islam is evil

[DanOkeffie]

we must fix it and them

 

[RoryN]

Okay: time to guess the alt!

oh Roybie, so sad. his only discovery in life was literotica

Below are the only other members to ever refer to me by that word. Worth noting that they were (are) utterly infatuated with me:

thanks roybie

clearly Roybie and SeanR enjoy cock sauce

it must suck to be Roybie

 

[JohnEngelman]

There are things I appreciate about Islam. Nevertheless, the Koran recommends violence as a way of spreading the faith. Christians have used violence to spread Christianity from time to time. Nevertheless, nothing in the New Testament says that it is acceptable to use violence to spread Christianity.

 

[AnomalyLady]

There are things I appreciate about Islam. Nevertheless, the Koran recommends violence as a way of spreading the faith. Christians have used violence to spread Christianity from time to time. Nevertheless, nothing in the New Testament says that it is acceptable to use violence to spread Christianity.

Have you read the Quran?

 

[ll74]

Every religion is exactly what believers make it. Interpretation based on bullshit to establish values.

Evil is a religious construct to make people who do heinous things seen inhuman. Sadly, all human beings are capable of the same level of heinous behavior....the word evil just makes people feel like it's beyond their capabilities.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Have you read the Quran?

Yes, in three different English translations.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Yes, in three different English translations.

i study and respect each of the world's great religions. I attend an Anglican church. I am also attracted to Judaism and Buddhism.

 

[DraggonStone]

There are things I appreciate about Islam. Nevertheless, the Koran recommends violence as a way of spreading the faith. Christians have used violence to spread Christianity from time to time. Nevertheless, nothing in the New Testament says that it is acceptable to use violence to spread Christianity.

Do you believe that alleged Christians only practice what they learn from the New Testament?

 

[JohnEngelman]

Do you believe that alleged Christians only practice what they learn from the New Testament?

No.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

i study and respect each of the world's great religions. I attend an Anglican church. I am also attracted to Judaism and Buddhism.

Fag.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Okay: time to guess the alt!



Below are the only other members to ever refer to me by that word. Worth noting that they were (are) utterly infatuated with me:

Rorythesnitch pulling out the spreadsheets.

 

[ll74]

Rorythesnitch pulling out the spreadsheets.

Wat pulled his from earlier. Maybe you should join in with yours.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Fag.

How does that follow?

 

[Bray123]

Deuteronomy 25:19

Therefore it shall be, when the LORD thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it.

Old Testament, telling you to exterminate the peoples living in Palestine so that the Jews could steal their land. So much hatred.

 

[OralAllOver]

In WW1 chlorine, mustard and phosgene gases (and others) were used, and, yes, had their uses

Arguing about which is "worst" is silly to point of delusional

So it is EXACTLY with these religions ... relics of a genocidal past

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Gents, we must understand that judging individuals based solely on their religious beliefs is fundamentally unfair because faith is deeply personal, often inherited, and forms a core part of an individual's identity, worldview, and sense of community. To condemn a person for their belief system is to overlook their individual character, actions, and capacity for good. It's a form of prejudice that reduces a complex human being to a mere label.
Furthermore, it is a fallacy to label any entire religion as 'evil'. All major global religions are, at their foundation, systems of morality, compassion, and guidance, seeking to cultivate positive values like kindness, love, and community cohesion. When atrocities or acts of discrimination occur, they are nearly always the result of extremism, political manipulation, or the actions of individuals misinterpreting or wilfully distorting sacred texts for their own ends. The problem lies with the radicalised application, not the intrinsic faith itself. Therefore, let us judge people by their deeds, not by the tradition they follow.
Please note that I did not make a point in the discussion above that the 'invention' of 'evil' is a Christian doing. It was invented by a Roman guy called Plutin who stated that every existing thing must have an opposite. Where there's light there must be darkness. Which is fucking bullshit to phrase it nicely.

 

[Bray123]

The Old Testament spells out exactly whose land this is, and the Quran itself names the sons of Israel and their promised land more than a hundred times--- never once Palestine or Palestinians. True Muslims know exactly who God gave this land to.

The Arab world stretches across some 14.5 million square kilometers, yet they force the so-called “Palestinians” to cling to a few measly scraps in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. All across the world, a fourth generation of them still holds refugee status and draws full subsidies from the UN---something unheard of in history. The "Palestinians" were created ad hoc in 1917 to block the birth of the Jewish state and have been preserved ever since only as a perpetual weapon against it.

