Is this against the rules?

[live4thebj]

I have this idea based on a real life person. She is dropped dead gorgeous and is on several social media platforms. Never naked but you can see her in her bra with those giant tits.


The thing is I don’t think the story could work well unless you know what she actually looks like. Not a fan of the whole measurement thing. So I am asking if in the story I supply a link so you can get a visual is that against the rules?

 

[TarnishedPenny]

More or less, yes. And making it clearly a real person is another red flag.

This is the challenge facing writers, of course, how to describe somebody well enough in words that the reader forms the right picture in their mind.

 

[crookedletter]

The thing is I don’t think the story could work well unless you know what she actually looks like. Not a fan of the whole measurement thing.

The good news is there are many ways to describe a person and their... assets... without resorting to measurements. I'd suggest some artfully applied adjectives.

 

[live4thebj]

What if I give her name and tell the readers to Google her first before reading? For all we know it is her alias. And she is literally everywhere.

 

[BeechLeaf]

Or you could just have a character who wasn't her, but mention early on that several people had thought she was strikingly similar to Marilyn Monroe / Sylvester Stallone / whoever. Result: if your reader hadn't heard of this person, they will get the idea to image-search for her, without you having to belabour the point by telling them to.

 

[crookedletter]

What if I give her name and tell the readers to Google her first before reading? For all we know it is her alias. And she is literally everywhere.

It probably depends on her level of fame. There is a Celebrities and Fan Fiction category, where as I understand it people write about real people. Not a category I've spent any time perusing.

If your subject qualifies as a celebrity then technically it seems that's allowed. I'm not sure where that line is drawn.

My advice would be to create your own character inspired by this person. That ensures avoiding any thorniness in terms of both site guidelines and ethical concerns.

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

Never naked

That could lead to consent issues in an explicit story.

 

[Andreas_Kreuz]

You can go to an AI image site and have it generate an image that is like her, but is not her.
Like this?

 

[Rob_Royale]

I have this idea based on a real life person. She is dropped dead gorgeous and is on several social media platforms. Never naked but you can see her in her bra with those giant tits.
The thing is I don’t think the story could work well unless you know what she actually looks like. Not a fan of the whole measurement thing. So I am asking if in the story I supply a link so you can get a visual is that against the rules?

Honestly, as a fan of big tits and a writer that features them in every darn story, the word massive gets me there. When that word is used I see Olyria Roy and her incredible rack in my mind, and I get it. No need to be much more descriptive.

 

[RoyalAuthor]

To me, the job of a writer is to convey an image into the reader's mind. I'm sure there are plenty of ways you could describe this person that would get the point you're making across - if the goal is to illustrate her exceptional beauty, another character describing her in detail while fawning over her would allow for multiple paragraphs with descriptions of every aspect of her appearance.

As writers, it's our job to paint the picture with our words.

 

[BobbyBrandt]

First of all, basing a fictional story on a real person is more than fine. There is an entire category with that as one of its core topics (Fan Fiction/Celebrities)

The link you mentioned won't work, but give readers some credit for being able to do a simple search on the Internet if they are interested is seeing what she looks like. I currently have seven stories in a series about famous women. While most know who they are, not every reader in the world is going to recognize all of them by name.

Even my latest episode, inspired by one of the most popular actresses in America over the past two decades and an Academy Award nominee wasn't known by all the readers. That doesn't mean that they didn't enjoy the story and provide positive feedback.

 

[SimonDoom]

The thing is I don’t think the story could work well unless you know what she actually looks like. Not a fan of the whole measurement thing. So I am asking if in the story I supply a link so you can get a visual is that against the rules?

Why do you think this? Think about that carefully.

This site has a category for celebrities and fanfiction. So if she is a celebrity, you can write a story about her. But I don't recommend a link to her. The link itself probably would be against the rules.

I can't see a situation where a link would be necessary to make a story enjoyable and successful.

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

In fact, there are a number of celebrities that people rave over that I find completely unappealing.

I always used just a basic description ... tall, lean, thick flowing hair ... and let the reader fill in from there.


I once made refence to Joan Severance, but I'm not sure anybody caught it, either in favor or against.

 

[SimonDoom]

In fact, there are a number of celebrities that people rave over that I find completely unappealing.

I always used just a basic description ... tall, lean, thick flowing hair ... and let the reader fill in from there.


I once made refence to Joan Severance, but I'm not sure anybody caught it, either in favor or against.

Joan Severance. I remember her.

I agree with your approach. I have written story characters with celebrities or specific women in mind, but have never felt the need to refer to the celebrity specifically. The story works without that. The key is to be able to communicate what you find hot and sexy about that woman to the reader. Names and pictures don't matter.

 

[ElectricBlue]

What if I give her name and tell the readers to Google her first before reading? For all we know it is her alias. And she is literally everywhere.

I suspect there would be many people who don't have a clue who she is, so neither the name nor a photo is going to help much.

