It's Schizo Night for Commercial TV's Not-Quite-Showing-Nipples Set

shereads

Sloganless
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Posts
19,242
If you're reading this, you're missing the second half of the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show, an hour-long musical extravaganza dedicated to the 99.9 percent of the female body that can be exposed on American network teleivison without eroding our morals. You know the parts I'm referring to, right?

1) The Forbidden Flesh, an area the approximate size of a cat's paw at the the front of the panties area.

2) The myserious Demon's Dots at the tip of each female breast. It used to be generally assumed that we American TV viewers could see all of the breast except for the actual nipples without damage to our children's moral values. Janet Jackson confused the issue by covering her nipples with decorative jewelry before flashing her SuperBowl half-time audience. In so doing, Jackson made us question whether covering the nipples might be just as bad as exposing them, if by covering them we make boys wonder what the nipples would look like naked.

It was the implication of nipples, and not the nipples themselves, that cost the Superbowl broadcasters an FCC fine and so terrified the commercial networks that the producers of ER edited a shot of a patient's breasts out of a breast-cancer episode.

Further confusing the matter, should your children be considering a future with the Federal Communications Commission, is the fact that CBS is broadcasting close-ups of breasts clad in little more than the wire frame that holds them up, a puff of nude-colored maribou feathers, and some glitter. Since the nipples are covered, just barely, aren't they implicity naked?

:confused:

Thought: children whose innocence was shattered by less than two seconds of Janet Jackson's implicitly exposed nipples are now two years older - many of them old enough to watch the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show with their dads. Meanwhile, their flat-chested pre-adolescent sisters cower in their bedrooms, plotting diet strategies and adding push-up bras to their Christmas wish lists.

A lot of girls will ask Santa for the Jason Timberlake song that opened tonight's fashion show. More likely to be disappointed are girls who wish for a pair of the lipstick-red latex thigh-high boots that were marching up the runway when Timberlake sang the line, "If you're bad I'll whip you."

:D

As for me, my Puritan DNA is now battling my inner porn fan for the TV remote. One of us wants to chastise sinners. The other wants to taunt that one, strip naked and run down the street in nothing but a smile and a pink feather boa.

I'm so confused!
 
Last edited:
shereads said:
If you're reading this, you're missing the second half of the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show, an hour-long musical extravaganza dedicated to the 99.9 percent of the female body that can be exposed on American network teleivison without eroding our morals. You know the parts I'm referring to, right?

1) The Forbidden Flesh, an area the approximate size of a cat's paw at the the front of the panties area.

2) The myserious Demon's Dots at the tip of each female breast. It used to be generally assumed that we American TV viewers could see all of the breast except for the actual nipples without damage to our children's moral values. Janet Jackson confused the issue by covering her nipples with decorative jewelry before flashing her SuperBowl half-time audience. In so doing, Jackson made us question whether covering the nipples might be just as bad as exposing them, if by covering them we make boys wonder what the nipples would look like naked.

It was the implication of nipples, and not the nipples themselves, that cost the Superbowl broadcasters an FCC fine and so terrified the commercial networks that the producers of ER edited a shot of a patient's breasts out of a breast-cancer episode.

Further confusing the matter, should your children be considering a future with the Federal Communications Commission, is the fact that CBS is broadcasting close-ups of breasts clad in little more than the wire frame that holds them up, a puff of nude-colored maribou feathers, and some glitter. Since the nipples are covered, just barely, aren't they implicity naked?

:confused:

Thought: children whose innocence was shattered by less than two seconds of Janet Jackson's implicitly exposed nipples are now two years older - many of them old enough to watch the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show with their dads. Meanwhile, their flat-chested pre-adolescent sisters cower in their bedrooms, plotting diet strategies and adding push-up bras to their Christmas wish lists.

A lot of girls will ask Santa for the Jason Timberlake song that opened tonight's fashion show. More likely to be disappointed are girls who wish for a pair of the lipstick-red latex thigh-high boots that were marching up the runway when Timberlake sang the line, "If you're bad I'll whip you."

:D

As for me, my Puritan DNA is now battling my inner porn fan for the TV remote. One of us wants to chastise sinners. The other wants to taunt that one, strip naked and run down the street in nothing but a smile and a pink feather boa.

I'm so confused!

