LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
Back to the 19th century, that is.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...eproduce-the-shock-of-terminator-2?CMP=twt_gu
To ANY men's rights activist, a dependent woman is the bane of our existence. To any feminist, James Cameron's statement is the raw infantilization of women. As a direct consequence - and any right-thinking men's rights activist should see this coming - the fear and denigration of independent women also reinforces the still-enduring notion that men are little more than success objects and meat shields, a notion that conservative traditionalists and even feminists are loathe to condemn.
The only mindset that should be cheering this assclown is the tradcons. Everyone else - namely anyone living in the 21st century - should be burying their faces in their palms after reading Cameron's nonsense.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...eproduce-the-shock-of-terminator-2?CMP=twt_gu
To ANY men's rights activist, a dependent woman is the bane of our existence. To any feminist, James Cameron's statement is the raw infantilization of women. As a direct consequence - and any right-thinking men's rights activist should see this coming - the fear and denigration of independent women also reinforces the still-enduring notion that men are little more than success objects and meat shields, a notion that conservative traditionalists and even feminists are loathe to condemn.
The only mindset that should be cheering this assclown is the tradcons. Everyone else - namely anyone living in the 21st century - should be burying their faces in their palms after reading Cameron's nonsense.