 

[EmilyMiller]

The thing is I don’t think the story could work well unless you know what she actually looks like.

Then describe her. It’s lazy not to. But it doesn’t need to be eight paragraphs of excruciating detail.

 

[Britva415]

if the goal is to illustrate her exceptional beauty, another character describing her in detail while fawning over her would allow for multiple paragraphs with descriptions of every aspect of her appearance.

As writers, it's our job to paint the picture with our words.

Photo-accuracy isn't called for, necessary, or even desirable in a story. And attempting it is doomed to fail.

We writers don't have to describe every aspect of her appearance. What we have to do is convey the parts which are important to the story. The difference between conveying and describing can be many, many, many unnecessary words. And most of the specific, detailed aspects of physical appearance are not necessary to the plot.

So, I think a better way to write about appearance is:
What is it about her appearance that's critical to making the events of the plot work? The answer to a question like that is almost certainly not "what does it look like," unless it's some kind of a mystery and the plot hinges upon recognition. The answer to a question like that is far more likely to be along the lines of how people react, how they feel about her appearance, and, a writer's word budget is much more effectively spent on describing that. I mean, not that Literotica is imposing a word budget, but, readers will.

If things doen't happen as the result of all those descriptions, then it isn't a story, it's an impressionist piece. I noped out of a story yesterday because not a goddamn thing happened on the entire first page. A protagonist looking in the mirror and describing every inch of what she sees is not plot.

That isn't what happened in the story I'm referring to, and it isn't true that literally nothing happened on page one, but the title and description and tags set certain expectations for what the story was about, and nothing related to what the story was about happened in the first 3700 words (one whole Lit page). The plot didn't advance one speck, despite several characters having a lot of what I'm sure the author thought was witty banter intended to create sympathetic characterization.

I can't be sympathetic if I don't know what the stakes are, so, if description isn't tied to something happening, isn't conveying the stakes, isn't creating plot impetus, then Chekhov cries.

 

[live4thebj]

Then describe her. It’s lazy not to. But it doesn’t need to be eight paragraphs of excruciating detail.

I find descriptions annoying in stories most of the time. She’s 32C blonde hair blue eyes 16 inch waist and so on.

 

[live4thebj]

I suspect there would be many people who don't have a clue who she is, so neither the name nor a photo is going to help much.

Yeah she isn’t Sydney Sweeney famous but IMHO way hotter.

 

[EmilyMiller]

I find descriptions annoying in stories most of the time. She’s 32C blonde hair blue eyes 16 inch waist and so on.

You are conflating description and measurements.

 

[live4thebj]

You can go to an AI image site and have it generate an image that is like her, but is not her.
Like this?
View attachment 2594711

I have to say AI porn lately has been hotter.

 

[FrancesScott]

I find descriptions annoying in stories most of the time. She’s 32C blonde hair blue eyes 16 inch waist and so on.

If I may build on what @EmilyMiller says, this is a description, one of my own:

She wore glasses that seemed forever to be slipping down her long, thin nose. Just now she pushed them back into place. Her hair was dark and wavy, without forming actual curls, and she habitually blew locks of it out of her face, which was slightly tanned. I recalled that she had once mentioned that her mother was originally from Syria.

As to whether she was pretty or not, I didn't feel qualified to opine. She was certainly prettier than me, but that wasn't saying much. And her expression was highly animated, providing not so subtle clues as to her inner thoughts, accentuated by her thick and mobile eyebrows.

 

[EmilyMiller]

If I may build on what @EmilyMiller says, then is a description, one of my own:

She wore glasses that seemed forever to be slipping down her long, thin nose. Just now she pushed them back into place. Her hair was dark and wavy, without forming actual curls, and she habitually blew locks of it out of her face, which was slightly tanned. I recalled that she had once mentioned that her mother was originally from Syria.

As to whether she was pretty or not, I didn't feel qualified to opine. She was certainly prettier than me, but that wasn't saying much. And her expression was highly animated, providing not so subtle clues as to her inner thoughts, accentuated by her thick and mobile eyebrows.

But how big are her breasts ?

 

[live4thebj]

If I may build on what @EmilyMiller says, then is a description, one of my own:

She wore glasses that seemed forever to be slipping down her long, thin nose. Just now she pushed them back into place. Her hair was dark and wavy, without forming actual curls, and she habitually blew locks of it out of her face, which was slightly tanned. I recalled that she had once mentioned that her mother was originally from Syria.

As to whether she was pretty or not, I didn't feel qualified to opine. She was certainly prettier than me, but that wasn't saying much. And her expression was highly animated, providing not so subtle clues as to her inner thoughts, accentuated by her thick and mobile eyebrows.

Well I just started writing it so I will go back about the descriptions.

 

[live4thebj]

But how big are her breasts ?

Since you asked.

https://www.instagram.com/theangiegriffin?igsh=MW1lZjRhZWJ1b2FkMg==