John Solomon Reporting Vindicated By The Hill Investigation

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
61,957
I post this for Pecksniff who routinely attacks the veracity of John Solomon on a regular basis despite being schooled by me and others:

Statement of John Solomon regarding The Hill columns


By Just the News staff
Updated: March 31, 2022 - 3:36pm


I'am grateful that The Hill has published an update to its review of my Ukraine reporting and other articles. This points out what I have said that I did not engage in a conflict of interest by quoting Joe diGenova or Victoria Toensing in 2017 because they were not my attorneys at the time.

I am also grateful that The Hill’s newsroom review did not identify a single factual error in any of my columns. Indeed, after months of digging into claims from liberal media and impeachment witnesses that my reporting was false, The Hill found nothing to fault under my reporting.

Although the Review ultimately did not undermine what I reported, I remain disappointed that The Hill did not seek to interview me.

The criticism of my work in the newsroom’s review involved a determination that my columns departed from standard opinion content because they contained too many facts and revelations. To that, I plead guilty. For over a century of great journalism, opinion columnists from Jack Anderson to David Broder to Robert Novak broke enormous stories, factually documented, on the opinion pages of their publications, just like I did at The Hill. I feel no need to apologize for trying to follow in that tradition or to inform the American public.

I wish all my former colleagues at The Hill the best of success. I will continue to read The Hill’s pages, and hope that it always publishes balanced, factual reporting that characterizes the best of journalism.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/statement-john-solomon-regarding-hill-columns
 
Solomon was executive editor of the Washington Times. He therefore has zero credibility.
 
Solomon was executive editor of the Washington Times. He therefore has zero credibility.
^^^
Hopelessly intellectually jaundiced.

John Solomon, as I've told you in the past, is a nationally recognized investigative reporter going back decades:
http://www.rfkcenter.org/node/107

He's been investigating and writing correct but inconvenient stories about Democrat corruption and lies, like Clinton corruption, the Russian Collusion lies, the phony FISA Warrants, FBI corruption, and many other subjects you hate and condemn ideologically but not factually. He has vast experience:

Founder, CEO and Editor in Chief
Just the News
Feb 2020 - Present 2 years 3 months

Executive Vice President
The Hill
Jul 2017 - Oct 2019 2 years 4 months
Washington, District Of Columbia

Chief Creative Officer
Circa News
Jan 2016 - Jun 2017 1 year 6 months
Washington D.C. Metro Area

Editor and Vice President for Content and Business Development
The Washington Times
Jan 2013 - Dec 2015 3 years
Washington D.C. Metro Area

President
Packard Media Group
Nov 2009 - Dec 2015 6 years 2 months

Journalist in Residence
Center for Public Integrity
Mar 2010 - Jun 2011 1 year 4 months

Executive Editor
The Washington Times
Jan 2008 - Nov 2009 1 year 11 months

Investigative correspondent
The Washington Post
Dec 2006 - Jan 2008 1 year 2 months

Assistant Chief of Bureau
The Associated Press
May 1987 - Dec 2006 19 years 8 months
Washington DC
 
Back
Top