G
Is this physically possible? (Kinda technical question...)
- Thread starter sheath
- Start date
cuervorose
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2002
- Posts
- 366
As told by an ob/gyn...
I'll admit I may be wrong, but if a woman isn't dilating (during labor), a substance containg prostiglandins (sp???) can be applied to her cervical opening. The substance used is most often derived from pig semen. Human semen contains the same thing. After being told this by my ob, I researched it and found that it's actually more effective if taken orally.... I.O.W, "swallowing" during the latter stages of pregnancy can start to dilate the cervix...
needless to say, my husband was encouraged by this news..
I'll admit I may be wrong, but if a woman isn't dilating (during labor), a substance containg prostiglandins (sp???) can be applied to her cervical opening. The substance used is most often derived from pig semen. Human semen contains the same thing. After being told this by my ob, I researched it and found that it's actually more effective if taken orally.... I.O.W, "swallowing" during the latter stages of pregnancy can start to dilate the cervix...
needless to say, my husband was encouraged by this news..
WARNING
I wanted to add my 2¢ - which is a warning for the TYPE of orgasms you are having or trying to have.
Clitoral orgasms are known to produce a sucking / grabbing motion by the cevix. This is relatively safe during pregancy. A GSpot orgasm on the other hand produces a pushing / expelling motion. It is also known to produce significantly larger doses of oxytocin which may contribute to continued spasms or muscle contractions after sex has stopped.
I was just reading through some of the posts on this topic and wanted to, again, warn people who are pregnant that GSpot orgasms have their time and place and are GREAT but please NOT WHEN YOU ARE PREGNANT.
I wanted to add my 2¢ - which is a warning for the TYPE of orgasms you are having or trying to have.
Clitoral orgasms are known to produce a sucking / grabbing motion by the cevix. This is relatively safe during pregancy. A GSpot orgasm on the other hand produces a pushing / expelling motion. It is also known to produce significantly larger doses of oxytocin which may contribute to continued spasms or muscle contractions after sex has stopped.
I was just reading through some of the posts on this topic and wanted to, again, warn people who are pregnant that GSpot orgasms have their time and place and are GREAT but please NOT WHEN YOU ARE PREGNANT.
SlickTony
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 25, 2002
- Posts
- 6,344
I wish I'd have known about that--about the G-spot orgasm and pregnancy. My son was a week late. In the last week I was instigating sex just about every night not merely for its own good sake, but because I was hoping that the contractions of orgasm would help bring on labor. But the orgasms I got weren't specifically G-spot orgasms. And now this info is of no more use to me, as I will not be getting pregnant again. I guess I'll just have to pass it on to someone else.
I had a lover that was just exactly the right length to slam exuberantly into me and graze my cervix and I just loved it. However, my husband wouldn't be able to do that because it would hurt.
Kathleencd
Experienced
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2002
- Posts
- 30
Is this physically possible?
I'm just a guy in a dress but I'm an RN. Yours is a question that most women seem afraid to ask their doctor. In nursing school I was really amazed that most the girls. Didn't know anything about their bodies. When I talked with mother I found out she didn't know alot about her body either.
To be honest, most men are ignorant about their bodies too.
This reply doesn't answer your original question but most of members gave you the right answer.
Like I said in 63: If men could get pregnant, abortion wouldn't be an issue.
I'm just a guy in a dress but I'm an RN. Yours is a question that most women seem afraid to ask their doctor. In nursing school I was really amazed that most the girls. Didn't know anything about their bodies. When I talked with mother I found out she didn't know alot about her body either.
To be honest, most men are ignorant about their bodies too.
This reply doesn't answer your original question but most of members gave you the right answer.
Like I said in 63: If men could get pregnant, abortion wouldn't be an issue.
comeagain4
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2003
- Posts
- 17
funny thing about medical journals is that in a lot of instances they are not correct.
from a pratical standpoint the cervix can be penetrated depending upon the man's legnth and the womans as well and upon the positioning of the cervix. the legnth of a womans vaganial tunnel varries between woman. additionally it seems to become longer after childbirth in most women. what the latter means is that in manny instances after several children if the man is of average legnth it can be out of his reach.
