Judge in South Carolina Shocks Leftists

[Rightguide]

Judge in South Carolina Shocks Leftists with Bombshell Ruling: Voter Rolls Are Public Record Under Federal Law​

by Jim Hᴏft Sep. 20, 2024 8:45 am

In a landmark ruling, a federal judge in South Carolina has declared that voter rolls are public records and must be made available for inspection by election integrity advocates, a decision that could set a precedent nationwide.

The ruling, issued by Judge Joseph F. Anderson Jr. of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, came in response to a lawsuit filed by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), a nonprofit organization dedicated to election integrity.

PILF sought access to the South Carolina Statewide Voter Registration List under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993, which mandates that states maintain accurate voter rolls and make records available for public inspection. The SEC initially denied the request.

The SEC argued that South Carolina law only permitted access to these records by qualified electors of the state, not by out-of-state organizations like PILF.

Ruling here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...olina-shocks-leftists-bombshell-ruling-voter/

Another check against Democrat voter fraud.

 

[ll74]

Voter roll management is the state's responsibility. It happens in each state based on their election laws that exist.

Not cleaning up voter rolls on some imagined frequency does not equate to voter fraud

 

[DeluxAuto]

Another check against Democrat voter fraud.

How many fraudulent votes were proven to be in favor of Dems vs pubs?

You see "fraud" and immediately attach to Dems when pubs do most of the frauding.

 

[Rightguide]

Voter roll management is the state's responsibility. It happens in each state based on their election laws that exist.

Not cleaning up voter rolls on some imagined frequency does not equate to voter fraud

Judge ruled:

South Carolina’s prohibition on distribution of the SVRL to only eligible South Carolina voters conflicts with the NVRA’s mandate that all records concerning maintenance and accuracy activities be made available for “public inspection.”

Because adherence to South Carolina law would frustrate the application of the federal mandate, the state law must yield.

 

[ll74]

Judge ruled:

South Carolina’s prohibition on distribution of the SVRL to only eligible South Carolina voters conflicts with the NVRA’s mandate that all records concerning maintenance and accuracy activities be made available for “public inspection.”

Because adherence to South Carolina law would frustrate the application of the federal mandate, the state law must yield.

again, nothing about this suggests there was voter fraud.

 

[Rightguide]

again, nothing about this suggests there was voter fraud.

No one said there was. It's a ruling that will help to detect and stop voter fraud.

 

[ll74]

No one said there was. It's a ruling that will help to detect and stop voter fraud.

Of course...

."Another check against Democrat voter fraud..."

 

[Rightguide]

Of course...

That's right, it's an enduring issue.

 

[ll74]

That's right, it's an enduring issue.

Voter fraud is not isolated to one party, dipshit. Voter rolls are stale in every state, consistently

 

[DeluxAuto]

That's right, it's an enduring issue.

He's just proved you lied. Grow a pair and make-up, Jack.