified in the file for that topic either. You'll notice none are cited.

And now he's going to post a personal attack on me. This is what he does when he's bored and not getting attention.

I don't pose as female.

 

[TxRad]

I don't pose as female.

Nope, you just pose in general.

*And now for the attack on me*

 

[BentonVirtus]

... Almost two weeks ago I reported a story and nothing happened afterwards.

I should mention it is an older, Dutch story. I copy-pasted the text-lines where two girls were introduced as being 13 and 15 years old, and the text-lines where their naked bodies are being described, evaluated and compared with their mother. ...

I would normally be passionate about a discussion of how nudity and body image are not equivalent to illegal sexual activity. However, I understand it's troll food and I won't feed the trolls. Well, perhaps just a snack.

 

[Handpop]

I would normally be passionate about a discussion of how nudity and body image are not equivalent to illegal sexual activity. However, I understand it's troll food and I won't feed the trolls. Well, perhaps just a snack.

Not sure if you consider me to be a troll, but I find it hard to be passionate about a story in Incest/Taboo, describing in more detail the shaved pussies of 13 and 15 year old girls, the size of their breasts and the hardness of their nipples, combined with a semi-erect cock of the male protagonist.

Regardless of our opinion, it seems to be against the rules of Literotica.

 

[KeithD]

I don't pose as female.

Not that that's relevant to me or the thread.

 

[BentonVirtus]

First message:

text-lines where two girls were introduced as being 13 and 15 years old, and the text-lines where their naked bodies are being described, evaluated and compared with their mother.

Second message:

describing in more detail the shaved pussies of 13 and 15 year old girls, the size of their breasts and the hardness of their nipples, combined with a semi-erect cock of the male protagonist.

That is not what you said the first time and I agree that what you said the second time does sound more like a sexual situation involving minors, which is against the rules. However, I would not be able to read the original, so I must take your word for it.

But, in any case, it is the type of exchange that you and I have just engaged in here that I refer to as the troll food desired by the OP. I apologize for any misunderstanding, while reiterating my belief that situations of nudity are not, in and of themselves, sexual encounters.

 

[AH_Mod]

Regardless of anyone's opinion, for the purposes of Literotica, nudity is considered sexual, and therefore off-limits to discuss for anyone under 18.

This thread had little purpose other than to stir up trouble by referencing both underage and politics, which are both forbidden in the AH. I have no control over the stories. Report them via the provided functions on the story pages.

Final Warning: FEELINGLUCKYPUNK. That stands for both of the forbidden subjects in this thread. As you have already been subjected to two temporary bans, any further violation concerning these two forbidden subjects will result in a request for a permanent forum ban, which I will apply to this name, any known alts, and any names created in the future.

Everyone else please take note, and steer away from these subjects in the future. The one is forbidden anywhere on Literotica. The other has a home in the politics sub-forum of the site.