if your man can reach your cervix and it is positioned properly it can be penetrated, but it is not something that is done quickly. the cervix is a spincher muscle, if all conditions are right, slow steady preasure against it can cause it to dilate sufficiently enough for the man to actually enter the womans womb. if this is done carefully there will not be any soreness or bleading, but it takes a lot of patience especially the first time. even after the woman gets used to the penetration, it still takes patience even after years of usage/practice.
my deceased wife was a small woman, and we had to learn how to deal with that problem otherwise it could mean my bouncing off the bottom which did cause her considerable pain. according to her, after we figured it out, once i got thru she had considerable enjoyment from the deep movement. also she said that when i went off that it was like i was spraypainting her entire insides much more so than before we learned how to deal with the issue.
several GF's after her death just decided the best way to deal with me was to keep their legs relativly close together. that way i could not cause them harm as the penetration is much shallower when the mans legs are outside the womans in the missionary position. funny thing about this is that the woman gets a lot more clitorial stimulation from this slight difference in position.
as to the pregnancy issues can not speek to those except as dealing with livestock and that from the standpoint that we could not afford a vet so i delivered our lambs. from what i have read and been told by vets female sheep are about the same size as women in the plumbing. failure of cervical dilation is very commonplace whenever there was a abnormal presentation. whenever that happened i had to do manual dilation getting my hand past the cervix to be able to turn the lamb. did a lot of them over the years (usually 50 to 60 per year) and never was up inside of a ewe where a finger would not easily slip through the cercix to start the manual dilation process.
talk about giving a man a complex. think about having your arm in to the elboe in the same size plumbing as most women are equiped with.
from a pratical standpoint the cervix can be penetrated depending upon the man's legnth and the womans as well and upon the positioning of the cervix. the legnth of a womans vaganial tunnel varries between woman. additionally it seems to become longer after childbirth in most women. what the latter means is that in manny instances after several children if the man is of average legnth it can be out of his reach.
if your man can reach your cervix and it is positioned properly it can be penetrated, but it is not something that is done quickly. the cervix is a spincher muscle, if all conditions are right, slow steady preasure against it can cause it to dilate sufficiently enough for the man to actually enter the womans womb. if this is done carefully there will not be any soreness or bleading, but it takes a lot of patience especially the first time. even after the woman gets used to the penetration, it still takes patience even after years of usage/practice.
my deceased wife was a small woman, and we had to learn how to deal with that problem otherwise it could mean my bouncing off the bottom which did cause her considerable pain. according to her, after we figured it out, once i got thru she had considerable enjoyment from the deep movement. also she said that when i went off that it was like i was spraypainting her entire insides much more so than before we learned how to deal with the issue.
several GF's after her death just decided the best way to deal with me was to keep their legs relativly close together. that way i could not cause them harm as the penetration is much shallower when the mans legs are outside the womans in the missionary position. funny thing about this is that the woman gets a lot more clitorial stimulation from this slight difference in position.
as to the pregnancy issues can not speek to those except as dealing with livestock and that from the standpoint that we could not afford a vet so i delivered our lambs. from what i have read and been told by vets female sheep are about the same size as women in the plumbing. failure of cervical dilation is very commonplace whenever there was a abnormal presentation. whenever that happened i had to do manual dilation getting my hand past the cervix to be able to turn the lamb. did a lot of them over the years (usually 50 to 60 per year) and never was up inside of a ewe where a finger would not easily slip through the cercix to start the manual dilation process.
talk about giving a man a complex. think about having your arm in to the elboe in the same size plumbing as most women are equiped with.
SlickTony
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 25, 2002
- Posts
- 6,344
How interesting! In all those accounts that James Herriot gave of having his arm up to the elbow and past (cows and horses) he didn't bother to mention that. Ya learn something every day. This has to be true of people as well.
You didn't mention, comeagain, if y'all two had any kids. If you did, I guess your interesting practice didn't lead to cervical incompetence.
Last edited:
comeagain4
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2003
- Posts
- 17
Slick Tony
in response to your question we had 3 sons. during the first several years she had several miscarriages. whether what we were doing had anything to do with the miscarriages, i do not know, but after the 1st boy was born she did not have anymore misscarriages so i do not think that what we did in bed had anything to do with the miscarriages.
further she swelled up fast. and she told me when we had to change depths because of the pregnancies. me i am just a poor dumb man. at least that is what i have always been told. hehe
in response to your question we had 3 sons. during the first several years she had several miscarriages. whether what we were doing had anything to do with the miscarriages, i do not know, but after the 1st boy was born she did not have anymore misscarriages so i do not think that what we did in bed had anything to do with the miscarriages.
further she swelled up fast. and she told me when we had to change depths because of the pregnancies. me i am just a poor dumb man. at least that is what i have always been told. hehe
An answer from an OB/GYN!!!!
