Is this okay?

[chimicawriting]

Hi.

New here ; long time reader and been writing for 11 years as a ghostwriter.

I want to try something new; a niche that is a challenge because it's 100% different than anything I've ever done before. It's called dino erotica .

Could I publish this topic here? What category would you think it would fit into? I was thinking fetish / non human?

 

[Handley_Page]

Hi.

New here ; long time reader and been writing for 11 years as a ghostwriter.

I want to try something new; a niche that is a challenge because it's 100% different than anything I've ever done before. It's called dino erotica .

Could I publish this topic here? What category would you think it would fit into? I was thinking fetish / non human?

You mean something about Terry the T-Rex and his girlfriend Brenda the Brontosaurus?

 

[oggbashan]

From Wikipedia:

Dinosaur erotica, part of the larger genre of monster erotica, is a subgenre of erotic literature that involves sexual encounters between humans and dinosaurs. Works include titles such as Taken by the T-Rex, Ravished by Triceratops and A Billionaire Dinosaur Forced Me Gay. Despite their cheesiness ("the Kardashian of crappy erotica") the genre's titles have achieved high sales ranks and significant media interest.

I think it would fit in the Non-Human or Sci Fi/Fantasy categories.

Assuming all dinosaurs are over 18 years old, of course!

 

[chimicawriting]

Not sure of dinos name yet! But kinda only with a human girlfrend..

Awesome ; non human and sci fi... can't wait to start plotting!

 

[Bramblethorn]

Not sure of dinos name yet! But kinda only with a human girlfrend..

Awesome ; non human and sci fi... can't wait to start plotting!

That may violate Lit's "no bestiality" rule. Might be an idea to run it by Laurel before you invest a lot of effort into it.

 

[HandsInTheDark]

That may violate Lit's "no bestiality" rule. Might be an idea to run it by Laurel before you invest a lot of effort into it.

Unicorns and elves are apparently ok. Is the rule such that only mythical creatures are ok? Or only existent creatures (in which case dinosaurs are ok because none are left?)

I only bring it up because I'm fascinated by edge cases and fuzzy definitions in rules. I've already established that a character that looks 16 but isn't will not pass muster. What about a dinosaur that closely resembles a modern day monitor lizard?

Endless hairsplitting is possible. What happens when scientists start mixing human DNA with non-human DNA and getting viable life? It's not remotely legal now, but someday it is going to happen anyway. What will Literotica look like in fifty years?

A twisted plot bunny, submitted for your consideration. Welcome to the twilight zone.

 

[SikFuk]

I had a story rejected because, in a scene depicting a virtual reality simulation, a grown up Jessica Alba has a sexual encounter with a dolphin. This is virtual reality - a computer simulation - not a real life depiction. I had to rewrite it so the VR simulation was so low budget, they couldn't use a real dolphin, they had to use a man in a dolphin suit to do the VR simulation modeling. After the rewrite, the story got posted in an Earth Day contest years ago. It's called "The Browning of America", if anyone is in the mood for a futuristic satire on environmental destruction resulting from unregulated free market capitalism. ...Yeah, it didn't score very well.

 

[HandsInTheDark]

I had a story rejected because, in a scene depicting a virtual reality simulation, a grown up Jessica Alba has a sexual encounter with a dolphin. This is virtual reality

The rule of thumb I've come up with is, if a scene suggests a rule violation - even if it's not breaking the rule - it will be rejected. Sex with a virtual dolphin suggests sex with a real one. Bad. I had a story in which a succubus posed as a slightly too young girl. You find out by the end of the story that it was in fact a succubus (and well over permissible age) - but rejected. Appearance is all that matters, even if later in the story the misapprehension is (messily) resolved.

I don't know whether it's because Laurel has to read very fast and just misses things; or whether the rule is simply "not even a suggestion of....". Probably the latter.

