It isn't real sex? I still need a cigarette

Brute_Force

Really Experienced
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Posts
214
The following is an intriguing article appearing in today's New York Times discussing real sex v. simulated sex in American cinema & television. I find it interesting because the Europeans have been making art house films with real sex for years. Why is sex in cinema still such a taboo in our country? I wonder....

Here's the article, for your consideration:


It Isn’t a Real Sex Scene? I Still Need a Cigarette
By MIREYA NAVARRO
Published: September 30, 2007
LOS ANGELES

A FEW years ago, Michelle Borth went topless for a movie, and she thought: “That’s it. That’s my last topless scene.”

Then she read the script for the new HBO show “Tell Me You Love Me.” The show required frontal nudity and such explicit sex scenes that the first question asked at a press conference with television critics last July was:

“Did anybody actually do it?”

The answer was no, but Ms. Borth, who plays Jamie in “Tell Me,” is not faulting anyone for wondering.

“It’s not supposed to be like any show,” Ms. Borth, 29, said. “To keep it tame doesn’t do justice to what we’re doing, which is an unfiltered, candid look at relationships, and that includes sex.”

Certainly, real sex in acting is rare, but recent offerings in television and film are pushing the boundaries. Some critics have called “Tell Me” nothing more than soft porn, and even people in the entertainment industry question just how much explicitness is necessary. Just how graphic, they ask, must sex scenes be to make a dramatic point?

In the last few years, two American filmmakers, Vincent Gallo and John Cameron Mitchell, have depicted actual sex in their films — and have not been shy about admitting it. Recently, the Oscar-winning director Ang Lee earned an NC-17 rating for his “Lust, Caution.”

These films and “Tell Me” fall under “hard-core art,” said Linda Williams, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of books on both pornography and cinema. They escalate the explicitness, trying to step beyond the conventional but not veer into pornography.

“We’re stuck in this dichotomy of pornography’s un-nuanced pleasure and simulated sex, which does not allow certain kinds of representations,” she said. The new productions, she added, are redefining “just what might be an American adult film or television show.”

Cynthia Mort, the creator of “Tell Me,” said the point was not to make the depiction indistinguishable from real sex. “The goal is to make it moving and emotional and intimate and, yes, uncomfortable at times, because not everyone is comfortable with sex,” she said. “You’re trying to capture that.”

IN the fourth episode of “Tell Me,” Ms. Borth’s character has a fling after breaking up with her fiancé. Rodrigo García, the director, said the scene needed explicitness, including nudity and frantic motion, to contrast with the aftermath — her disappointment and loneliness.

Otherwise, he said: “I’d have couples huffing and puffing under bedsheets. I don’t think a wife covers her breasts with bedsheets after sex. That’s an insufferable cliché in movies.”

Adam Scott, who plays the architect Palek on “Tell Me,” said he and his wife initially had reservations about the intimacy involved, but were won over by the script, which follows three couples as they work out relationship issues.

On the show, Mr. Scott is shown nude and engages in laborious sexual play as his character tries to get his wife, played by Sonya Walger, pregnant. He said the scenes needed to match the emotions portrayed in other aspects of the characters’ relationship, which frays under the strain of not being able to conceive.

“I feel the audience would be cheated if we say we’re doing a show about intimacy, and it’s not intimate,” Mr. Scott said.

But judging from comments on the show’s Web site, viewers are split. While some appreciate the scenes (“The scenes really get you to a true place,” one viewer wrote), others find them distracting and unnecessary.

Another viewer wrote: “I can understand having examples of problems for people to deal with, but you don’t need to show a full sex scene between two people. It’s like a second generation Playboy channel.”

Some film historians question whether audiences really lose out if there is more modesty.

“I’m not sure the general audience cares as much as filmmakers do in terms of how graphically it’s shot,” said Patricia King Hanson, editor of the American Film Institute’s catalog of feature films. “If you have kissing and partial nudity, is that less effective than if you showed them copulating on screen?”

Some actors agree that some territory shouldn’t be explored for the sake of a film or a show.

Ashley Jones, 30, an actress on the soap opera “The Bold and the Beautiful,” often acts in scenes requiring vigorous pretending, but she said she balked at anything racier in her acting career. “To me, you can get the same message across and leave something to the imagination,” she said. “When you get out there suddenly you feel too exposed, and you think, ‘This doesn’t feel like I’m an actor. This feels like I’m doing it.’”

What then, of the actors who are willing to go all the way? While real sex in film dates back to the 1970s and is a mainstay of European directors like Catherine Breillat of France, Lisa Ades, a director of “Indie Sex,” a documentary series on sex in cinema shown last month on IFC, said American directors have only recently ventured into it, with Mr. Gallo’s 2003 movie “The Brown Bunny” and last year’s “Shortbus,” written and directed by Mr. Mitchell.

