LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Judges as unelected Presidents

if there is a legitimate issue that a president is likely to be stopped at the Supreme Court I can see fast-tracking it from Judge to Circuit to the Supreme Court but the idea of issuing a temporary injunction which can be issued at any time by any judge over anything is absolutely not anyway to run a country.

Are not in favor of a Saturday night Massacre however judges serve at the pappointment of the president. With a friendly Congress you can impeach all of them and install his own is that what we're going to have every time power shifts.

The label on scotus simply means that it is the Supreme Court of the land not that it is supreme to the executive branch. Much less some federal judge.
 
Conager said:
if there is a legitimate issue that a president is likely to be stopped at the Supreme Court I can see fast-tracking it from Judge to Circuit to the Supreme Court but the idea of issuing a temporary injunction which can be issued at any time by any judge over anything is absolutely not anyway to run a country.

Are not in favor of a Saturday night Massacre however judges serve at the pappointment of the president. With a friendly Congress you can impeach all of them and install his own is that what we're going to have every time power shifts.

The label on scotus simply means that it is the Supreme Court of the land not that it is supreme to the executive branch. Much less some federal judge.
Click to expand...

Isn't it amazing how willing the judges of the Ninth Circus are to assume Presidential responsibility? It's like they are taking marching orders from the DNC.
 
Conager said:
if there is a legitimate issue that a president is likely to be stopped at the Supreme Court I can see fast-tracking it from Judge to Circuit to the Supreme Court but the idea of issuing a temporary injunction which can be issued at any time by any judge over anything is absolutely not anyway to run a country.

Are not in favor of a Saturday night Massacre however judges serve at the pappointment of the president. With a friendly Congress you can impeach all of them and install his own is that what we're going to have every time power shifts.

The label on scotus simply means that it is the Supreme Court of the land not that it is supreme to the executive branch. Much less some federal judge.
Click to expand...

Who decides that? Perhaps we need a gate-keeper for access to the courts?
 
Strong Horse Trump should ignore them

How msny divisions does the so called alleged Judges have
 
It's called 'checks and balances' and it's designed to stop abuses by rogue wannabee dictators.


The Judiciary is independent of the other two branches for good reason and they are effectively equal in power in may ways.

It's probably easier to remove a President than a Federal Judge. I only know of that happening a very few times and it's usually for criminal acts. There was one in Texas not too long ago as I recall.

A Judge cannot be removed because people don't like their rulings.
 
I disremember the writer but the idea of the progressives simply refuse to submit to any authority that they are not, at the time, in charge of, was completely apt.

The last administration had an attorney general in contempt of congress. if Republicans had any stones, they would have impeached him and removed him from office for cause. It doesn't matter what branch the Democrats control, they simply leverage it into getting whatever it is that they want.

When the Republicans were out of power it was them shutting down the government when they refused to go along with Obama's budget. Now that the Democrats are going to refuse to go along with Trump's budget it's Trump shutting down the government.

They're very good at heads I win tails you lose because they control the narrative.
 
Last edited:
I don't believe Gorsuch to be a legitimate Justice since McConnell bastardized the process.
 
Conager said:
The last administration had an attorney general in contempt of congress. if Republicans had any Stones they would have been pitched him and remove him from office for cause.
Click to expand...

Since there's no statute of limitations for murder, Holder could (and should) still be prosecuted.
 
jaF0 said:
I don't believe Gorsuch to be a legitimate Justice since McConnell bastardized the process.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:


So when the Democrats changed the rules to protect them from conservative judges, were the Liberal judges thus placed similarly 'illegitimate?'
 
jaF0 said:
I don't believe Gorsuch to be a legitimate Justice since McConnell bastardized the process.
Click to expand...

You can 'consider' anything you want, but there he sits on the court. (Forcing that issue was one of the stupidest moves the democrats have made in ages.)

So what's your plan? Ignore any rulings that he has a hand in that you don't like? Let me know how that works out for you.

Ishmael
 
Ishmael said:
You can 'consider' anything you want, but there he sits on the court. (Forcing that issue was one of the stupidest moves the democrats have made in ages.)

So what's your plan? Ignore any rulings that he has a hand in that you don't like? Let me know how that works out for you.

Ishmael
Click to expand...

How can you continue to support a party that fucking stupid unless you are...,

:eek:

... so fucking stupid that you would consider the idea that too many Marines could tip Guam over...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Encaea
How Do You Make Scheduled Sex Exciting?
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
MuscularOiledSlave
M
G
Sexual Chemistry for an LTR
Replies
7
Views
265
gaindianguy4u
G
M
Finally got my partner to call me names 😍
Replies
13
Views
863
Raybies93
R
Stopokochac
Why would a girl who only likes you as a friend be receptive of you showing interest and even indulge you with pics, but then call you a "creep"?
Replies
20
Views
862
Qky75
Qky75
TryingTooHard
What Should Your Wife Wear to your Boss's Party?
2 3
Replies
50
Views
3K
JS1979
JS1979
Back
Top