It's pretty clearly not an appeal to ethics that drives this. Not on a site where incest and non-consent don't raise eyebrows. (And not in a world where sex clearly and very commonly happens before 18). My guess is fear of 2 things - one, legal issues; US law at least is overly restrictive and unevenly enforced, a minefield for a small business. Two, a look at what goes on at sites where anything goes. Parts of Lit look positively dignified in comparison to other sites.

At the end of the day it doesn't matter. Laurel does as Laurel does, and the guiding principle is probably "what's good for the website." The site's still here so she clearly does ok.

 

[chimicawriting]

Thank you all for this helpful advice and input. It means a lot to me when I'm just starting to publish my goodies here. I might just contact the admin and ask directly. With luck it will be on good. Thank you again.

 

[Hypoxia]

In my BRIDE OF KONG series (1 2 3 4) there's non-controversial sex between humans and Kong-human hybrids with human speech. No problem. The speaking gene-spliced Kong clones were clearly not natural animals, and the more humanoid hybrids, even though speed-grown and early-matured, were over 18. I'll suggest that if your dinosaurs are clearly sentient, unnatural, fantasy critters, they'll be OK here. At least they're not unicorns.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Unicorns and elves are apparently ok. Is the rule such that only mythical creatures are ok?

Yep. By my understanding the dividing line is drawn based on real vs fictional creatures, but I'm not absolutely certain where real-but-extinct fits in.

Endless hairsplitting is possible. What happens when scientists start mixing human DNA with non-human DNA and getting viable life? It's not remotely legal now, but someday it is going to happen anyway.

That's pretty much what HeLa is, although it wasn't created deliberately.

I'd say "and not really Literotica fodder" except that I used it in my most recent EH story...

 

[Messier82]

Unicorns and elves are apparently ok. Is the rule such that only mythical creatures are ok? Or only existent creatures (in which case dinosaurs are ok because none are left?)

I only bring it up because I'm fascinated by edge cases and fuzzy definitions in rules. I've already established that a character that looks 16 but isn't will not pass muster. What about a dinosaur that closely resembles a modern day monitor lizard?

Added just because I'm a (former) scientist who is keen on paleontology: the closest thing we have today to the dinosaurs would be the birds, not other reptiles. Birds can be rightly considered as flying Therapod dinosaurs. Most paleontologists now believe that many dinosaurs, especially those of the Cretaceous Period, had feathers of some kind, most likely as secondary sexual characteristics.
An honourable mention goes to the New Zealand lizard Tuatara which has skeletal features which link it with the dinosaurs, even if only tenuously.

On the subject of Dino Erotica, it would vex me enormously if it involved sex between humans and dinos, purely for the fact that, despite what old-time Hollywood has led people to think, humans and dinosaurs were separated by 65 million years

I suppose you could go down the path of a Jurassic Porn story

 

[Hypoxia]

On the subject of Dino Erotica, it would vex me enormously if it involved sex between humans and dinos, purely for the fact that, despite what old-time Hollywood has led people to think, humans and dinosaurs were separated by 65 million years

I suppose you could go down the path of a Jurassic Porn story

That would be the way. Nefarious researchers (like the firm led by the guy who is not quite Dicky Attenborough in my BRIDE OF KONG tales) breed ancient saurian DNA but find a need to include human alleles in the chromosomal mix. Thus the nuvo dinos have human intelligence, speech, and sexual drives. They must be good fucks.

 

[Messier82]

Yeah, but you'd probably want to avoid any back-scratching-in-the-throes-of-passion occurences, especially with a velociraptor-hybrid

 

[jaF0]

Endless hairsplitting is possible. What happens when scientists start mixing human DNA with non-human DNA and getting viable life? It's not remotely legal now, but someday it is going to happen anyway. What will Literotica look like in fifty years?

Dr. Moreau I presume?

 

[Hypoxia]

Dr. Moreau I presume?

Yes, a remote colony of hypersexualized human-beast clone-hybrids of various intelligence, all merrily fucking away with no worries because they're mutually sterile. I've seen comix on that theme. Don't forget the cat-girl with ten tits, two more than normal -- hey, she's genetically enhanced! And OctoPrickMan with... you guessed it, many nicely formed tentacles and testicles. And a sophisticated, sleek, elegant T-Rex woman with well-trimmed claws and a toothy smile. But then there's that idiot Chihuahua-Man, all dick and no brain, just like the whippets Mom used to breed...

