Juspar Presents

Well they did me! Wow. You are a good photographer. Oh, ummm. not that I noticed the subject of course.
hahaha... Hey, got an idea. You could photograph those lit members who are incapable of figuring out how to do it for themselves. Like me. Of course, that means spending your days wandering the country and taking erotic photos all the time.
Do you mind?
No, seriously. Love them.
 
Thanks M, I'd love to take photos of all the Litites. These photos are all, and will be all for the forseeable future, self portraits. I love taking photos though and would just as happily shoot the guys as the girls. Of course the girls would all get after shoot attention that the guys don't. ;)


Originally posted by Merelan
Like me. Of course, that means spending your days wandering the country and taking erotic photos all the time.
Do you mind?

Send me a plane ticket and I'm there . . . with bells on :p


[Edited by Juspar Emvan on 02-18-2001 at 06:22 AM]
 
Cause we are special, and soft and cuddly... right?
It would be a tough job, but someone needs to do it.
 
Very, very nice. Good photos, excellent subject material. We ladies need more pics like that, especially first thing in the morning.
 
Well taken pic, nice subject material.

But...hey...instead of just scrambling the face, try something else. It detracts from the overall effect. Maybe different lighting, or a mask of some kind...or...somethin'

I mean...here's this GREAT B&W nude with a pulled punch detracting from the overall effect. If you had your face turned in profile with a black hat dipped low to cover your features, for example, that would still have preserved your anonymity, but contributed to the mood instead of taking away.

Besides...there was so much more to look at...I hated that the scrambled pixels drew my eyes up ;)

Just MHO

MP
 
Madame . . .

I am indebted.

I saw your name as the last to post in the board and just before opening the thread, said to my self out loud "Oh here we go". To my chagrin what you posted was not only flattering but helpful too, thank you very much. I will certainly take that into account in future additions to the site. Heck I may even grow some balls and dispense with the anon look altogether - shame I hate my face.
 
ROFLMAO...

I love that I inspire such trepidation.

Next time I'll try to live up to your expectations ;-)

In the meantime, the women of Lit need more tasteful beefcake to look at, so warm up that camera.

MP
 
Cheyenne said:
Nice pics- you left out my favorite one though. ;)

I know, like I said I need feedback before I expand it.

But given enough of the righ feed back, you know I will expand it.
 
Madame Pandora said:
ROFLMAO...

;-)

In the meantime, the women of Lit need more tasteful beefcake to look at, so warm up that camera.

MP

Here's some more feedback, Juspar. :) Give us more!!!
 
Madame

In particular, but open to all.

I've just added a 2nd verson to one of the pics, blurred instead of pixels. Comments please.





BTW, yes there is more lots more - tell'em ladies.
 
OMG

Am I the only one to think that the little bit of hair visible above his hands is INCREDIBLY sexy? Love trails...yum.
ON a more serious note, I also agree with the Madame (when don't I?lol) that the pixelization detracts from the photos. The bluring is a step in the right direction, but I still think Madame's ideas are better. Whip out that camera guy. Besides I think a face photo is a great idea. And you should know that we women of Lit are more interested in what goes on inside his head.....and maybe in his pants....than to judge his simply by what his face looks like. Give us more credit than that!
 
Re: OMG

Cheri said:
Am I the only one to think that the little bit of hair visible above his hands is INCREDIBLY sexy? Love trails...yum.
ON a more serious note, I also agree with the Madame (when don't I?lol) that the pixelization detracts from the photos. The bluring is a step in the right direction, but I still think Madame's ideas are better. Whip out that camera guy. Besides I think a face photo is a great idea. And you should know that we women of Lit are more interested in what goes on inside his head.....and maybe in his pants....than to judge his simply by what his face looks like. Give us more credit than that!

Ok Cheri, first - thanks, *blush, but only a bit 'cause it's not manly*.
Second, the blured face is primarily because I have a RL too, and I'm not so sure about having my cyber personality being readily identifed with my of-line reality. As far as giving you credit, I give Lit wome huge amounts of credit in that arena, more than I do most women I interact with in RL. It's me that doesn't like my face, not that I think you wont - I don't care (well, much anyway).
 
The blur is much better. Gives the face a smooth appearance of texture, like marble. With a little more tinkering, you might be able to blur your shoulders too, give the effect that as you travel down your body the stone turns to flesh. Just a thought ;-) Only don’t you dare blur out anything from the nipples down. Too yummy. Of course, it's nice the way it is, too. I just think, if you're going to yield to a technical limit, incorporate it into a creative result ;-)

I love the crossed fists. But then, I'm attracted to those vein-like cords that stretch across men's wrists and arms.

The fists add a little tension to the otherwise calm pose.

;) MP
 
Madame

The hands again? This turn of events is interesting.

Thanks for the feedback on the masking issue. I have some interesting ideas now for some new shots, but they will take a while as the next film is already on it's way to the developers.

I agree that a masking at the point of exposure would be better than one digitally applied. I'll have to work on it. Makes it interesting if I can't see what's going on, self portraits remember. I think there is one in the next set that you will really like though.
 
Juspar Emvan said:


But given enough of the righ feed back, you know I will expand it.
Oh, I know you can expand it, that's for sure. Those expanded pics are worth waiting for. ;)
 
Hey wait. Has Cheyenne seen more? Is she your quality control woman? lucky bitch...
 
'More' has been freely available, on request (and fair trade) for some time. Oh, did you miss out? Well send me an e-male addy then.
 
Back
Top