Is stolen nomination worth an investigation?

[OldJourno]

While liberals are in a frenzy about a sometimes fellow traveler and his imaginary links to Russia, isn't there a real crime to look into involving Bernie Sanders and his bid to win the Democratic nomination?
My own first thought on it was, basically, fuck it, it's a Democrat party issue and that's where it should remain.
And it was pretty hilarious watching Scott Pelley (is that his name?) telling his fellow colleagues at CBS how stunned Hillary was when she found out. All of these "journalists" were also stunned, and that was basically the end of the coverage. I could probably come up with a few follow-up questions for the parties involved, but that apparently never crossed their minds.
I watch a little bit of Fox News, and those folks didn't pursue the story either.
But if there's any truth to this conspiracy (and with Hillary involved, you know there is), millions of Democrats were disenfranchised in the primaries.
Isn't that something the FBI should look into?

 

[Rightguide]

Yes, we need a special prosecutor, a grand jury, and a hanging mob standing by.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Sanders has no interest, so it won't happen.

 

[OldJourno]

Sanders has no interest, so it won't happen.

Sort of like the beaten spouse, with eyes blackened and ribs cracked, who doesn't want to press charges, eh?
But is this about Sanders or is it about disenfranchised Democrat voters?
Aside from what Sanders may want (besides a free new house), what do you think, KO?

 

[KingOrfeo]

Sort of like the beaten spouse, with eyes blackened and ribs cracked, who doesn't want to press charges, eh?
But is this about Sanders or is it about disenfranchised Democrat voters?
Aside from what Sanders may want (besides a free new house), what do you think, KO?

Sanders endorsed Clinton unreservedly and, when asked the evening (or so) after the election about all the people saying he could've beaten Trump, smiled and spread his hands and said, "What good does that do now?!" I think most of his followers will feel the same way -- we wuz robbed, but let it go, now the focus is on 2018. At least, that's how they're acting:

Justice Democrats

Our Revolution

Brand New Congress

Indivisible

And many more.

Revisiting the 2016 Dem primary campaign is not on the agenda of any of these, so far as I can tell.

 

[Disgustipated]

Your side needs to come up with that health care thingy before you worry about Bernie and some dumbass witch-hunt.

 

[OldJourno]

Sanders endorsed Clinton unreservedly and, when asked the evening (or so) after the election about all the people saying he could've beaten Trump, smiled and spread his hands and said, "What good does that do now?!" I think most of his followers will feel the same way -- we wuz robbed, but let it go, now the focus is on 2018. At least, that's how they're acting:

Justice Democrats

Our Revolution

Brand New Congress

Indivisible

And many more.

Revisiting the 2016 Dem primary campaign is not on the agenda of any of these, so far as I can tell.

All well and good, KO, but what is your opinion?

 

[OldJourno]

Your side needs to come up with that health care thingy before you worry about Bernie and some dumbass witch-hunt.

I'm not familiar with how many investigators are at the disposal of Director Comey at the FBI, but if there are enough for the Russia/Trump witch-hunt, surely there should be one or two agents left over to look into the disenfranchisement of millions of Democrat voters.
Don't you think that is important?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

While liberals are in a frenzy about a sometimes fellow traveler and his imaginary links to Russia, isn't there a real crime to look into involving Bernie Sanders and his bid to win the Democratic nomination?
My own first thought on it was, basically, fuck it, it's a Democrat party issue and that's where it should remain.
And it was pretty hilarious watching Scott Pelley (is that his name?) telling his fellow colleagues at CBS how stunned Hillary was when she found out. All of these "journalists" were also stunned, and that was basically the end of the coverage. I could probably come up with a few follow-up questions for the parties involved, but that apparently never crossed their minds.
I watch a little bit of Fox News, and those folks didn't pursue the story either.
But if there's any truth to this conspiracy (and with Hillary involved, you know there is), millions of Democrats were disenfranchised in the primaries.
Isn't that something the FBI should look into?

No.
..

 

[OldJourno]

No.
..

Care to articulate why possibly disenfranchising millions of Democrat voters isn't worth an investigation?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Care to articulate why possibly disenfranchising millions of Democrat voters isn't worth an investigation?

That was party politics. Dirty but hardball. Don't like it? Don't be a Democrat or be a Democrat and get into the party hierarchy and have a say. But at the end of the day it is their party.