Mr. Gallo declined a request for an interview and Mr. Mitchell was in Europe and unavailable. But one of the leads in “Shortbus,” Paul Dawson, 37, compared his experience with the sex scenes to shedding tears.

“A crying scene and a sex scene are very intimate and require an actor to find something inside that makes him cry or makes him aroused,” he said. Mr. Dawson said he did “Shortbus” because he saw value in creating something that viewers might not have seen on screen but that many would identify with.

Even so, a lot of people in the industry don’t buy the idea that some films require actors to engage in the real thing. Scott Winant, a director of the Showtime series “Californication,” which also uses sex as a narrative device, said that what makes the scene is the emotions conveyed in the acting, not the act. Real sex, he said, “doesn’t necessarily communicate the emotion of the sexual moment. It’s more effective to work with great actors who can identify with a sexual moment through the acting.”

To viewers, these distinctions may be hard to grasp. Even Marci Hirsch, a vice president at Vivid Entertainment, an adult film company, said “Tell Me” often looked like the soft version of her films. “I said, ‘Did I just see that?’” she said. “I didn’t think the sex scenes were bad at all.”
 
Well, are they actors or not? :)

Movies about murders don't involve true crime, movies about medical issues don't contain true doctors or medicines, I've read about how an actor will yank out a nose hair to help stimulate tears for a sad scene . . .

If they are playing a role with a script and a set - why on earth would the sex need to be real? Honestly. Everything else is fake.

It seems to be a way to garner publicity and boost viewers. It isn't to improve the final product.

Edited to add: Hey, I'm all for sex! Just not in this context.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Johnny Depp, Mr. sex-on-two-legs, is oddly prudish. He worked with Christina Ricci, in a movie called "The Man Who Cried" and had several sex scenes with her. He sees her as his baby sister, and is NOT that kind of perv. He called their scenes "Rutting like pigs."

But you'd never know it looking at the film-- beautiful, passionate, needy. Just the way I like it. :rose:
 
BRUTE FORCE

Maybe the boys dont respond as they oughta. Someone I know makes porno films. According to her, things are not done in one 'take.' And the guys need to figure on staying up a while. Plus people goose you with microphones and camera lenses.
 
Stella_Omega said:
Johnny Depp, Mr. sex-on-two-legs, is oddly prudish. He worked with Christina Ricci, in a movie called "The Man Who Cried" and had several sex scenes with her. He sees her as his baby sister, and is NOT that kind of perv. He called their scenes "Rutting like pigs."

But you'd never know it looking at the film-- beautiful, passionate, needy. Just the way I like it. :rose:

That is a very interesting film. The sex scenes are as well.
 
JAMESBJOHNSON said:
BRUTE FORCE

Maybe the boys dont respond as they oughta. Someone I know makes porno films. According to her, things are not done in one 'take.' And the guys need to figure on staying up a while. Plus people goose you with microphones and camera lenses.
*goosing you with a microphone and running away*

*hears a large juicy fart from a long distance away*

hmm musta got stuck
 
Noor said:
That is a very interesting film. The sex scenes are as well.
Yes, it's a really good example of how sex scenes can be seamless part of a story. They move the plot along, every time.

It's European, come to think of it... :rolleyes:
 
A fascinating French film that falls into the "shock cinema" genre is Baise Moi. In the film, two veterans of the French adult film industry, Karen Bach and Rafaella Anderson, play prostitutes who go on a cross-country rampage in which they seduce and kill everyone along the way. Yes, it's violent. Yes, it's hardcore. But, it really does some interesting things with the concept of "reality" in film. The sex scenes are for real, not simulated. And, they drive the movie forward in ways you wouldn't imagine possible. It was named one of the top 10 European films of 2000 and won the best film awards at the Toronto international Film Festival, Seattle International Film Festival, and San Francisco International Film Festival. It's worth viewing if you wanna see how sex can actually be used to produce reality and meaning in a film.
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
Well, are they actors or not? :)

Movies about murders don't involve true crime, movies about medical issues don't contain true doctors or medicines, I've read about how an actor will yank out a nose hair to help stimulate tears for a sad scene . . .

If they are playing a role with a script and a set - why on earth would the sex need to be real? Honestly. Everything else is fake.

It seems to be a way to garner publicity and boost viewers. It isn't to improve the final product.

Edited to add: Hey, I'm all for sex! Just not in this context.

Well said Sarahh. Actors act, don't they?
 
MS. READ

I was goosed by a Yorkie, on one occasion. There's nothing quitew compares to a cold, wet nose right on your anal sphincter.
 
Back
Top