Is Peter Pan underage?

NemoAlia

Voracious
Joined
Jul 31, 2001
Posts
1,434
I recently submitted a story called "The Pan" to the humor category here at lit. It wasn't accepted. It's not too short, everything is spelled correctly, I followed the submission guidelines, etc. The only reason I can think of for its rejection is the fact that Peter Pan is one of the main characters, and that might qualify as child pornography. However, I think I disagree.

If considered literally, according to the original story, Peter is decades and decades older than many grown-ups. If, however, his emotional or sexual maturity is in question, those of us who read the original book know that his arrival at the Darling household is not due to his eagerness to associate with the family's children, Wendy, Michael, and Peter. Instead, he is fascinated by Mrs. Darling, and the elusive kiss that he saw always in the corner of her mouth.

In my story, told from Peter's point of view, I describe his fascination with the same kiss, which has now taken up residence on a young woman's belly, near her navel. The female character, Margaret, is clearly "of age," since she has pubic hair, etc. Moreover, she is herself a mother, with a little baby in the crib near her bed. The baby is not involved in any of the story except the exposition, which only mentions her as part of the scenery.

Should I leave out the baby? Should I be more specific about Margaret's age? Or should I give up entirely since the fictional Peter Pan is, despite his current hundred years of age, too young for sex?
 
Oh yeah, and if you follow Peter Pan's story all the way to the present day in the movie "Hook," he has grown up. He's an adult, of comparable age to Robin Williams. He returns to Neverland, that's true, but he's still a grown-up, capable of a crush on Tinkerbell. So, if he returns to the real world for a little nookie, he's perfectly allowed.
 
Aren't we all a bit Panish inside?

Send a mail or a post for Laurel and she might reconsider the story for you.

If Peter Pan could be considered under age then how the hell did Ray Dario's Alice in Wonderland stories get on? Also there's a story out there Tittled Hariot Hotter now thats suspect if you like;)
 
This age thing with Literary characters created in a different age, when morality was different, would appear to always have the potential to cause preblems by offending modern morality or pc thinking.

I mean even that tale of Hansel and Gretel offends modern norms in its sexist and agist attitudes towards persons of the female gender who choose to dwell alone in a rural location.

On a serious note, it would appear that any exploration of Romeo and Juliet using the original stage directions potentially could come into conflict with some of the child protection legislation, as both were only thirteen years old.

I do not know the solution - I only see the problems which hastily drawn-up legislation creates.

jon

Bye the way congratulations on your 100 postings HitchHiker now you have to get an AV:devil:
 
You will get an email that will tell you why it was rejected. From previous communications with others who've had this problem, this email seems to take about three days from time of rejection to time you get it.

Dunno why, Laurel says she sends it right away.
 
did anybody mention

Noddy?
:devil:


CONGRATS HITCHHIKER! wow, that sneaked up on me! rofl
i'm with jon - sort your AV out dear! can hardly wait to see what you choose ;)
 
OH YES!!!!!!

Wildsweetone is this a tease about your next story. -

Noddy and his friend Big Ears - there's a story for the "Gay Male" category!
 
jon.hayworth said:
This age thing with Literary characters created in a different age, when morality was different, would appear to always have the potential to cause preblems by offending modern morality or pc thinking.

I mean even that tale of Hansel and Gretel offends modern norms in its sexist and agist attitudes towards persons of the female gender who choose to dwell alone in a rural location.

On a serious note, it would appear that any exploration of Romeo and Juliet using the original stage directions potentially could come into conflict with some of the child protection legislation, as both were only thirteen years old.

I do not know the solution - I only see the problems which hastily drawn-up legislation creates.

jon

Bye the way congratulations on your 100 postings HitchHiker now you have to get an AV:devil:
:
Errrr... No.
Juliet was underage, although older than 13. (16, IIRC)
Romeo was an adult. Juliet wasn't even his first love.
:
Early modern ideas thought that women should be married
before their eighteenth birthdays.
(The original poster should get a letter saying WHY the story was rejected.)
 
Sorry, but Juliet was 13 in the original play. The text says "A fortnight and odd days...shall she be fourteen."

Pretentious? Moi?

The Earl
 
In fact, yes! Turns out Peter Pan is not underage... my story is just too short.

Of course that begs the question, "What does length have to do with eroticism?" <wink> I mean, I hear it's not size that matters, it's what you do with it. Some of Anais Nin's best work is short, yes?

It's hard to write a longer story in first person, future tense.
 
He's so infantile it's a wonder that he ever made it w/ Wendy. But I suppose saving lives does have its' rewards.
 
Hah to few words that sort of kicked this debate into the gutter.
How can you write story in so few words.

Mine just gets bigger and bigger the more I play with them.

Peterpan and Wendy flying now theres a thought better than a 747 loo at 39000 feet:p
 
Hitchhiker -- I know how it feels always to watch your writing get longer and longer. That's usually my problem too. However, this isn't the standard narrative form, so it doesn't quite conform to my standard practices of writing. I'll PM you with the story if you want to read it; I'd be happy for your comments!
 
Too Short?

Thought a short, short story was a short-short.

At least under 1000 words, usually closer to 500; some as brief as 100. I know because I have written a few.

But never in erotica. Too many tabs and screws! Too many tongues in grooves!


Quasi
 
Back
Top