LOLOLOL

Welcome to America, Land of the Free and Home of the Moral Majority.

Cat
 
shereads said:
If you're reading this, you're missing the second half of the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show, an hour-long musical extravaganza dedicated to the 99.9 percent of the female body that can be exposed on American network teleivison without eroding our morals. You know the parts I'm referring to, right?

1) The Forbidden Flesh, an area the approximate size of a cat's paw at the the front of the panties area.

2) The myserious Demon's Dots at the tip of each female breast. It used to be generally assumed that we American TV viewers could see all of the breast except for the actual nipples without damage to our children's moral values. Janet Jackson confused the issue by covering her nipples with decorative jewelry before flashing her SuperBowl half-time audience. In so doing, Jackson made us question whether covering the nipples might be just as bad as exposing them, if by covering them we make boys wonder what the nipples would look like naked.

It was the implication of nipples, and not the nipples themselves, that cost the Superbowl broadcasters an FCC fine and so terrified the commercial networks that the producers of ER edited a shot of a patient's breasts out of a breast-cancer episode.

Further confusing the matter, should your children be considering a future with the Federal Communications Commission, is the fact that CBS is broadcasting close-ups of breasts clad in little more than the wire frame that holds them up, a puff of nude-colored maribou feathers, and some glitter. Since the nipples are covered, just barely, aren't they implicity naked?

:confused:

Thought: children whose innocence was shattered by less than two seconds of Janet Jackson's implicitly exposed nipples are now two years older - many of them old enough to watch the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show with their dads. Meanwhile, their flat-chested pre-adolescent sisters cower in their bedrooms, plotting diet strategies and adding push-up bras to their Christmas wish lists.

A lot of girls will ask Santa for the Jason Timberlake song that opened tonight's fashion show. More likely to be disappointed are girls who wish for a pair of the lipstick-red latex thigh-high boots that were marching up the runway when Timberlake sang the line, "If you're bad I'll whip you."

:D

As for me, my Puritan DNA is now battling my inner porn fan for the TV remote. One of us wants to chastise sinners. The other wants to taunt that one, strip naked and run down the street in nothing but a smile and a pink feather boa.

I'm so confused!


But I like nipples.

:eek:
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
But I like nipples.

:eek:

Me too. So tasty and chewy.

Bet you can't eat just one. ;)

As to the topic of this thread, I'm so glad I don't watch TV.
 
rgraham666 said:
Me too. So tasty and chewy.

Bet you can't eat just one. ;)

As to the topic of this thread, I'm so glad I don't watch TV.

Oh, you'd have watched this fashion show my friend. You'd have liked it, too.

:devil:

A schizo highlight:

One model returns from the runway wearing what I can best describe as a minimalist teddie, consisting of an X-shaped strip of silver-y fabric about the width of some scotch tape, strategically covering her devil's triangle and nothing else.

A hand-held camera follows her essentially naked backside as she races backstage for a costume change. An indignant production assistant steps in front of the camera and snarls, "She's changing!"


:D


Isn't life fun?

Those boots, though. They were the cutest latex thigh-high boots ever!
 
rgraham666 said:
Me too. So tasty and chewy.

Bet you can't eat just one. ;)

As to the topic of this thread, I'm so glad I don't watch TV.

:cathappy:

(Do you have your passport yet, dear Rob? Or have you been too busy enjoying your authorship? :kiss: )
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
:cathappy:

(Do you have your passport yet, dear Rob? Or have you been too busy enjoying your authorship? :kiss: )

Not yet, sweetie. Photographers tomorrow. Guarantor probably next week. Passport at beginning of January. That means I should get it the middle of February.

I'm not sure I would have liked it, she. I find the marketing products that represent woman in the media as rather unattractive.
 
rgraham666 said:
Not yet, sweetie. Photographers tomorrow. Guarantor probably next week. Passport at beginning of January. That means I should get it the middle of February.

I'm not sure I would have liked it, she. I find the marketing products that represent woman in the media as rather unattractive.

Smile pretty for the photographers, Rob.

Many people are waiting to meet you in Chicago.

Hey, She - are you going to attend this Lit-together?

I am quite certain that none of Bush's minions will be there.

(I may send an invite to Clinton - he would enjoy this party.)

:cathappy:
 
Back
Top