jenny poses

G

Guest

Guest
congratulations!

Phil your set of pictures of your wife were the best of 2000.
l cannot think of a close second.
you probably could start your own site, and make alot of money.
and to top it off she looks 100% genuine, and nothing man made.
keep the pictures coming.
 
questionable!!!!!

after close examination l have come to the conclusion that the photos are professional.
what a let down.
 
Re: questionable!!!!!

kingman,

kingman said:
after close examination l have come to the conclusion that the photos are professional.
what a let down.

What makes you say they are professional?

Pooks
 
questionable!!!!!

pooks

the spacing of the pictures looks like they were spliced together.
the person taking the pictures was
a pro.
by g-d l hope that l am wrong, and l will cry l'm sorry for a week.
to put this to rest, lets wait until their next posting.
and to jenny and phil if your photos are the real thing, they are amazing.
 
the spacing of the pictures looks like they were spliced together.

Anyone can very easily splice several photos together using Photoshop - it doesn't take a professional photograper to do so. I'm not saying they're pro or not, 'cause I have no idea one way or the other, but if you're basing your argument on that point you may want to reconsider.
 
the jury is still out!!!!!

for the time being we will have to wait until they submit another photo or new series.
 
If they are amateur then they're spectacular. However, I, too, have a sneaking suspicion they are professional. Of course, the hubby taking the pictures may very well be a professional photographer. Like Kingman says, we'll have to await further exposure of the lucious Jenny. Amateur or pro, she is hot...!
 
is it real or memorex

l'm glad l'm not the only one that feels that way.
for awhile l thought it was only me!!!!!!!!!!!!
thanks budokan
 
Budokan said:
If they are amateur then they're spectacular. However, I, too, have a sneaking suspicion they are professional. Of course, the hubby taking the pictures may very well be a professional photographer.

What difference does it make if they ARE "professional" pictures? Does the label ameteur automatically mean "bad?"

I am not, and never have been empolyed as a photographer, but I could have taken and scanned those pictures easily. I haven't even been a serious hobbyist in photography, but you don't have to be fanatatical about a subject to be good at it.

All those pictures required, is a pretty lady, a reasonably expensive camera (good quality camera), good lighting, and an eye for composition. almost any halfwit could combine them into one picture with Photoshop, PaintShop Pro, or any of a dozen other programs bundled with scanners.
 
Not complaining!

wierd harold
all l, and l guess my fellow perverts want, is to see more of jenny.
and most important is to reach out and touch her.
by the way do you know of any other sites like Literotica????
 
Not complaining!

wierd harold
all l, and l guess my fellow perverts want, is to see more of jenny.
and most important is to reach out and touch her.
by the way do you know of any other sites like Literotica????
 
Wierd Harold
l guess what l am really saying is that my fellow perverts and l want the photos to be real, so that we can see more of jenny's hot body.
Better, we would love to reach out and grab her (gently).

by the way do you know of any other sites like Literotica or white shadow.
thanks
 
SORRY!!!!

Their is got to be a poltergist around here.
l tried to post several times and came up empty. now l noticed that my threads did get through.
 
kingman said:
by the way do you know of any other sites like Literotica or white shadow.
thanks

I've never been to White Shadow. 90% of my online time is spent here, or at EroticStories.com
 
Back
Top