Since Israel’s full withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, effectively allowing them to form a de facto state, the Egyptians, with whom they share a border, have supplied them with plentiful arms but have prevented Gazans who wish to leave from doing so. No one is willing to accept them.

October 7th woke Israel up. Now it fights not only for itself, but for the whole world, against the forces of evil, against humanity’s greatest existential threat.

Absolute fucking nonsense, trying to justify murdering an entire people.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Murdering people is just murdering people.
Genocide is too much of a compliment there

 

[OralAllOver]

The real genocide happened on October 7 when civilians were raped, mutilated, and beheaded; children were burned alive before their parents’ eyes, and babies were thrown into ovens or hanged on clotheslines. Anyone who supports the perpetrators of these horrors is an accomplice to pure evil and a sworn enemy of humanity.

That means Trump
He supports Qatar (one of his paymasters)
And Qatar supports Hamas

Trump supports many murderous assholes

 

[Bray123]

The real genocide happened on October 7 when civilians were raped, mutilated, and beheaded; children were burned alive before their parents’ eyes, and babies were thrown into ovens or hanged on clotheslines. Anyone who supports the perpetrators of these horrors is an accomplice to pure evil and a sworn enemy of humanity.

Absolute fucking nonsense.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

True. On one hand, he fights institutionalized antisemitism in universities; on the other, he lets billions in Qatari donations that fuel it flow freely. People have already forgotten 9/11. Trump embraces Syria’s current leader, a former Al-Qaeda figure, a suit-wearing terrorist who slaughters Druze, Alawites, and Christians.

Americans probably won’t wake up until another 9/11 strikes. Qatar bankrolls the malignant cancer of the Muslim Brotherhood worldwide---literally the most dangerous country on Earth, and Trump drools over the Boeing they promised him.

No, he doesn't fight anti-Semitism. He fights universities and that's his excuse
No, Syria's current leader isn't Al-Qaida and never was. Mohammed al-Baschir was member of Hayat Tahrir al-Scham, islamic rebels against Assad.

But you are right, the US and everything they stand for is under attack by a group of viscous semi religious nutcases called 'Trump Administration'

 

[LeahWill]

No, he doesn't fight anti-Semitism. He fights universities and that's his excuse
No, Syria's current leader isn't Al-Qaida and never was. Mohammed al-Baschir was member of Hayat Tahrir al-Scham, islamic rebels against Assad.

But you are right, the US and everything they stand for is under attack by a group of viscous semi religious nutcases called 'Trump Administration'

Isn't 'semi-religious' akin to being 'a little bit pregnant'?

 

[LeahWill]

I wouldn't expect accomplices of pure evil, sworn enemies of humanity, to care about objective truth.

You can't fix sheer evil when it's rooted that deep in a culture. Not with words. You crush it with the same ferocity and brutality it uses to spread.

Like we did with the IRA you mean?

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Isn't 'semi-religious' akin to being 'a little bit pregnant'?

Semi means they pretend to be for their followers.

 

[LeahWill]

The IRA never dreamed of conquering the world, slaughtering infidels, and imposing Sharia law. Nothing comes close to what those bloodthirsty maniacs are capable of and planning.

"Arabs love their murder hot, moist, and steaming, and if they ever have the freedom to fulfill themselves, we will miss the good, sterile gases of the Germans." -- a 1980s Hebrew poet eerily predicted the horrors of October 7.

I'll take that as a 'no' then.

IRA were 'terrorist light' or 'semi-skinned terrorists' if you prefer, who by merely wanting to drive the British and their supporters out of Ireland showed a lack of commitment and ambition. Gotcha. We should let their victims families know how lucky they were. (1,800 killed by them apparently. Lightweights).

But just out of interest how do you 'fix' an idea? I mean you could (I suppose) kill everyone who currently has that 'idea / commitment' and also all those who you worry might not have that ambition right now but may pick it up once they have witnessed their family and friends being massacred. (There is actually a word for describing doing that).

But then what? What about random people who read about them in a book. See a film. Hear a song. read a poem?

How do you plan to identify and 'fix' them so the idea doesn't just keep being 're-born' in future generations?

And isn't your goal a "[dream] of conquering the world, slaughtering 'infidels', and imposing [Christian / USA / white] law?

In which case then surely your aim is to surpass "what those bloodthirsty maniacs are capable of and planning" in the 'more acceptable' name of all that is right, noble and fair. As you decide it to be.

Which is just the same as the attitude of the 'arab' you profess to be 'better' than. More 'civilised' than.

(By the way, don't know who it was but they sound like a rubbish poet. But if a poet said it I guess it must be what all 'arabs' think...).