alexander tzara
"Release The Bats!"
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2000
- Posts
- 1,111
I have a smutty site called trigg-er EROTic. All of my visitors over the past year have come to me via Literotica. I know this 'cause my site isn't on any search engines and the only links to it are from here.
So, anyway - this means that someone from Lit has contacted my Service Provider to complain about the fact that this image was on the warning page (the page that tells you that you have to be over 18 to enter the site):
http://vzone.virgin.net/dumbsulk.trigger/*smallbottom.GIF
No big deal, really. They just asked me to remove the image. I personally thought the pic was more artistic and classically erotic (like the Venus Di Milo) than offensive or pornographic.
(Of course, the suspicious part of me wondered if the complaint was from somebody up to mischief - maybe whoever keeps 1-ing my stories.)
What do you think? Is the image liable to corrupt minors and delicate sorts, or is it only offensive because of its association with an erotic site? Do you think I should have been allowed to keep it on my warning page, or do you think minors should be protected from images of ANY kind of nudity, even if it isn't overtly sexual?
So, anyway - this means that someone from Lit has contacted my Service Provider to complain about the fact that this image was on the warning page (the page that tells you that you have to be over 18 to enter the site):
http://vzone.virgin.net/dumbsulk.trigger/*smallbottom.GIF
No big deal, really. They just asked me to remove the image. I personally thought the pic was more artistic and classically erotic (like the Venus Di Milo) than offensive or pornographic.
(Of course, the suspicious part of me wondered if the complaint was from somebody up to mischief - maybe whoever keeps 1-ing my stories.)
What do you think? Is the image liable to corrupt minors and delicate sorts, or is it only offensive because of its association with an erotic site? Do you think I should have been allowed to keep it on my warning page, or do you think minors should be protected from images of ANY kind of nudity, even if it isn't overtly sexual?