 

[BotanyBoy]

My own first thought on it was, basically, fuck it, it's a Democrat party issue and that's where it should remain.

I support this.

They did it, everyone saw it and (D)'s were all totally ok with it because Clinton is Dear Leader.

Let the (D)'s cannibalize themselves, it's almost as entertaining as watching (R)'s do the same thing.

 

[OldJourno]

That was party politics. Dirty but hardball. Don't like it? Don't be a Democrat or be a Democrat and get into the party hierarchy and have a say. But at the end of the day it is their party.

Like I said, that was my initial reaction. If Clinton won the nomination from the results of a bunch of caucuses, with the final outcome determined in the fabled smoke-filled room, that's fine.
But real people voted in these primaries that were not paid for by the party but by taxpayers of the various states.
Shouldn't that count for something.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Shouldn't that count for something.

No.

It's their vote, if they want to blow it on a corrupt organization, then fuck em'....they deserve what they get.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Old news! Quit diverting! Try keep up with the times. Democrats lost in case you missed the memo.

 

[KingOrfeo]

All well and good, KO, but what is your opinion?

What, about this?

But is this about Sanders or is it about disenfranchised Democrat voters?

It is about neither; it is about your sorry sort flailing desperately for a distraction from the failing toxic dumpster fire that is the Trump Admin/Pub Congress. Both Sanders and the Dem voters are looking to the future now. The whole matter remains moot unless and until a similar progressive-v.-establishment lineup emerges in the 2020 primaries.

 

[OldJourno]

What, about this?



It is about neither; it is about your sorry sort flailing desperately for a distraction from the failing toxic dumpster fire that is the Trump Admin/Pub Congress. Both Sanders and the Dem voters are looking to the future now. The whole matter remains moot unless and until a similar progressive-v.-establishment lineup emerges in the 2020 primaries.

A distraction to whom? Is the mainstream media taking its cues from threads I post here? FFS, that has to be about the stupi ... OK, I'll calm down.
You chose to reply to this thread, which I know proved to be a huge distraction from the daily onslaught of C&P threads you start. I am merely asking if you think no action was appropriate when it appears, in fact seems apparent, that millions of Democrat voters were disenfranchised in the primary season.
It's evident you don't want to answer, that you will let a bunch of links serve as your answer, and that you can't really even think beyond your talking points.
But, if it's not too much of a distraction, do you think the possible disenfranchisement of millions of Bernie Sanders supporters is worth an investigation?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Like I said, that was my initial reaction. If Clinton won the nomination from the results of a bunch of caucuses, with the final outcome determined in the fabled smoke-filled room, that's fine.
But real people voted in these primaries that were not paid for by the party but by taxpayers of the various states.
Shouldn't that count for something.

It does among Xemocrats.

 

[KingOrfeo]

It does among Xemocrats.

Kneel before Xemos! Xemos for Supreme God Emperor in 2016!

 

[KingOrfeo]

A distraction to whom? Is the mainstream media taking its cues from threads I post here? FFS, that has to be about the stupi ... OK, I'll calm down.

It might not be much of a distraction, but you certainly had no other reason to start the thread. This concern-trolling of Dems is just one more instance of Liticon dishonesty.

 

[sr71plt]

The OP might rank as the Trump dupe/dopes' weakest attempt at deflection of the day.

 

[Hard_Rom]

What about Wayne Tracker?
http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/polit...mails/ar-BByWzaU?li=AAggNb9&OCID=ansmsnnews11

 

[KingOrfeo]

What about Wayne Tracker?
http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/polit...mails/ar-BByWzaU?li=AAggNb9&OCID=ansmsnnews11

[reads story] My Og, that's not even really a porn name! [reads closer] Jesus, "Bob," and Allah, maybe it is after all!

 

[OldJourno]

Has anyone noticed that none of the liberals who responded managed to answer the question?
Rather than weigh in on whether there should be an investigation of the disenfranchisement of millions of Democrat voters, they deflected by accusing me of deflection.
It's a yes or no situation, and none of them can, so far, muster the balls to answer it.

 

[Hard_Rom]

The Democrats marginalized a lefty fringe candidate and the Republicans aggrandized a righty fringe candidate.