LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

John Kerry threatens Ecuador, silence Assange!

snugglestruggle

snugglestruggle

...
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Posts
7,373
John Kerry went whining to the ambassador to Ecuador "Assange is exposing all of Hillary's corruption, it's not fair! You're interfering in our 2016 election and ruining her coronation, make him disappear or you will!"

Nobody has seen or heard from Assange since his internet was cut off, he basically disappeared into a black hole.

Rumor has it he has been renditioned to the Smithfield airport in N.C. (a known CIA rendition waypoint). If he is lucky, he'll get a CIA prison, if not having his face rubbed in Hillary's puss filled, rotting snatch would be the worst case scenario.

Did he get a free ride on N379P, aka the Guantanamo Express? Where is Julian Assange???
 
Great catch, if they got him. :)

Maybe he's got a lot of Trump and RNC e-mails that we all can read.
 
Maybe the Democrats are grilling him about the best way to rig the election.
 
It wouldn't surprise me if they did snatch him, wiki leaks has done the job the media refused to do. It's an act of desperation if they did grab him. All the Clinton dirt is coming out now with the Wiki leaks / Gucifer document dumps.
 
snugglestruggle said:
It wouldn't surprise me if they did snatch him, wiki leaks has done the job the media refused to do. It's an act of desperation if they did grab him. All the Clinton dirt is coming out now with the Wiki leaks / Gucifer document dumps.
Click to expand...

No, it hasn't done a complete job. It's only published the Dems' e-mails. To be fair, it needs to publish Trump's and the RNC's e-mails too. Now those would be interesting.
 
sr71plt said:
No, it hasn't done a complete job. It's only published the Dems' e-mails. To be fair, it needs to publish Trump's and the RNC's e-mails too. Now those would be interesting.
Click to expand...

You could have just typed Waaaaaaaaaaaa. It would have been the same thing lol.
 
snugglestruggle said:
You could have just typed Waaaaaaaaaaaa. It would have been the same thing lol.
Click to expand...

Hey, and maybe we could get him to give us all of your e-mails too. You don't seem to have a problem with people's e-mails being hacked and shared. :D
 
How can anyone know that the e-mails are genuine? Text is pretty easy to edit.
 
phrodeau said:
How can anyone know that the e-mails are genuine? Text is pretty easy to edit.
Click to expand...

The biggest clue they are genuine is that nobody directly involved and no major mainstream media outlet or USG official has pointed to a concrete example of falsification. It would be insanely easy to do this if they were fake and it would be political malpractice on the part of the Clinton campaign AND the Obama administration not to do that.

Instead, they make general statements and pundits and trolls cast aspersions on Assange, Wikileaks, how the info was gathered, and it's quality and do blatant red-baiting. That's pure spin and pretty damning.

There is also the fact that Wikileaks has a perfect record of verifying and presenting pristine documents.
 
Setanta84 said:
The biggest clue they are genuine is that nobody directly involved and no major mainstream media outlet or USG official has pointed to a concrete example of falsification. It would be insanely easy to do this if they were fake and it would be political malpractice on the part of the Clinton campaign AND the Obama administration not to do that.

Instead, they make general statements and pundits and trolls cast aspersions on Assange, Wikileaks, how the info was gathered, and it's quality and do blatant red-baiting. That's pure spin and pretty damning.

There is also the fact that Wikileaks has a perfect record of verifying and presenting pristine documents.
Click to expand...
So she's completely honest about the e-mails, but lies about everything else?

How about when Donald Trump claims that all of the women accusing him of assault are lying? Do you buy it?
 
phrodeau said:
How can anyone know that the e-mails are genuine? Text is pretty easy to edit.
Click to expand...

Well if Hillary had kept hard copies as required by law of all the work product I guess she would have proof that they were doctored. the proof that they aren't doctored is the fact that the Clinton campaign has not disputed a single word in any of them it's all deflection as per usual for the clintons.
 
phrodeau said:
So she's completely honest about the e-mails, but lies about everything else?

How about when Donald Trump claims that all of the women accusing him of assault are lying? Do you buy it?
Click to expand...

What does Hillary Clinton's trustworthiness have to do with the trustworthiness of the documents? Are you trying to say it's weird to believe the docs are authentic because she hasn't publicly articulated a compelling case they aren't? If that's what you are going for, you are just bending logic like a pretzel.

And what does Donald Trump and the allegations of assault against him have to do with Wikileaks?
 
Que said:
Well if Hillary had kept hard copies as required by law of all the work product I guess she would have proof that they were doctored. the proof that they aren't doctored is the fact that the Clinton campaign has not disputed a single word in any of them it's all deflection as per usual for the clintons.
Click to expand...

The leaks make it clear she was lying about not keeping the records. They have them. They just aren't sharing them with Congress or anyone else.
 
Setanta84 said:
What does Hillary Clinton's trustworthiness have to do with the trustworthiness of the documents? Are you trying to say it's weird to believe the docs are authentic because she hasn't publicly articulated a compelling case they aren't? If that's what you are going for, you are just bending logic like a pretzel.

And what does Donald Trump and the allegations of assault against him have to do with Wikileaks?
Click to expand...

Setanta84 said:
The leaks make it clear she was lying about not keeping the records. They have them. They just aren't sharing them with Congress or anyone else.
Click to expand...
How can they prove that the wikileak docs are fake, when they don't have the originals?
 
phrodeau said:
How can they prove that the wikileak docs are fake, when they don't have the originals?
Click to expand...

There is no evidence they are fake.

Given the amount of potential evidence that has disappeared around the clintons over the years I would say this is what's known as Poetic Justice.

They wrote the emails, they know what's in them and they haven't said "That's not what I wrote."
 
phrodeau said:
How can they prove that the wikileak docs are fake, when they don't have the originals?
Click to expand...

Assuming everything she has said about her books so far is true--and everything the FBI has released publicly shows it is not--they still have big chunks of the records. It would be insanely easy to cross reference what they do have--if it is as limited as they claim publicly and not whole as the leaks show--with what has been released and point out doctored emails.

Outside of fever dream conspiracies, there is no way to doctor docs in such a way that people who created the docs and have access to some of them can't prove they were doctored. If you have access to pristine docs and are looking at doctored copies, picking a few concrete examples out of this amount of data would be stupidly easy.
 
Que said:
There is no evidence they are fake.

Given the amount of potential evidence that has disappeared around the clintons over the years I would say this is what's known as Poetic Justice.

They wrote the emails, they know what's in them and they haven't said "That's not what I wrote."
Click to expand...
If she said that, and produced the documents to back it up, would you believe her?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
John FAG Kerry threatens Russia with war crimes
Replies
10
Views
498
underguy1
underguy1
Back
Top