It's a weird world

Mustang Sally

Wanna go for a ride?
Joined
Sep 21, 2000
Posts
3,511
My proofreading job is quite boring, but occasionally I do get to read some interesting judgments. Sometimes it feels like I'm peeking into the private lives of strangers. The greedy, the vengeful, the disgusting sides of people. Sometimes I shake my head and wonder at the sheer stupidity I'm reading.

Like the McDonald's case where a girl bit into a Big Mac only to discover a rat's head, complete with eyes, teeth and whiskers. I usually hear horror stories like this and think they're myths, urban legends, but this one is real and resulted in a lawsuit. The judge referred to another case in which the exact same thing had happened. Yikes! The theory is that an employee actually put the thing there. McD's food is soooo processed that the head couldn't have survived intact otherwise, right?

Like the landscaper who broke a bone in his foot and claimed it happened on the job due to the homeowner's negligence of property. The break started a long chain of complications that resulted in not one but TWO amputations on this guy's foot. The judge decided it couldn't possibly have happened the way the guy claimed and dismissed the case, exemplifying the attitude that "SOMEONE's going to pay for this."

Then there was the man who several times got his wife drunk to the point of passing out so he could rape her and videotape it. The wife discovered the tapes and sued him. The judge gave the husband an obligatory slap on the wrist, saying something like, "yeah, that's a little bit sick, but she would have consented if she'd been conscious, so no big deal."

That one pissed me off.
 
EEWWW about the McDonald's story. I am SO glad I don't eat there.

The landscaper is an idiot that needed his case thrown out. WFT??

The man and his wife - the judge needs to be taken out to a backwoods area reminiscent (sp) of Deliverance (the movie) where they can show him the difference between consent and non-consent. If she would have consented, why did he have to get her drunk first - DUH!!
 
::starts singing the theme from Deliverance::

Da da dum dum dum dum dum dum dummmm...
 
To clarify on that last one, the couple had a normal sex life otherwise, and apparently a pretty good marriage. That's why he said she would have consented had she been conscious. But she was unconscious! The opportunity to consent was taken away from her.
 
Mustang Sally said:
To clarify on that last one, the couple had a normal sex life otherwise, and apparently a pretty good marriage. That's why he said she would have consented had she been conscious. But she was unconscious! The opportunity to consent was taken away from her.


Did the marriage survive? and if it did, did he pay out of the joint account?
 
Samuari said:
Did the marriage survive? and if it did, did he pay out of the joint account?

The marriage did not survive. There was no monetary award for the wife. The husband had to do some mild, bullshit "house arrest" sentence. The divorce settlement would have been a whole other judgment. lol
 
As for the rape story, most states define rape as non-consentual, forced sex with a woman who is not the man's wife. It sounds like even if the judge thought the guy was sick, his hands were tied; no such thing as a husband raping his wife. Some states are attempting to amend this oversight, but it's still the law in most places. The most she could have recovered for would be battery (unwanted physical touch). Hence the wrist-slap.
 
Back
Top