LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Is it wrong to look for a sugar daddy?

No... not inherently wrong. However, it might turn into a sticky situation (so to speak).

What would you want? Simply a place to live and an allowance?
 
jeremyjeeves said:
No... not inherently wrong. However, it might turn into a sticky situation (so to speak).

What would you want? Simply a place to live and an allowance?
Click to expand...

Eh no. I don't think I could live with the person.
 
Then... you just want an allowance and patron for your studies?

What's in it for "him"?
 
It's not wrong.

Just makes you look totally unambitious, mindless and a bit of a deadbeat.
 
Not wrong at all. You may find one here... There are enough of us married guys with means.
 
It isn't wrong, but here will be the rules:

When out in public, or at any place I desire, you will act like you are expected to act, and dress as I expect you to dress. Sex when I want it, it is not up for discussion, you will not have a say to how, where or when. If I want head, you drop and give me head, swallow it like a goid girl, and all will be good. If I want your ass, no questions, just grin and bear it.

Also bring a pretty friend, her services will be expected as well.

Any questions?
 
See, I am the complete opposite. I may be broke, but I don't want the assistance of a man or anyone else for that matter. I'm saving up for college, can't afford it yet. I hate going on dates because of the whole who pays thing. The guy always assumes it's his job, but I would be more comfortable paying my share. I know it's a gentleman thing, but eh. It's like holding open doors. Sometimes I like to be the one holding the door open.
 
angelicecstasy said:
See, I am the complete opposite. I may be broke, but I don't want the assistance of a man or anyone else for that matter. I'm saving up for college, can't afford it yet. I hate going on dates because of the whole who pays thing. The guy always assumes it's his job, but I would be more comfortable paying my share. I know it's a gentleman thing, but eh. It's like holding open doors. Sometimes I like to be the one holding the door open.
Click to expand...

I prefer your style.
 
angelicecstasy said:
See, I am the complete opposite. I may be broke, but I don't want the assistance of a man or anyone else for that matter. I'm saving up for college, can't afford it yet. I hate going on dates because of the whole who pays thing. The guy always assumes it's his job, but I would be more comfortable paying my share. I know it's a gentleman thing, but eh. It's like holding open doors. Sometimes I like to be the one holding the door open.
Click to expand...

That is very refreshing!
 
angelicecstasy said:
See, I am the complete opposite. I may be broke, but I don't want the assistance of a man or anyone else for that matter. I'm saving up for college, can't afford it yet. I hate going on dates because of the whole who pays thing. The guy always assumes it's his job, but I would be more comfortable paying my share. I know it's a gentleman thing, but eh. It's like holding open doors. Sometimes I like to be the one holding the door open.
Click to expand...

Not that I wouldn't let you pay sometimes or open the door sometimes, but chivalry does exist in some of us and it'd be my first inclination to get the door for you pretty much every time.
 
You need to check legality of asking on this site. Could get them in big trouble.
 
Alternative

Maybe an alternative would be an older man who buys you nice things and takes you to nice places. However, you could afford to do those things on your own but you want someone else to do them sometimes.

Alternatively, maybe an older man that helps you when you are financially in trouble but you generally take care of yourself. However, if you had this type of arrangement, it would be better if you didn't only spend time with him when you needed money.

However, none of these scenarios are probably what you would refer to as a sugar daddy.

I'm just proposing looking for more than money from the relationship. Although, some people may find that idea ridiculous but it is just a thought.
 
Eh, I'd try to be independent rather than find a sugar daddy. If you're only into him for his money, he'll probably only be into you for your looks, and once those fade, he will trade you in for a newer model and then you'll be old, ugly and broke.
 
There was a study years ago that looked at what attracted women to men and vise versa. The number one thing men wanted was a woman who was attractive, and -- of course -- what the men considered attractive was dependent upon which culture from which the individual men came.

The number one thing women wanted was a man who could support them and, in the long run, their offspring. It's genetic, not just for humans but for all animals (for whom the male of the species remain after birth to aid with rearing or protecting the young).

So, to answer your question in one word, No. It's not wrong to look for a sugar daddy. Women (in general) are wired to look for a man (or at least a mate) who will support them. It's in your DNA. Just like it's in my DNA to look for a female who gets me hot enough to want to breed and, thus, produce those offspring.
 
Is it wrong to buy broke college girls gifts in exchange for virtual companionship?
 
It's not wrong to want a sugar daddy. I think it is wrong not to try another path first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Wheres daddy?
Replies
10
Views
1K
wintergrain
W
D
Denver Trans Man Looking for Daddy
Replies
4
Views
359
Down_in_Denver
D
F
Daddy, Tell me what to do
Replies
6
Views
661
MaturemanAJ
MaturemanAJ
S
Girl Looking for Daddy
Replies
8
Views
1K
supermac9
S
kyen
Virgin son looking for mom but not a sugar mom.
Replies
3
Views
594
Zippy100
Z
Back
Top