Is it worse to try and fail or not try and not fail?

it is not comforting to know

that yoda

was the phlosopher paramount

for a generation of nerds
 
Does that apply to rock climbing?
Don't climb free and expect to survive intact. Double-check your climbing aids.

Different activities can have different classes of outcomes. We (hopefully) don't approach life-and-health-threatening situations as casually as we do writing pr0n. If it can kill you, better do it right every time, eh? Check your chocks.

Meanwhile, trying does not guarantee success. NOT trying guarantees failure.

Then there's the Silicon Valley rubric: If you haven't failed, you haven't learned. Each failure teaches you something. Mr Edison learned of thousands of materials that don't make good incandescent lamp filaments before he found a material that DID work. Every failure teaches you what path not to follow again.
 
If you're career path is robbing banks, it might be best to never try.
If you wanna peek in Cindy Sanderson's window, I say get a ladder and go for it.
 
'Try. Fail. Try again. Fail better.'

'If at first you don't succeed, try, try, and try again. Then give up. No point being a damn' fool about it.'

I've always been wary of this. Nobody gets a cookie from banging their head against the wall over and over.

Try. Fail. Learn your limits. Adjust your approach or move on.
 
If you don't get up to bat, you can't even strike out.
So I drink beer in the bleachers.
The total asshole golfer Gary Player once said, "only your wife and dog will remember if you finish second, and that's only if you have a good wife and dog"
So he cheated like a mutherfukker every chance he could.
I find that inspirational.
 
It is always better to try and fail than to live the rest of your life wondering "what if".
 
Depends on who and where you are. Basically the bigger your safety net the better it is to try and fail rather than not try. Don't have a massive safety net, better to go for the slow and steady victory.
 
Back
Top