 

[jaF0]

" And OctoPrickMan with... you guessed it, many "

Did you ever watch Babylon 5? Molari? For some reason, even on broadcast TV, they made it known he had more than one.

 

[Hypoxia]

" And OctoPrickMan with... you guessed it, many "

Did you ever watch Babylon 5? Molari? For some reason, even on broadcast TV, they made it known he had more than one.

Nope, I missed Bab5. Odo on ST:TNG could have extruded as many as he desired. Could have formed many lacunae too. A regular sex machine there.

 

[HandsInTheDark]

" And OctoPrickMan with... you guessed it, many "

Did you ever watch Babylon 5? Molari? For some reason, even on broadcast TV, they made it known he had more than one.

I have always suspected that that was an attempt to impose artistic copyrights on character likenesses. Molari was more or less human in appearance, so there's no good legal limitations on making toys that look like him. The other alien characters had discernable non-human appearance that artists came up with, and so their likenesses were protected property. So they came up with a created trait for Molari as well. It's vaguely the same rationale as for putting a tattoo on a porn star.

I think this mostly because the episode they introduced it in was really pretty weak for B5 and they never did anything else with the idea; but the episode did mention toy figures.

 

[chimicawriting]

It seems like there is a massive debt on if it's even worthy of writing. Which is interesting and not something I expected at all.

Have any of you read the dino erotica found on Kindle? Some are better than others and have a different idea on how they combine humans with the dinos. One I've read , had the humans 65 million years ago ... another had them hidden under ground hiding from humans. But there are many options. I know of one where a time machine was used.

I would have assumed it'd be okay since there are unicorn porn and elf porn and other animal porn right? But maybe it's not for literotica. Maybe I'll stick with gay and lesbian erotica instead.

Thanks for all your input.

 

[Hypoxia]

Have any of you read the dino erotica found on Kindle?

Not yet; I don't Kindle. Damn, guess I'll have to gargle for dino pr0n.

I would have assumed it'd be okay since there are unicorn porn and elf porn and other animal porn right? But maybe it's not for literotica. Maybe I'll stick with gay and lesbian erotica instead.

Well, there's always GLBT dino pr0n. But unicorns and elves aren't real animals, so they're okay here. Write about sentient talking fantasy dinos and they'll be okay too. If they're old enough.

 

[NaokoSmith]

Added just because I'm a (former) scientist who is keen on paleontology: the closest thing we have today to the dinosaurs would be the birds, not other reptiles.

I read recently that scientists at the Natural History Museum, the Royal Ontario Museum in Canada and Uppsala University in Sweden had gone back to scales and reptilian features for dinosaurs?

(Article entitled Scales tip against feathers and starting off 'fur continues to fly'.)

Do you mean to tell me that One Million Years BC was pure fantasy and cave women like Raquel Welch were not wandering around with boobs like that ... I mean dinosaurs ... to play with?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/8/89/One_Million_Years_BC.jpg/220px-One_Million_Years_BC.jpg

 

[TxRad]

I read recently that scientists at the Natural History Museum, the Royal Ontario Museum in Canada and Uppsala University in Sweden had gone back to scales and reptilian features for dinosaurs?

(Article entitled Scales tip against feathers and starting off 'fur continues to fly'.)

Do you mean to tell me that One Million Years BC was pure fantasy and cave women like Raquel Welch were not wandering around with boobs like that ... I mean dinosaurs ... to play with?

I like this one better:

 

[NaokoSmith]

I like this one better:

OMG! Did she have sex with the volcano?!!! Well, I guess that sure must have been ... hot.

 

[TxRad]

OMG! Did she have sex with the volcano?!!! Well, I guess that sure must have been ... hot.

Volcano sex!

Damn, some women do think big and then there are a few....

"We don't need no dinky Dinos."