Jeri and Kimmi
- Thread starter Dillinger
- Start date
Dillinger
Guerrilla Ontologist
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2000
- Posts
- 26,152
Nicole - hell that would take a few hours of typing, *lol* They've been discussed pretty well in a number of threads here. You might want to check out http://www.survivorsucks.com its pretty funny.
In short they are both whiny and annoying. I was making the observation that it was interesting that they were not also both incredibly annoying but that they actually looked alike. Through the first couple shows I actually had them confused with each other.
But hey - I'm sounding obsessed. I'm really not like that - just something about this show has me wanting to strangle chickens and stand on poles.
In short they are both whiny and annoying. I was making the observation that it was interesting that they were not also both incredibly annoying but that they actually looked alike. Through the first couple shows I actually had them confused with each other.
But hey - I'm sounding obsessed. I'm really not like that - just something about this show has me wanting to strangle chickens and stand on poles.
Oh Okay.
I have actually been told about this Kimmi girl by a friend, but I just kinda listen without listening if you know what I mean (and god help me he doesn't see this thread LOL).
I guess when you are so into a program you feel you know the people invloved. I watched one over here a few years back where the stuck 6 or 8 (can't rememeber) people in a house together, taking things away from them slowly, it was Called "House from hell" and it was put together by a Radio station over here, you could win $50 000. These people had all sorts removed from them down to the hot water in the middle of winter. But GOD IT WAS GOOD.
I can understand peoples obsession's for these show's ... Survivor is just something that I could never get into.
Now did you want a boost up that pole there???
Or is that not allowed?
I have actually been told about this Kimmi girl by a friend, but I just kinda listen without listening if you know what I mean (and god help me he doesn't see this thread LOL).
I guess when you are so into a program you feel you know the people invloved. I watched one over here a few years back where the stuck 6 or 8 (can't rememeber) people in a house together, taking things away from them slowly, it was Called "House from hell" and it was put together by a Radio station over here, you could win $50 000. These people had all sorts removed from them down to the hot water in the middle of winter. But GOD IT WAS GOOD.
I can understand peoples obsession's for these show's ... Survivor is just something that I could never get into.
Now did you want a boost up that pole there???
Or is that not allowed?
Dillinger
Guerrilla Ontologist
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2000
- Posts
- 26,152
Hey talking to you is giving my pole a boost! *grin*
I never thought I would get into Survivor - I avoided the the last season religiously except for the last episode and I was hooked from that moment on. I can't explain it and I highly recommend that you not watch the show even once unless you too want to risk your intelligence in mindless discussions of who is more annoying, Kimmi or Jerri.
Can you believe I posted this instead of starting a discussion about whether light is a particle or a wave or if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive or both?
I never thought I would get into Survivor - I avoided the the last season religiously except for the last episode and I was hooked from that moment on. I can't explain it and I highly recommend that you not watch the show even once unless you too want to risk your intelligence in mindless discussions of who is more annoying, Kimmi or Jerri.
Can you believe I posted this instead of starting a discussion about whether light is a particle or a wave or if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive or both?
Dillinger said:
Yes, Yes I can *nodding*
Plus, I'd Rather talk about this than ... well than that.
I don't think you have a problem of me watching Survivor though, you see we get it two weeks after you (just like everything else from the States), and so I already know what has happened and who has been kicked off, well before I get a chance to watch it.
Now about this cat .........
Dillinger
Guerrilla Ontologist
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2000
- Posts
- 26,152
Yes - about Schrodinger's cat... are you familiar with the paradox?
"A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following diabolical device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small that perhaps in the course of one hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid.
If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour,
one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The first atomic decay would have poisoned it. The Psi function for the entire system would express this by having in it the living and the dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts."
So at any point in time that you open the box - is the cat dead or alive? Until you actually open the box and look the cat is neither - it is in an indeterminate stage. You could even say that the cat is both dead and alive.
Some people say that's foolish. Lots of respected scientist take it seriously.
Me, I have two siamese and I do my utmost to keep them out of any boxes that seem threatening.
"A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following diabolical device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small that perhaps in the course of one hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid.
If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour,
one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The first atomic decay would have poisoned it. The Psi function for the entire system would express this by having in it the living and the dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts."
So at any point in time that you open the box - is the cat dead or alive? Until you actually open the box and look the cat is neither - it is in an indeterminate stage. You could even say that the cat is both dead and alive.
Some people say that's foolish. Lots of respected scientist take it seriously.
Me, I have two siamese and I do my utmost to keep them out of any boxes that seem threatening.