It's interesting that you just posted this. I heard back from my ob/gyn in response to this question, and here is what she said, which pretty much echoes what YOU said. This is all paraphrased, of course. So if anything seems off, it is my fault, not her information. Got it? Good.
First, she told me that no one had ever asked her that question, and when she brought it up with her colleagues, none of them had heard it asked either. (That absolutely amazed me...but I digress...) She said it sparked a really heated discussion, but here is what they finally agreed upon:
She said it is TECHNICALLY possible. But it is not likely. Several factors would have to come together to make it happen, such as a short vaginal canal and a man who can reach the cervix. The cervix would have to be in the correct position, and she said THAT is actually more common in women who have already had more than one child, for the cervix can "drop" with each subsequent pregnancy, and become more pliable. She said that the cervix would probably have to be slightly open to begin with to allow penetration to happen.
She said that it would likely involve at least moderate pain, and some bleeding, and that the practice would definitely be unsafe during pregnancy. She said that most women's bodies wouldn't allow it to happen, simply for the sheer pain it could cause.
She went ON to tell me that in medieval times, forced dilation was sometimes used as a form of torture? (I did NOT ask her to elaborate on that one!)
And of course, she went on to tell me to come in and get checkout if it happens again, just in case, like the good doctor she is.
So, that was her expert, professional opinion...but she did admit that she wasn't entirely sure it could happen. But that is was TECHNICALLY possible, given all factors being correct.
What do you guys think?
S.
comeagain4 said:
It's interesting that you just posted this. I heard back from my ob/gyn in response to this question, and here is what she said, which pretty much echoes what YOU said. This is all paraphrased, of course. So if anything seems off, it is my fault, not her information. Got it? Good.
First, she told me that no one had ever asked her that question, and when she brought it up with her colleagues, none of them had heard it asked either. (That absolutely amazed me...but I digress...) She said it sparked a really heated discussion, but here is what they finally agreed upon:
She said it is TECHNICALLY possible. But it is not likely. Several factors would have to come together to make it happen, such as a short vaginal canal and a man who can reach the cervix. The cervix would have to be in the correct position, and she said THAT is actually more common in women who have already had more than one child, for the cervix can "drop" with each subsequent pregnancy, and become more pliable. She said that the cervix would probably have to be slightly open to begin with to allow penetration to happen.
She said that it would likely involve at least moderate pain, and some bleeding, and that the practice would definitely be unsafe during pregnancy. She said that most women's bodies wouldn't allow it to happen, simply for the sheer pain it could cause.
She went ON to tell me that in medieval times, forced dilation was sometimes used as a form of torture?
(I did NOT ask her to elaborate on that one!)And of course, she went on to tell me to come in and get checkout if it happens again, just in case, like the good doctor she is.
So, that was her expert, professional opinion...but she did admit that she wasn't entirely sure it could happen. But that is was TECHNICALLY possible, given all factors being correct.
What do you guys think?
S.
comeagain4
Virgin
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2003
- Posts
- 17
sheath
your good doctor is wrong on the point re pain and bleeding if all other factors are in place and you go at it right.
of course if you use her analagy anal intercourse would be painfull and would cause bleeding. while i am not into that practice i guess that if the man just bulls ahead and does not use any lube then anal intercourse would be painfull and cause bleeding.
both muscles are of the same type(spincher) and serve similar functions. the trick though is a slow and steady process. also the cervix will be easier to penetrate more quickly, relatively speaking, with repeated penetration.
your good doctor is wrong on the point re pain and bleeding if all other factors are in place and you go at it right.
of course if you use her analagy anal intercourse would be painfull and would cause bleeding. while i am not into that practice i guess that if the man just bulls ahead and does not use any lube then anal intercourse would be painfull and cause bleeding.
both muscles are of the same type(spincher) and serve similar functions. the trick though is a slow and steady process. also the cervix will be easier to penetrate more quickly, relatively speaking, with repeated penetration.
